General S-REITs Discussion Thread

limster

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2000
Messages
13,106
Reaction score
4,077
I myself have not bought yet because i am overwhelmed with a plethora of information and have difficulty digesting.
beware of paralysis by analysis. market will carry on without you if you cannot decide whether to buy or not.

Like I said, thanks for letting me know about this ETF. I looked at it and found it interesting but have some reservations so I have decided this is not for me. But it may well be suitable for you.

I keep my portfolio simple and believe that markets generally go up. thats why I am not so desperate to pay fees to a product that has "downside" production.

If I want some market crash protection, I can simply channel more of my cash flow into good quality fixed income.

finally I note that the Daymax ETFs are actively managed and were launched in 2025. I would be comfortable with a least a 5 year track record before I start investing. Even if the 'idea' or 'strategy' is good (and with less than 1 year track record, it remains to be seen), the fund managers may not be.
 

elvintay07

Suspended
Joined
Jan 4, 2022
Messages
12,367
Reaction score
4,441
The mid term election in US will give us some chance to add at reasonable valuation. Keep about $100k bullets to fire and later will be shiok shiok
 

sky1978

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
745
Reaction score
457
Thanks for the caution. Give me some time to check on the warnings that you provided. Based on my understanding, the distributions are not from the capital because if this is true, the NAV will suffer, but the NAV does not seem to drop. And also if this is true, the youtubers will be complaining. But this ETF is one of the group of ETFs being highlighted for no NAV erosion.

The EFTs were launched about half a year ago, right? From Aug to now, the TSX index has already moved from 27k to 34k; even if distributions were paid out of capital, there won't be NAV erosion, assuming most of those dividend-paying stocks are also index components and have enjoyed similar price appreciation. If you are going to gauge performance, you should compare the total return to the appropriate index.

I would be more interested to know the actual income from writing those options vs what those YouTubers are saying or thinking. Ultimately, investors are buying into a ETFs using covered calls to enhance its return, so it is important to know the returns delivered by this enhancement strategy. Can writing options daily and utilising 25% leverage provide the additional 10%++ absolute return?
 

Nipponho

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2011
Messages
647
Reaction score
10
The EFTs were launched about half a year ago, right? From Aug to now, the TSX index has already moved from 27k to 34k; even if distributions were paid out of capital, there won't be NAV erosion, assuming most of those dividend-paying stocks are also index components and have enjoyed similar price appreciation. If you are going to gauge performance, you should compare the total return to the appropriate index.

I would be more interested to know the actual income from writing those options vs what those YouTubers are saying or thinking. Ultimately, investors are buying into a ETFs using covered calls to enhance its return, so it is important to know the returns delivered by this enhancement strategy. Can writing options daily and utilising 25% leverage provide the additional 10%++ absolute return?
If you only compare NAVs alone, these covered calls ETF will always under-perform the index because when prices goes up, some of the options become exercised and the underlying stock is being taken away, so they have to rinse and repeat. Some NAVs even went into red. But what about the monthly or weekly distributions? These can be DRIPPED or re-invested in some other things to diversify. Total Distributions + NAV gain/loss = Total Returns. Based on my observation, the total returns didn't lose to index gains. And then what about the compounding of reinvestment?

The options earnings is usually 4-5%. But 10% is possible. Can or cannot is dependent on the skill of the manager to spot the opportunities. Check out Rex NVDA. Its options earnings alone is more than 30%.

Your skepticism and misconceptions were exactly same as what I had at beginning. I am in the process of sorting out which are the good manager and funds and which are lousy ones. Anyway this is singapore REITS thread, not CC ETF thread, and I am not earning commission from promoting it. I just highlight this one for somebody to help him/her diversify away from S&P. I am just trying to squeeze out more. If you are uncomfortable, you can stick reits, 5% should be achievable safely as long as not kena rights issue.
 

Shion

Senior Mentor
Joined
Oct 24, 2008
Messages
376,179
Reaction score
122,367

Singapore-listed data centre REITs post revenue growth, positive sector outlook for 2026​


https://www.straitstimes.com/busine...ctor-outlook-for-2026?ref=singapore-companies

SINGAPORE – Singapore’s data centre real estate investment trusts (REITs) delivered robust revenue growth in 2025 on the back of AI-driven demand, putting the sector on solid footing for 2026.

