I ish not a jamus supporter and ish quite neutral in thish regard.
But i can see chiu are quite bitter and refuse to understand what jamus ish saying sho chiu can blind chuirself to the merits of his statements.
Whatever jamus said and what i said, anyone can take and go ask any student or professor of economics and they will verify the logic behind.
There may be other points not yet considered which may supercede and invalidate Jamus's suggestion for tax (e.g. if elasticities and incidences of tax are known and based on those Jamus's tax scheme ish found to be unworkable).
Thish ish huai if chiu listen to jamus's speech he ish actually not outright arguing for his tax. He ish only asking oyk if such a tax ish possible. And he mentioned mechanisms (e.g. the elasticities) to be considered to find out of thish tax ish possible.
But based on the limited points Jamus said so far, it all ish logical arguments. and i can see where he's coming from.
Indonesia will ask for a share since flights departing from Singapore uses more of their airspace than ours.
They are already complaining that we are controlling their airspace.