JH Audio Appreciation Thread

stvc11

Member
Joined
May 13, 2005
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
The 1st set is flawed set, mis match color left and right shell. The carbon fibre case had lot of hole on it. There is parting between faceplate and shell. Jerry himself not happy with the quality so he make me another pair.
 

stvc11

Member
Joined
May 13, 2005
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
did the op use a fake pic too?

heres pics of my tips.

jkkaXLQ.jpg


iQAO3rx.jpg


it's the slim versino of this P-Series - Comply with the top cut off. you only put on a little bit, not all the way, and then push everything deep into your ear.

sounds night and day better than my other tips. really amazing how much better it sounds this way.

looking at pic i just noticed that my ear canal seems to have bent the tip a little to better align. interesting. i think this might sound good because it provides very deep isolation without using a lot of foam. i dont know just guessing.

Hmm.. If you say the improvement are more on the bass, the bass is good to me, punchy and comparable to LCD-X / XC. Better than LCD-2 for my impression. But it's too bassy for me, after changed the cable ok now I like the bass and sound stage also wider. Rox is still superb if listen to rock but What I'm looking for is the high which a little dark for me especially for vocal. All the above is IMO, my ear is not trained.
 
Last edited:

roxanneuniversal

Junior Member
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Hmm.. If you say the improvement are more on the bass, the bass is good to me, punchy and comparable to LCD-X / XC. Better than LCD-2 for my impression. But it's too bassy for me, after changed the cable ok now I like the bass and sound stage also wider. Rox is still superb if listen to rock but What I'm looking for is the high which a little dark for me especially for vocal. All the above is IMO, my ear is not trained.

i'm not sure you'll ever get that level of high with roxanne. i think it has enough treble but it's definitely not ever bright. i would say it's warm to maybe barely "neutral."

link to some songs with highs that you like
 

roxanneuniversal

Junior Member
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Hmm.. If you say the improvement are more on the bass, the bass is good to me, punchy and comparable to LCD-X / XC. Better than LCD-2 for my impression. But it's too bassy for me, after changed the cable ok now I like the bass and sound stage also wider. Rox is still superb if listen to rock but What I'm looking for is the high which a little dark for me especially for vocal. All the above is IMO, my ear is not trained.

With this setup the bass becomes so tight and controlled that it seems like less bass, but it's more satisfying bass.
 

Legend2127

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2007
Messages
2,006
Reaction score
13
Maybe u guys can try Lear custom silicone ear tips.... Should give you the next closest custom experience...
 

roxanneuniversal

Junior Member
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
link?

i'll try them but i don't predict they'll sound better than the one i crafted (pic earlier) after trying like a dozen tips. it sounds amazing. maybe better than custom i dont know i dont own custom mode.
 

Legend2127

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2007
Messages
2,006
Reaction score
13
link?

i'll try them but i don't predict they'll sound better than the one i crafted (pic earlier) after trying like a dozen tips. it sounds amazing. maybe better than custom i dont know i dont own custom mode.

Saw on TREOO under Lear custom tips....
 

kenz

Master Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2003
Messages
2,555
Reaction score
0
Clarity on Roxanne will take some time to shine through.
Adjusting the bass knobs all the way down, will help if it sounds "veiled".

From my still short time with her (been away for refit), the sound isn't exactly what I would call veiled, but more "full". that there is more air, content and sight warmth in the space and notes. There's really a lot going on in the presented sound by the Roxanne and very different from other flagship iems/customs.

We're so used to how a flagship iem sounds like they become a "reference" of sort, and I can understand this part seeing the debate on whether the Noble K10 or Roxanne is the better one on headfi.

The way I see it, the Noble K10 continues to push the path of the familiar, in what we know today as the "reference" iem/custom sound. While the Roxanne is a new iem/custom, forging a different path, to make the iem/custom more Headphone-like in sound. It's a new "preference" I would say. more so than which is better.
 

XcoldstarX

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2004
Messages
10,938
Reaction score
89
Clarity on Roxanne will take some time to shine through.
Adjusting the bass knobs all the way down, will help if it sounds "veiled".

From my still short time with her (been away for refit), the sound isn't exactly what I would call veiled, but more "full". that there is more air, content and sight warmth in the space and notes. There's really a lot going on in the presented sound by the Roxanne and very different from other flagship iems/customs.

We're so used to how a flagship iem sounds like they become a "reference" of sort, and I can understand this part seeing the debate on whether the Noble K10 or Roxanne is the better one on headfi.

The way I see it, the Noble K10 continues to push the path of the familiar, in what we know today as the "reference" iem/custom sound. While the Roxanne is a new iem/custom, forging a different path, to make the iem/custom more Headphone-like in sound. It's a new "preference" I would say. more so than which is better.

Is your impression of the K10 based on the demo unit?
 

kenz

Master Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2003
Messages
2,555
Reaction score
0
Is your impression of the K10 based on the demo unit?

Yup. Tried the demo at treoo.

While it was very good in many aspects, the bass presentation came across as slow, a little slight distortion. There's a dip in the lower region of the bass that took me off really. Other than that, the rest of the frequencies are decent, but doesn't really get me going.

However, personally, I'd still prefer my JH13 (non freqphase) over the K10.
Similar stand in my audition of the JH13FP.
And surprisingly, the UM Mentor gets my vote over K10 as well.

No fate with noble I guess.
 

XcoldstarX

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2004
Messages
10,938
Reaction score
89
Yup. Tried the demo at treoo.

While it was very good in many aspects, the bass presentation came across as slow, a little slight distortion. There's a dip in the lower region of the bass that took me off really. Other than that, the rest of the frequencies are decent, but doesn't really get me going.

However, personally, I'd still prefer my JH13 (non freqphase) over the K10.
Similar stand in my audition of the JH13FP.
And surprisingly, the UM Mentor gets my vote over K10 as well.

No fate with noble I guess.

Well, it's a demo unit, like how much difference the Roxanne Universal when used with tips that are not so optimised for use with it and a custom Roxanne, the custom unit and demo unit of Kaiser 10 sound very very different.

The JH13 is really good though.
 

kenz

Master Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2003
Messages
2,555
Reaction score
0
Well, it's a demo unit, like how much difference the Roxanne Universal when used with tips that are not so optimised for use with it and a custom Roxanne, the custom unit and demo unit of Kaiser 10 sound very very different.

The JH13 is really good though.

True. The Roxanne demo was less than ideal.
Though both gave me a sense of how their custom versions would carry through sonically.

Still, my preference tend towards the Mentor and JH13FP demos.

Will give the Kaiser 10 another go should i go for another custom.
Presently very pleased with my JH Roxanne. :D
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top