But despite the revenue growth, market performance has lagged, with all three pure-play data centre REITs – Keppel DC REIT, Digital Core REIT and NTT DC REIT – largely trading flat.

Analysts expect the sector to remain a growth anchor in digital infrastructure. Many are positive about the future of data centres, with the acceleration of agentic AI expected to increase demand for more sophisticated infrastructure.

A shift from artificial intelligence training to inferencing – where AI models can produce predictions or conclusions – would lead to a growth in edge or near-edge data centres, said Mr Xavier Lee, senior equity analyst at Morningstar. These data centres are located closer to end users or devices, reducing data transit time and latency.

Some governments are also becoming more supportive of AI development.

In Singapore, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong on Feb 12 unveiled in his record $154.7 billion Budget for 2026 a nationwide AI push that would, among other aims, anchor Singapore as a regional AI hub.

This would create a new engine of growth and strengthen the economy’s ability to compete globally while sustaining profitability, long-term expansion and high living standards.

Despite its land constraints, the Republic still sees data centres as a key part of its digital transformation strategy.

But the sector faces numerous headwinds, most notably power constraints which could affect the development of larger data centres designed for heavier workloads.

Rising build costs and macro-financing conditions could also temper short-term sector pricing despite the industry’s strong fundamentals, said Mr Darren Chan, research manager at Phillip Securities Research, while government support and restrictions on data centre development could influence market demand and operators’ cost structures.

Whatever the case, analysts agree that the REITs’ share performance will hinge on distribution per unit (DPU) growth and whether interest rates fall further.

Maybank equity analyst Krishna Guha said the largely flat performance of the three data centre REITs is broadly in line with, or slightly ahead of, the wider Singapore REITs sector, which is down about 2 per cent year to date.

Interest rates are no longer falling as steeply as before, which could be another contributing factor for the REITs’ market performance, he noted.

“DPU growth is mixed and yield spreads are also tight for names like Keppel DC REIT. A combination of higher DPU growth and lower interest rates can be the drivers of better performance.”

Mr Chan said: “REITs remain primarily a yield-focused instrument, and until interest rates decline further, a sharp re-rating is unlikely. Their valuations are largely influenced by the yield spread relative to bonds and other fixed-income assets.”

Keppel DC REIT still undervalued​

Mr Lee of Morningstar is positive on Keppel DC REIT, the first data centre REIT to be listed on the Singapore Exchange (SGX) in 2014.

The REIT posted $230.1 million in revenue for the second half of the financial year ended Dec 31, 2025, up 50.3 per cent from a year ago.

DPU for the second half of 2025, which rose 7.1 per cent to 5.2 cents, will be paid out on March 19, the REIT’s manager said on Jan 30.

Its net property income (NPI) for the second half of 2025 grew 57 per cent to $200.4 million, with the full year amounting to $383.3 million.

Total revenue for the full fiscal year was up 42.2 per cent at $441.4 million, while its DPU rose 9.8 per cent year on year to 10.4 cents.

Keppel DC REIT attributed its growth to the acquisition of four data centres in Singapore and Japan amounting to $1.1 billion, as well as higher contributions from contract renewals and rising rental rates.

This was partially offset by the divestments of Intellicentre Campus in Australia and Kelsterbach Data Centre in Germany, as well as the absence of a one-off dispute settlement sum received in 2024.

With the completed acquisitions, Keppel DC REIT now has 25 data centres across 10 countries in its portfolio. It said it is on track to divest its Malaysia data centre as well as complete the proposed sale of M1-issued NetCo bonds and preference shares in 2026 following the parent company’s sale of the telecommunications business to rival Simba. This would unlock around $163.4 million, which would be redeployed into higher-yielding investments.

Yet, Keppel DC REIT’s unit price has been relatively range-bound despite its revenue growth, with units of the REIT closing the week 0.9 per cent higher at $2.27 on Feb 20.

Mr Lee said the REIT’s muted performance may stem from valuations already capturing the growth outlook. It is trading at around 1.3 times price-to-book, indicating that near-term earnings accretion has largely been priced in.

“Investors may also be cautious over potential equity fund-raising, given the REIT’s acquisition-driven strategy. Expectations of future capital needs may weigh on sentiment despite improving fundamentals.”

In his view, though, Keppel DC REIT units are still undervalued, “supported by an attractive yield distribution forecast of 4.9 per cent in 2026”.

