yihao93
Arch-Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2012
- Messages
- 19,009
- Reaction score
- 0
SINGAPORE - Singapore's economic growth cannot be achieved through manpower growth, but should be pursued based on productivity and innovation, Education Minister (Higher Education and Skills) Ong Ye Kung said on Tuesday (Jan 24) as he gave a preview of an upcoming governmental report about how the country's economy will enter its next phase.
Speaking at an international roundtable organised by the Singapore University of Technology and Design's Lee Kuan Yew Centre for Innovative Cities, Mr Ong said that Singapore's manpower growth was bound by its small size, challenging demographic trends as well as the need to preserve a sense of identity.
The report by the Committee on the Future Economy will thus focus on figuring out how Singapore can maximise the use of its limited resources.
"We are on an irreversible journey to pursue growth based on productivity and innovation," he said.
Mr Ong, who is also the Second Minister of Defence, said the report will go deeper into the "algorithms and mechanisms of (resource) allocation, achieving quantum leaps in optimisation".
"In other words, we are answering the question: how do we do more with less?" he said.
This can be done by anticipating areas of future growth, deepening the skills base of employees here, encouraging people and businesses to enter regional and global markets, and nurturing an enterprising spirit.
Mr Ong said that while the Government can foster an environment that facilitates enterprise, society needs to "play an even bigger role in the way it views failures, celebrates successes, and decides who it shall honour".
"Today, our culture is to honour scholars who have good academic grades, who can rise in organisations and bureaucracies," said Mr Ong.
"We need to put on the same pedestal the entrepreneurs, who have tried, who have failed, but have succeeded. We need to honour them."
http://www.straitstimes.com/singapo...ill-focus-on-doing-more-with-less-ong-ye-kung
sounds very similar to this
You know who answers the question: What is 2+2?
"I have to say a lot of people have been asking this question. No, really. A lot of people come up to me and they ask me. They say, "What's 2+2"? And I tell them look, we know what 2+2 is. We've had almost eight years of the worst kind of math you can imagine. Oh my god, I can't believe it. Addition and subtraction of the 1s the 2s and the 3s. Its terrible. Its just terrible. Look, if you want to know what 2+2 is, do you want to know what 2+2 is? I'll tell you.
First of all the number 2, by the way I love the number 2. It's probably my favorite number, no it is my favorite number. You know what, it's probably more like the number two but with a lot of zeros behind it. A lot. If I'm being honest, I mean, if I'm being honest. I like a lot of zeros. Except for Marco Rubio, now he's a zero that I don't like. Though, I probably shouldn't say that. He's a nice guy but he's like, "10101000101", on and on, like that. He's like a computer! You know what I mean? He's like a computer. I don't know. I mean, you know.
So, we have all these numbers and we can add them and subtract them and add them. TIMES them even. Did you know that? We can times them OR divide them, they don't tell you that, and I'll tell you, no one is better at the order of operations than me. You wouldn't believe it. That I can tell you. So, we're gonna be the best on 2+2, believe me. OK? Alright. Thank you."

