[GPU Review] Sapphire AMD r9 Fury X on the rise!

[royfrosty]

Ok its slightly more difficult to cross ref alllll the benchmarks. Some turn on this some turn on that, some tested ultra some tested high. Gosh.

So narrowed down for Tomb Raider. For my results, i set the same settings and rerun 3 times to take the closes scores.

It seems like Hardware Canucks have some uber Fury X lol





Oops its 87.6* for my fury X on 2nd chart ***

 

[Jian19]

maybe thats why their whine so jia lat

 

[royfrosty]

maybe thats why their whine so jia lat

Hahahaha. Nice theory.

 

[idjekyll]

silicon lottery at work?

 

[Mikiberry]

Ok its slightly more difficult to cross ref alllll the benchmarks. Some turn on this some turn on that, some tested ultra some tested high. Gosh.

So narrowed down for Tomb Raider. For my results, i set the same settings and rerun 3 times to take the closes scores.

It seems like Hardware Canucks have some uber Fury X lol





Oops its 87.6* for my fury X on 2nd chart ***

Is their cpu base similar?

 

[Maximus_XXVIII]

Your card also good, maybe the CPU on Hardwarecanuck's test bench helped bump up a few FPS.

Edit: Their test bench is using Intel i7 4930K @ 4.7GHz

 

[monikernemo]

Alot of discrepancy leh...

Sent from microwave oven using GAGT

 

[monikernemo]

How bout running benches a few more times then take the average to reduce chances of statistical error?

Sent from microwave oven using GAGT

 

[avsquare]

I noticed that quite a handful of reviewer's test bench (even HWZ's) are using the X platform. Say testing on X99 vs Z97 got so much difference meh?

 

[Mikiberry]

How bout running benches a few more times then take the average to reduce chances of statistical error?

Sent from microwave oven using GAGT

Different Rams different cpu different config. -+ 5-7 fps max. It's around there.
Not controlled testing u run x number of times still pointless imho.

 

[royfrosty]

How bout running benches a few more times then take the average to reduce chances of statistical error?

Sent from microwave oven using GAGT

Yeap all the frames you see is average frames.

For mine i run 3 times. All quite close by the decimal.

And im running a stock 4770k.

 

[Jian19]

reviewers all x79/99 with 16-32gb ram leh....

so few fps diff is possible de

 

[Maximus_XXVIII]

Yeap all the frames you see is average frames.

For mine i run 3 times. All quite close by the decimal.

And im running a stock 4770k.

You got a golden chip. haha

 

[royfrosty]

I noticed that quite a handful of reviewer's test bench (even HWZ's) are using the X platform. Say testing on X99 vs Z97 got so much difference meh?

There is. The rams and also the cpu.

The rams for ddr4 minimum already 2400mhz. Some of them use faster rams. Also factoring in their cpu clocked speed.

They can pull slightly higher results. Not much but some even pull 9 frames more. Which can also lead to inaccurate frames recorded and fans will go crazy that it performs extremely well if the 980ti hits 9fps more. Lol

I think the best is still to have the reults at 1-2% gap differences.

 

[monikernemo]

Different Rams different cpu different config. -+ 5-7 fps max. It's around there.
Not controlled testing u run x number of times still pointless imho.

I mean at least for people who have the hardware then again, quite troublesome and pointless as you pointed out because cannot cross compare with others who run different hardware..

Also noted the different drivers implemented

But 5-7 is quite a significant margin of error hmm though not a significant bump in experience haha. Weird right.

Or is it a specific system/CPU trend that would benefit a particular gpu I.e. (just drawing examples) more cores beneficial with fury? Quad core benefits nvidia? High/low clock speed for ram/CPU benefits red/green etc?

Sent from microwave oven using GAGT

 

[monikernemo]

Yeap all the frames you see is average frames.

For mine i run 3 times. All quite close by the decimal.

And im running a stock 4770k.

Ahh okay I see

Sent from microwave oven using GAGT

 

[wideCDMA]

So now simlim still no stock for Fury ?

 

[Maximus_XXVIII]

So now simlim still no stock for Fury ?

No more because Kingtiger hoot them all. LOL

 

[wideCDMA]

No more because Kingtiger hoot them all. LOL

haiz wasted..... tot of going down to get....

 

[monikernemo]

No more because Kingtiger hoot them all. LOL

He say only hahhah

Spoiler

Plot twist: Bemylove is actually kingtiger2014

Sent from microwave oven using GAGT