I am amazed by this point of view, but of course you are entitled to it. but let me get this right, you are basically saying
1. bigger screen needs faster processor and
2. we should not compare Desire with Legend because they have different processor speed right?
my point is that
1. bigger screen may or may not need faster processor. different processor for the same os is just to cater to different needs/demands of different people.
2. even though Desire and Legend have different processor speeds, perceptibly there is not much difference to an ordinary consumer like me.
3. i agree we should not compare oranges to apples but in this case the two phones are similar enough to be compared. in fact, it is thru doing comparisons implicitly or explicitly that consumers decide which features cater to their unique individual needs. In this case it is not just the processor that appeals; maybe it is the unibody? maybe it is the handier size? maybe it is the material?
anyway, i won't be responding to this particular discussion between us already because it is obviously an impasse. Besides the arguments smacks of tautology.
Its obviously a fact that because they have bigger screen, they require faster processor. if not, why they don't put 1 ghz processor into legend? you can't deny the fact that bigger screen requires more processor power. And now you are comparing processor speed, lol, if you just compare them like that of coz 1ghz is faster than 600mhz, unless you failed your maths. But in this case because of size difference, its unfair to compare, unless both are of the same size.
You are like comparing a laptop/notebook with a netbook.
