I cannot but disagree with your statement.
A company must grow but to grow and leave behind the very essence of which makes them uniquely different seems a misdirected strategy. I supported MR due to the great effort in community building.
The way I see it, MR has been over stretching their resources in order to maximize profitability. There is nothing wrong with that, though. However, certain standards, that were painstakingly achieved, have since been compromised. Its like taking 2 steps forward but one step backward.
By all means, support MR. Give credits where credit are due . But it's also important
to provide constructive criticism when needed. Both ways contribute to the growth of a company, not just blindly supporting