NintendoSwitch
Arch-Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2024
- Messages
- 13,950
- Reaction score
- 5,397
I tot already hv?MPs also need welfare? Next time they should form a party for rich people welfare in sg
I tot already hv?MPs also need welfare? Next time they should form a party for rich people welfare in sg
ya lor...point finger will surely tio pofma de.U mean Pogba till teh kor drop?
If they are sponsored by govt to run the place,why do they need to up rent by any percent? U mean current base tent no enough? As I said either base rent or profit share,to do both is just plain greedy. Plus if the stall Making losses will timbre share in the losses n collect less than base or no rent? Cannot be 有福同享,但有难不同当?Timbre doesn't need to support the discount for the app because hawkers knew when they bidded for stall and would have upped their prices accordingly.
It's exactly because they take 15% of stalls earnings, as opposed to making rent 15% higher as an example, that they have SKIN IN THE GAME and hence there's no need to quantity or qualify or have it in the contract how they are attracting footfall to the location because its IN THEIR INTEREST to do so.
Comprende?
If the hawker jialat, the operator also jialat, because they take a hit also. Better than if they have absolutely no stake and that's when they really will do nothing.Honestly, the Yishun Park Hawker Centre is really jialat. No crowds. The stall holders burning money.
who managed timbre ?
is any MP involved in the group?
Maybe it's time to relook at whether MPs and Politicians can be directly involved in any company dealing with govt. If it is almost all, then so be it. You want your profits, you dont join politics.
What is 'base rent'. How do you know 'base rent' wouldn't be 15% higher without the 15% profit sharing?If they are sponsored by govt to run the place,why do they need to up rent by any percent? U mean current base tent no enough? As I said either base rent or profit share,to do both is just plain greedy. Plus if the stall Making losses will timbre share in the losses n collect less than base or no rent? Cannot be 有福同享,但有难不同当?
how can do both?then the store huat u huat more.the store dont huat u still earn.no matter what u as operator will sure win only hawker risk losing everything.what social enterprise?bs enterprise more like it.What is 'base rent'. How do you know 'base rent' wouldn't be 15% higher without the 15% profit sharing?
You assume the two are stacked.
You still don't get it?why can's we have more NTUC Food Centres? And NEA operated food markets and food courts?
15% is ridiculous ...
I think such practice stems from all the malls too in sinkieland if not wrong ... landlords will take a certain percentage from the sales of successful businesses ... anyone can confirm if this were the common practice?
Can I give you an example or how profit sharing works in another scenario?how can do both?then the store huat u huat more.the store dont huat u still earn.no matter what u as operator will sure win only hawker risk losing everything.what social enterprise?bs enterprise more like it.
Should just get rid of all these greedy fat cats. Confiscate their ill-gotten gains and leave their reputation in pieces
15% is not ridiculous. U shld see some foodcourt where it is as high as 22-24%. Mind you, is 15% of REVENUE, not profit.
Do you know that some of the prime locations like Airport T3, esp the fishball noodles. The revenue can go as high as 6 figures and rental is super high.
So who pays who? NEA pays timbre to manage the hawker centre?If the hawker jialat, the operator also jialat, because they take a hit also. Better than if they have absolutely no stake and that's when they really will do nothing.