Softer performance for Digital Core REIT, NTT DC REIT​

The other data centre REIT that has grown its portfolio through acquisitions is Digital Core REIT.

The manager of Digital Core REIT declared on Feb 4 a DPU of 1.8 US cents (2.28 Singapore cents) for the second half of the 2025 financial year ended Dec 31, unchanged from the year-ago period.

Total DPU for the full fiscal year was also unchanged from the previous year at 3.6 US cents.

This was despite revenue for the second half of 2025 increasing 61.6 per cent to US$87.3 million, while total revenue for the fiscal year grew 72.2 per cent to US$176.2 million.

While its property expenses for the fiscal year doubled to US$87.4 million, NPI still grew 43.5 per cent to US$88.7 million.

Digital Core REIT, which listed on SGX in 2021, has 11 data centres across the United States, Canada, Germany and Japan. Its manager said its portfolio occupancy remained unchanged at 97 per cent in 2025.

In March 2025, it acquired a 20 per cent stake in a second fully fitted freehold data centre in Osaka from Mitsubishi Corp for 13 billion yen (S$106.2 million), which is expected to be 1.8 per cent accretive to its DPU.

On Jan 5, it announced it had reached a 10-year agreement with an investment-grade global cloud service provider to occupy the entire Linton Hall facility in Virginia. As at Dec 31, 2025, its occupancy had grown from 81 per cent to 98 per cent.

The agreement will start on Dec 1 and is expected to generate around US$14.8 million in NPI annually.

Units of Digital Core REIT closed the week flat at 52.5 US cents on Feb 20.

NTT DC REIT, which listed in Singapore in July 2025, performed less strongly.

It recorded US$106 million in revenue – 1.7 per cent higher than its initial public offering forecast – in its nine-month business update for the year ended Dec 31, 2025.

Its NPI fell short of its forecast by 0.6 per cent at US$47.1 million, while its portfolio occupancy also dropped from 95.1 per cent in the third quarter of 2025 to 94.6 per cent, though its manager said its committed occupancy since the third quarter stands at 97.3 per cent. Rental reversion increased 9.2 per cent.

Units of NTT DC REIT closed the week flat at 99.5 US cents on Feb 20.

Data centres have become prized assets in the REITs market in recent years, as managers seek higher-yielding properties to grow their portfolios while maintaining asset-light structures.

Beyond pure-play data centre REITs such as Keppel DC REIT, Digital Core REIT and NTT DC REIT, several mainboard-listed REITs also hold data centre assets as part of diversified real estate portfolios.

These include Mapletree Industrial Trust, which has 59 data centres mostly in the US, and CapitaLand Ascendas REIT, which acquired a data centre in Tai Seng in 2025 for $275.5 million and announced in February its plans to redevelop its data centre in Tampines.

Investors may also get exposure to data centres through blue-chip stocks like Singtel and ST Engineering.
 

elvintay07

Suspended
Joined
Jan 4, 2022
Messages
12,367
Reaction score
4,441
Actually 1 major killer is the rights issue or private placement. At times may sink deeper into the shithole if not careful.

Best is to be cautious and also look at China/ hk dividend paying etf
 

Nipponho

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2011
Messages
647
Reaction score
10
I keep my portfolio simple and believe that markets generally go up. thats why I am not so desperate to pay fees to a product that has "downside" production.
Were you the one who said you want to outperform s&p? I just came across one being mentioned by finfluenzer. Ticker is CGDV. Outperform by quite a lot. This one is not blindly replicate s&p. It is actively managed to select only powderful counters. CGDV = capital group dividend value, but the distribution is neglibile, only 1%. Looks more like a growth portfolio than dividends. This one no complicated options, don't worry, it is simple portfolio. Good luck. If i come across others later, i let you know.
 

limster

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2000
Messages
13,106
Reaction score
4,077
Were you the one who said you want to outperform s&p? I just came across one being mentioned by finfluenzer. Ticker is CGDV. Outperform by quite a lot. This one is not blindly replicate s&p. It is actively managed to select only powderful counters. CGDV = capital group dividend value, but the distribution is neglibile, only 1%. Looks more like a growth portfolio than dividends. This one no complicated options, don't worry, it is simple portfolio. Good luck. If i come across others later, i let you know.
Thanks. Its actively managed, launched in 2022, so far nudging ahead of S&P500. However, for SG investor paying 30% WHT tax on a dividend ETF (and being subject to estate duty), might end up underperforming S&P500.

