watzup_ken
High Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2003
- Messages
- 25,672
- Reaction score
- 2,123
Nvidia mindset is very strong is one factor. If Intel had launched these cards with glowing reviews (ideal scenario), then I think they will also become quite popular. But we all know that did not happen, and as you can tell people still having the mindset that Intel ARC owners are still beta testers. The initial impression is usually what sets the stage. Not to mention that it took Intel about a year to resolve the teething issues.the boss there mentioned that no matter how low they set the price, still very hard to move stock. i guess nvidia mindshare very strong here in sg.
i heard that the software reported power consumption is usually quite inaccurate. even the lowest bin a580 easily pulls 200w+ in actual measurements despite reporting 150-160w.
![]()
Unfortunately, I don't have a device that tells me the exact power draw of the GPU. I am just comparing the power draw of the cards that I used to have from Nvidia and AMD, with this Intel ARC. So if it is a software inaccuracy, I assume it will apply to AMD and Nvidia cards as well. So still a fair comparison in my opinion and I think the idle power draw is too high @ 40+W. I believe this is due to the fact that the memory don't get downclocked much when the GPU is at idle. Other tell tale sign where I think the power draw is ok is the GPU temps @ around 60+ degrees C. I am using the Sparkle ROC, so it is not using some fancy cooler.
I don't know when this A580 was tested in Techpowerup, but it may be fixed through the driver refinement. It is similar to when AMD first introduced the RX 7900 series where the idle and frame rate capped power draw was very high. Seems like the driver is making the GPU work very hard regardless of load. I think AMD resolved when I was testing out a RX 7800 XT. In any case, the power consumption is less of an issue to me because truth to be told, I rarely use my main computer nowadays.
Last edited:


will post more pics in hoot club later.

