Koenig168
Arch-Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2007
- Messages
- 10,046
- Reaction score
- 1,750

There is something wrong with his testing. Out of the box default the board will set to PL2 max. I suspect he has unlocked 'Extreme Power Mode' which allows PL3 to be enabled which hit 350W which he has hit 353W. There is no way in hell any AIO is gonna cool 353W with that mode. That mode should only be used on a full proper custom loop. On a normal custom loop with PL2, the max temps are only 80 degrees for a stock 13900k running Cinebench R23.tl;dr The i9-13900K is an amazingly fast CPU. From zero to thermal throttling in 17 seconds (that's with a 360 AIO).
View attachment 36168
thats not wrong, thats how intel has been benched by most reviewers since mce was a thing in 8th gen. if anything, it just means that 13900k is impractical for 99% of conventional diy builders, and most should look to the 13700k and below.There is something wrong with his testing. Out of the box default the board will set to PL2 max. I suspect he has unlocked 'Extreme Power Mode' which allows PL3 to be enabled which hit 350W which he has hit 353W. There is no way in hell any AIO is gonna cool 353W with that mode. That mode should only be used on a full proper custom loop. On a normal custom loop with PL2, the max temps are only 80 degrees for a stock 13900k running Cinebench R23.
thats not wrong, thats how intel has been benched by most reviewers since mce was a thing. if anything, it just means that 13900k is impractical for conventional diy builders.
There is something wrong with his testing. Out of the box default the board will set to PL2 max. I suspect he has unlocked 'Extreme Power Mode' which allows PL3 to be enabled which hit 350W which he has hit 353W. There is no way in hell any AIO is gonna cool 353W with that mode. That mode should only be used on a full proper custom loop. On a normal custom loop with PL2, the max temps are only 80 degrees for a stock 13900k running Cinebench R23.
He was talking about just over 300W, roughly in line with what Tech Jesus got. (I skimmed both videos so maybe I missed something. So please feel free to correct me.)
interesting, seems like intel has followed nvidia and offered optional extreme power consumption. hwu does out of the box testing though, so other than setting xmp and rebar they dont tweak other settings, so this might be the default setting for that motherboard he used.I doubt PL3 is the actual mode that is meant to be tested. They merely made PL1=PL2 which means max is 255W not 350W at PL3.
https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/i...extreme-performance-mode-at-350-watt-tdp.html
Find it weird it sets to PL3 as those who have been testing even with latest bios prior to launch all is set to PL1=PL2 by default. PL3 has to be manually unlocked.interesting, seems like intel has followed nvidia and offered optional extreme power consumption. hwu does test out of the box testing though, so other than setting xmp they dont tweak other settings, so this might be the default setting for that motherboard he used.
tech jesus says they tested it on a z690 (not z790) under "intel default guidance" and still did 300w @ 4:05:Find it weird it sets to PL3 as those who have been testing even with latest bios prior to launch all is set to PL1=PL2 by default. PL3 has to be manually unlocked.
tech jesus says they tested it on a z690 (not z790) under "intel default guidance" and still did 300w @ 4:10:
perhaps last minute change to default bios settings?
interesting, seems like intel has followed nvidia and offered optional extreme power consumption. hwu does out of the box testing though, so other than setting xmp and rebar they dont tweak other settings, so this might be the default setting for that motherboard he used.

.......
Anyway, easy skip for both.
saw those popular reviewers review 13900 currently, any trusted reviews on 13700 and 13600? how does it compare to amd in terms of gaming?