- to avoid complaints - can you post in the US stock thread in future? since this is S-reit thread.
 
Last edited:

limster

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2000
Messages
13,106
Reaction score
4,077
SREITs really getting hammered today. Higher inflation due to oil prices=no rate cut, and travel being curtailed?

Setting some TP. FLCT, under $0.90, I will buy to average down.
 

DevilPlate

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2020
Messages
12,236
Reaction score
5,155
SREITs really getting hammered today. Higher inflation due to oil prices=no rate cut, and travel being curtailed?

Setting some TP. FLCT, under $0.90, I will buy to average down.
Ascott looks yummy but me still wait and see
 

Nipponho

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2011
Messages
647
Reaction score
10
how about due diligence first whether FLCT and ascott has any possibility of acquiring new assets? because if they made known any intentions, maybe we should wait a while. Dilution is very harmful. You see keepel, it was 1.03 before announcement just a few months ago, now is 93, two years worth of past dividends being wiped out . Recently weeks it is lend lease. These 2 are opportunities but it is not safe to hold long term because if they issue non-renounceable rights, that means they do not place unit holders interest as first priority. This kind of non-renounceable is very unfair to existing holders. Lend Lease i think last year also one round like this, I saw on blogs people complaining.
 

limster

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2000
Messages
13,106
Reaction score
4,077
how about due diligence first whether FLCT and ascott has any possibility of acquiring new assets? because if they made known any intentions, maybe we should wait a while. Dilution is very harmful. You see keepel, it was 1.03 before announcement just a few months ago, now is 93, two years worth of past dividends being wiped out . Recently weeks it is lend lease. These 2 are opportunities but it is not safe to hold long term because if they issue non-renounceable rights, that means they do not place unit holders interest as first priority. This kind of non-renounceable is very unfair to existing holders. Lend Lease i think last year also one round like this, I saw on blogs people complaining.
I don't own Keppel, I don't own Lend Lease. LL I won't touch with a 10 foot pole. Ascott's acquisitions have been pretty good. FLCT not bad, and definitely better than LL.

Roughly 10% down from last week's closing price will be a good entry point for me to buy more FLCT and Ascott.

Hospitality REITs like Ascott definitely got risk. But middle East war will probably mean that Asians travel more regionally rather than flying to Europe/USA. Middle East cancel F1 races will mean that F1 races elsewhere may become more 'important'.
 

d5dude

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Messages
14,307
Reaction score
5,672
This sub-sector is horrendous, did not participate in the massive STI rally from liberation day but it always makes sure to go down big time when the index corrects.
 

DriftKing

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2005
Messages
2,470
Reaction score
438
This sub-sector is horrendous, did not participate in the massive STI rally from liberation day but it always makes sure to go down big time when the index corrects.
Bought right before war, now almost down 10%...
 

lunafan

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
397
Reaction score
25
This sub-sector is horrendous, did not participate in the massive STI rally from liberation day but it always makes sure to go down big time when the index corrects.
How can that be? I’m almost up 20-30% for most counters before last week. Even right now, still up quite a bit. Waiting for more juicy prices to arrive then start to buy some more
 

Nipponho

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2011
Messages
647
Reaction score
10
I don't own Keppel, I don't own Lend Lease. LL I won't touch with a 10 foot pole. Ascott's acquisitions have been pretty good. FLCT not bad, and definitely better than LL.

Roughly 10% down from last week's closing price will be a good entry point for me to buy more FLCT and Ascott.

Hospitality REITs like Ascott definitely got risk. But middle East war will probably mean that Asians travel more regionally rather than flying to Europe/USA. Middle East cancel F1 races will mean that F1 races elsewhere may become more 'important'.
ascott has been diluted recently? ok i go and research on this. A few weeks ago i was looking at ascott, but a finfluenzer pointed out a better value : Far East. Better valuation and gearing, dividends about same, but of course don't have capitaland backing.
 

limster

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2000
Messages
13,106
Reaction score
4,077
ascott has been diluted recently? ok i go and research on this. A few weeks ago i was looking at ascott, but a finfluenzer pointed out a better value : Far East. Better valuation and gearing, dividends about same, but of course don't have capitaland backing.
Far East vs Ascott, as long as you buy at the correct price, you will be ok.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top