- Joined
- Sep 16, 2018
- Messages
- 35,806
- Reaction score
- 12,041
Using OOkla SpeedTest CLI to compare wireless latency.
Acer Windows 11 laptop with Inte AX201 WiFi 6 adapter. Close reange test, signal strength is good at around -40dBm to -45dBm for all three routers. With three wireless broadcasters forming a triangle, there will be some interferences among them even though I try to spread out the channel used.
From the results, we can still see that in terms of upload latency, RT-AX86U is the best among the three and H3C NX30 Pro is the worst. Kind of expected as well since the price of RT-AX86U is still the highest whereas H3C NX30 Pro is a very low cost WiFi 6 router. And in terms of speed, all three are actually pretty much the same.
1) H3C NX30 Pro running MediaTek vendor driver, CH36, 80MHz channel bandwidth, no QoS/SQM measures, router mode (Double NAT).
加速状态
We can see upload latency is not that good.
2) ZTE BE7200 Pro+, CH149, 80MHz channel bandwidth, router mode (Double NAT)
3) Asus RT-AX86U, CH60, 80MHz channel bandwidth, router mode (no Double NAT)
4) H3C NX30 Pro with Open Source driver -- speed is a bit slower but latency is a bit better than vendor driver.
Acer Windows 11 laptop with Inte AX201 WiFi 6 adapter. Close reange test, signal strength is good at around -40dBm to -45dBm for all three routers. With three wireless broadcasters forming a triangle, there will be some interferences among them even though I try to spread out the channel used.
From the results, we can still see that in terms of upload latency, RT-AX86U is the best among the three and H3C NX30 Pro is the worst. Kind of expected as well since the price of RT-AX86U is still the highest whereas H3C NX30 Pro is a very low cost WiFi 6 router. And in terms of speed, all three are actually pretty much the same.
1) H3C NX30 Pro running MediaTek vendor driver, CH36, 80MHz channel bandwidth, no QoS/SQM measures, router mode (Double NAT).
加速状态
| 快速转发引擎 | MediaTek HNAT |
| 全锥形 NAT | Boardcom Fullcone |
| TCP 拥塞控制算法 | BBR |
Bash:
root@OpenWrt:~# uname -a
Linux OpenWrt 5.4.255 #0 SMP Thu Dec 14 17:24:08 2023 aarch64 GNU/Linux
root@OpenWrt:~# ubus call system board | grep 'model\|description'
"model": "H3C NX30PRO",
"description": "ImmortalWrt 21.02-SNAPSHOT r20458-417b4cba51"We can see upload latency is not that good.
Bash:
PS C:\work\speedtest\ookla-speedtest-1.2.0-win64> .\speedtest.exe -s 13623
Speedtest by Ookla
Server: Singtel - Singapore (id: 13623)
ISP: Singtel Fibre
Idle Latency: 4.54 ms (jitter: 0.25ms, low: 4.19ms, high: 4.73ms)
Download: 615.16 Mbps (data used: 1.0 GB)
9.38 ms (jitter: 10.14ms, low: 4.08ms, high: 131.58ms)
Upload: 298.00 Mbps (data used: 363.9 MB)
66.96 ms (jitter: 41.50ms, low: 3.94ms, high: 567.14ms)
Packet Loss: 0.0%
Result URL: https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/ca13613a-588a-4992-9872-6d6418cc21852) ZTE BE7200 Pro+, CH149, 80MHz channel bandwidth, router mode (Double NAT)
Bash:
PS C:\work\speedtest\ookla-speedtest-1.2.0-win64> .\speedtest.exe -s 13623
Speedtest by Ookla
Server: Singtel - Singapore (id: 13623)
ISP: Singtel Fibre
Idle Latency: 3.31 ms (jitter: 0.84ms, low: 3.22ms, high: 4.92ms)
Download: 630.57 Mbps (data used: 981.1 MB)
9.98 ms (jitter: 16.81ms, low: 4.22ms, high: 125.54ms)
Upload: 388.82 Mbps (data used: 694.4 MB)
48.35 ms (jitter: 17.87ms, low: 5.77ms, high: 167.79ms)
Packet Loss: 0.0%
Result URL: https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/84c771ce-3a5c-4150-87a5-5771fcede69e3) Asus RT-AX86U, CH60, 80MHz channel bandwidth, router mode (no Double NAT)
Bash:
PS C:\work\speedtest\ookla-speedtest-1.2.0-win64> .\speedtest.exe -s 13623
Speedtest by Ookla
Server: Singtel - Singapore (id: 13623)
ISP: Singtel Fibre
Idle Latency: 3.27 ms (jitter: 0.48ms, low: 2.76ms, high: 3.90ms)
Download: 611.67 Mbps (data used: 962.1 MB)
9.31 ms (jitter: 14.63ms, low: 3.12ms, high: 131.11ms)
Upload: 370.16 Mbps (data used: 670.9 MB)
28.90 ms (jitter: 14.02ms, low: 3.60ms, high: 239.34ms)
Packet Loss: 0.0%
Result URL: https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/ff75e180-bbd2-443c-85c8-031c20100d974) H3C NX30 Pro with Open Source driver -- speed is a bit slower but latency is a bit better than vendor driver.
Bash:
root@ImmortalWrt:~# uname -a
Linux ImmortalWrt 5.15.155 #0 SMP Fri May 3 14:16:03 2024 aarch64 GNU/Linux
root@ImmortalWrt:~# ubus call system board | grep 'model\|description'
"model": "H3C Magic NX30 Pro (NMBM layout)",
"description": "ImmortalWrt 23.05-SNAPSHOT r27694-e540dc745a"
PS C:\work\speedtest\ookla-speedtest-1.2.0-win64> .\speedtest.exe -s 13623
Speedtest by Ookla
Server: Singtel - Singapore (id: 13623)
ISP: Singtel Fibre
Idle Latency: 4.34 ms (jitter: 0.44ms, low: 3.70ms, high: 4.66ms)
Download: 531.01 Mbps (data used: 629.5 MB)
9.39 ms (jitter: 7.69ms, low: 4.03ms, high: 116.73ms)
Upload: 478.65 Mbps (data used: 791.9 MB)
37.11 ms (jitter: 26.70ms, low: 9.54ms, high: 489.05ms)
Packet Loss: 0.0%
Result URL: https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/d247ee1f-9f06-4ba0-a0aa-fe0342185e97
PS C:\work\speedtest\ookla-speedtest-1.2.0-win64> .\speedtest.exe -s 13623
Speedtest by Ookla
Server: Singtel - Singapore (id: 13623)
ISP: Singtel Fibre
Idle Latency: 4.37 ms (jitter: 0.41ms, low: 4.10ms, high: 4.83ms)
Download: 450.82 Mbps (data used: 655.6 MB)
10.15 ms (jitter: 13.69ms, low: 3.30ms, high: 71.26ms)
Upload: 439.26 Mbps (data used: 488.0 MB)
38.62 ms (jitter: 18.51ms, low: 7.51ms, high: 342.70ms)
Packet Loss: 0.0%
Result URL: https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/af297a1d-06e8-47be-a391-3119943e103c
Last edited:
