You can tune the chip to run at extreme clock speed but the side effect is the exponentially increasing power requirement. It is not sustainable when it gets increasingly more difficult to shrink these transistors and with competition so intense. I feel most CPUs or SOCs are clocked right out of the gate, as high as possible with may be another 5 to 10% overclock possible. And these marginal improvement in clockspeed is not going to make any meaningful improvement in performance in most cases.Yep Intel foundry is bestest. Wasted they lost their way and allow TSMC to steal the business. The old batch of Intel engineers must be chopped! Pat must save the day!
TSMC chips are boring, squeeze until no headroom. Good enough to lelong to third parties. They ownself hang up and keep increasing prices now! Pat must save the day!
My first Intel OC, i was blown away, from 3ghz turbo to 4ghz sustained, just punch in bios. This after i changed from Amd P2X4 940, which struggled to get from 3ghz to 3.2ghz
Intel OC headroom still can see up to 13900K but the power sucking was at its limit.
Optimistic maybe but the demand outlook for intel's core ultra-based AI PCs remains strong
and I believe the company can navigate near-term wafer-level supply constraints and improve
its revenue growth throughout 2025.
Intel stock is 37% below its 10-year average, indicating an attractive buying opportunity but that's just me
Was just being hopeful with the interconnect thing alas it being the bane of going chiplets.
Yep just for bbfa fun, now under tsmc, do some optimisation oc can get 10% more ish improvement with small power bump.
last time Intel was king, can get 30% ish under same pattern
Pat must lead us back to glory!
See this drama
https://www.trendforce.com/news/202...ble-ai-chip-violation-involving-huaweis-910b/
Following the investigation launched by the U.S. Commerce Department on whether TSMC has manufactured smartphone or AI chips for Huawei, the foundry giant seems to have identified the underlying issue. According to a report by Reuters, TSMC announced on Tuesday that it has notified Washington about a possible effort by Huawei to bypass U.S. export restrictions.
It is worth noting that TSMC had reportedly informed the U.S. Commerce Department after receiving an order for a chip similar to Huawei’s Ascend 910B, a processor designed for training large language models, Financial Times reveals. How the chip ended up in Huawei’s possession remains unclear.
ARL
In my opinion, I wonder what can the US do if they indeed find TSMC dealing with Huawei? They said they may sanction TSMC, but this will be at a severe expense of US chip manufacturer and to the benefit of China.See this drama
https://www.trendforce.com/news/202...ble-ai-chip-violation-involving-huaweis-910b/
Following the investigation launched by the U.S. Commerce Department on whether TSMC has manufactured smartphone or AI chips for Huawei, the foundry giant seems to have identified the underlying issue. According to a report by Reuters, TSMC announced on Tuesday that it has notified Washington about a possible effort by Huawei to bypass U.S. export restrictions.
It is worth noting that TSMC had reportedly informed the U.S. Commerce Department after receiving an order for a chip similar to Huawei’s Ascend 910B, a processor designed for training large language models, Financial Times reveals. How the chip ended up in Huawei’s possession remains unclear.
.
They using DUV to produce these chips, yield is lower thus more costly, the profit margin isn't great. Nah, you can even question if they making any profits or surviving through government grants. Well, it doesn't matter to us consumers as long it is cheaper and better, or can affect other things to be cheaper and better. Hahahahah.
