-> OFFICIAL SAMSUNG GALAXY S5 THREAD <-

gapboy

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2003
Messages
20,628
Reaction score
6,461
actually i don't mind no WOW factor. But putting a 2GB RAM and 2,800mAh battery is just not acceptable. I am not asking for a large 4000mAh battery, at least a 3,200 mAh battery and 3GB RAM. This is not asking for the sky in today's context.

Everyone wants something better than the old s4 can't agree with you more on s5 being stingy on the RAM and battery they put in.

Note3 i am still thinking is so much better than S5 in many ways guess i am keeping my note3 till something better comes mid-later this year. :s22:
 

Hakuteiken

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
202
Reaction score
16
It is also like the gold coloured iphone. Yes, there were phones with gold colour before it. However, now, after Apple, I see more and more gold coloured phone.
 

newouverture

Senior Member
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
1,445
Reaction score
0
I guess all our wives and gfs are happy with this S5 launch. At least they are sure we won't spend money in April.....

But coming June or July, different story liao...
 

Super

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
24,601
Reaction score
0
i like the fact that its IP67 and can still swap battery
Samsung said "Water and dust resistance" was one of the top 5 features customer wanted. I think that is total BS. We want a metal body. I am surprised that that did not make it to top 5. The Pokka dots back really CMI.
 

SEvsNK

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2004
Messages
22,594
Reaction score
514
Not arguing anything here, but just pointing out once again that if it's really the Snapdragon 805 processor in the phone, perhaps you might want to check your statement on "64bit cpu".


As for "why bother copying", this is one of those statements that sounds fun to throw out, but when you think about it, Samsung doesn't even make that processor, nor do they even have a choice. The company responsible for this isn't Apple either.

According to phone arena, the CPU is under the snapdragon 801 instead, just clocked at it's max speed as it was designed.
 

Akai Ryu

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Messages
22,313
Reaction score
253
The waterproof thingy.. Remind me of the rubberish Nokia phone last time..... Hahaha

Samsung said "Water and dust resistance" was one of the top 5 features customer wanted. I think that is total BS. We want a metal body. I am surprised that that did not make it to top 5. The Pokka dots back really CMI.

With this ip67 direction...Im just glad that I didnt invest in some tech of nano spraying devices to be waterproof...

As for aesthetics...specifically back cover....well it was the same complaint for note 3 when it first launched.... nothing a case cant solve? At the end of the day most will want some form of individuality.....then again its just a phone :s13:
 

Computeron

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
19,960
Reaction score
1,721
I guess all our wives and gfs are happy with this S5 launch. At least they are sure we won't spend money in April.....

But coming June or July, different story liao...

u pure somesong fan?
cuz u can buy Z2.

all hate the back plate, but u all forgotten it can replaceable with glass etc :s13::s13: just buy 3rd party backplate.

wat i really dislike is the tiny step above s4 only. we waited for so long, and yet somesong only gave us this tiny bit of improvement.
 

renfred89

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
17,512
Reaction score
19
actually i don't mind no WOW factor. But putting a 2GB RAM and 2,800mAh battery is just not acceptable. I am not asking for a large 4000mAh battery, at least a 3,200 mAh battery and 3GB RAM. This is not asking for the sky in today's context.

Its true that its disappointing as there isnt any obvious substantial differences between s4 and s5.

In the point of commercial view, one reason u could think of is that samsung wants a wider line drawn between galaxy note series and galaxy S series. If both get 3gb ram and 3200mah, the diff between these 2 series is only the S-pen.

To me, a better processor, fingerprint sensor and better camera aren't attractive to me. Thats why note 3 is still my best pal despite poorer specs comparing to s5 in consideration of above factors..
 

Computeron

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
19,960
Reaction score
1,721
0e9467358e894ac9a94ec3e536042cbb.jpg

5c8c5c252a594f5ca224d458efdfd3d3.jpg
 

RequiemDK

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2005
Messages
400
Reaction score
0
Its true that its disappointing as there isnt any obvious substantial differences between s4 and s5.

In the point of commercial view, one reason u could think of is that samsung wants a wider line drawn between galaxy note series and galaxy S series. If both get 3gb ram and 3200mah, the diff between these 2 series is only the S-pen.

To me, a better processor, fingerprint sensor and better camera aren't attractive to me. Thats why note 3 is still my best pal despite poorer specs comparing to s5 in consideration of above factors..

Exactly.

I think Samsung dug itself into a pit when they released all their Pro line tablets recently, and the Note 3 late last year. If the S5 is a real envelope pusher, it'd take the media focus out of those devices, and eclipse the Note 3, even though the Note 3 is designed to be a different kind of device.

Going by what happened to the Galaxy S4, it seems like Samsung's product launches no longer have any real meaning since they can and will update the product mid-way throughout its life cycle, e.g. the S4 LTE-A version with the SD 800 processor, then the S4 LTE-A with the Note 3-style back. Ultimately, Samsung holds itself hostage to its rigid product launch schedule, but Qualcomm controls the technological revolution behind non-iPhone phones. I wouldn't be surprised if Samsung updates the S5 in June when the Snapdragon 805 is released. It could also be a way to win back some trust in the Exynos brand since their Exynos 5 processors were lacklustre compared to the Snapdragon 800, provided the Exynos 6 powering the octa-core version S5 actually finally has things like LTE radio and QuickCharge and other goodies. In theory, the Exynos 5 could have been more powerful and yet power efficient than the Snapdragon 800, but it was really quite far from being so.

All I know is, expect a more powerful variant of the S5 later on. It also seems like Samsung is expecting the public to take the Note series as its flagship instead of the Galaxy S series. At least the S4 was able to clearly outmatch the Note 2's specs. Now, there's very little reason for anyone to ditch a Note 3 for the S5, assuming they had no need of the S Pen. On a more subjective note, I think the Note 3's back looks a hell lot nicer than the S5's. Seriously......
 
Last edited:

kelvinti

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2009
Messages
23,276
Reaction score
2,438
no...home button on a watch..no!
I think Gear fit is much nicer. But it won't be samsung if it doesn't cost S$500.

Did you mean "No" as in Not worth it or "No home button", so not worth it!!!!???:s11::s8:

Gear Fit is nicer in HD color but it doesn't looks like a watch. I still prefer square square watch! :s22:
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top