Plextor M5 Pro SSD

mistersatki_

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2011
Messages
18,429
Reaction score
1,099
bcos all the few ppl that recommend hardware build in hw clinic all prefer intel / crucial
bo lang like plextor

though its marvell controller
 

KalTorak

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2000
Messages
1,579
Reaction score
23
bcos all the few ppl that recommend hardware build in hw clinic all prefer intel / crucial
bo lang like plextor

though its marvell controller
True this..
Most of the hw recommendations are based on flavor-of-the-month parts.

I was one of those who were sucked into the Memoright FTM plus SSD hype last year.
That SSD was crap! (and even mis-leading product line).
Was all too happy to get rid of it.
 

t258jgn

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2008
Messages
45,268
Reaction score
740
Currently Plextor M5 Pro are the cheapest in SG with 5yrs walk-in warranty by Convergent Systems.
 

kakashi159

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
I have an existing hard drive with windows 7 installed. I am thinking of reformatting the drive and changing the OS to be installed in plextor Pro SSD and the old hard drive as a storage drive. How should I do that? I am a noob in these. Do i need to change any bios setting?
 

bibu00

Master Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2010
Messages
4,328
Reaction score
0
I bought a plextor m5 from fuwell and it keep crashing and crashing with windows 8. Tried on 3 different systems all same problem. 100% confirm is hard drive problem. Dont know if i got lemon set or its just not as reliable as i thought.
 

denilson

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Messages
623
Reaction score
4
I bought a plextor m5 from fuwell and it keep crashing and crashing with windows 8. Tried on 3 different systems all same problem. 100% confirm is hard drive problem. Dont know if i got lemon set or its just not as reliable as i thought.

Are you using it in a laptop?
 

szeli

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2003
Messages
21,459
Reaction score
3,154
e 5 yr warranty sounds good but does it have firmware flashing utilities for Mac/Linux?
 

midautumn

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
135
Reaction score
0
M5pro 256gb on laptop - 3Gb/s speeds only

Has anyone used this on their laptop before?

I ran AS SSD benchmarks and my score was 556 (around half of other scores posted online) and transfer speeds ~250mbs (half of plextor's advertised top speeds). Intel Rapid Storage Technology says my SATA transfer rate is only 3 Gb/s.

My laptop is a fairly recent model (Apr 2011, Sony VPC SB18GG), so I assume it should be capable of 6Gb/s transfer speed.

Crucial's website also states my laptop supports SATA 3-6 Gb/s speed.

I tried calling Sony Support to verify but their "technician" doesn't even know what I'm talking about. :(

Anyone installed on laptop before and can advise?

Thanks! :s13:
 

jtjt00

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
17,660
Reaction score
510
Run cpuz to check the mobo chipset, then google for the chipset spec.
 

watzup_ken

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2003
Messages
25,670
Reaction score
2,123
Has anyone used this on their laptop before?

I ran AS SSD benchmarks and my score was 556 (around half of other scores posted online) and transfer speeds ~250mbs (half of plextor's advertised top speeds). Intel Rapid Storage Technology says my SATA transfer rate is only 3 Gb/s.

My laptop is a fairly recent model (Apr 2011, Sony VPC SB18GG), so I assume it should be capable of 6Gb/s transfer speed.

Crucial's website also states my laptop supports SATA 3-6 Gb/s speed.

I tried calling Sony Support to verify but their "technician" doesn't even know what I'm talking about. :(

Anyone installed on laptop before and can advise?

Thanks! :s13:

This model should be running Intel Sandy Bridge processor with HM65 Express chipset. I believe it should be capable of SATA3 speed, unless Sony did not implement it. Not sure if this is a driver issue.
 

midautumn

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
135
Reaction score
0
DO NOT BUY SONY VAIO

Run cpuz to check the mobo chipset, then google for the chipset spec.

This model should be running Intel Sandy Bridge processor with HM65 Express chipset. I believe it should be capable of SATA3 speed, unless Sony did not implement it. Not sure if this is a driver issue.

Thank you for your help.

I have verified and it is HM65. No issues with the physical hardware. Problem lies with Sony - they removed Sata 3 support after their new BIOS update, because it makes no difference in speeds for regular hard disks. However, in this age of ssd popularity this presents a real problem for upgraders. This affects (at least) all SA, SB and SC models, worldwide. Unless you flash and revert to the earlier bios version nothing can be done at this point. People have contacted Sony regarding this matter but it has fallen on deaf ears.

Moral of story: Do not buy Sony Vaio if you want to run ssd on Sata 3 at 6Gb/s speeds. It's simply not possible, unless you flash your bios (at the very real risk of bricking the laptop completely). I'm just helping to spread the word; hopefully Sony will respond when enough people stop buying their laptops.
 

watzup_ken

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2003
Messages
25,670
Reaction score
2,123
That is poor support from Sony. I believe they messed up the BIOS update therefore, causing this issue. But to be honest, the best part of an SSD is the response time, so you can still enjoy the fast response even with a limited transfer speed. Just enjoy it man. ;)
 

Mem2003

Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2003
Messages
440
Reaction score
1
Mobile CPU and chipset for Intel 2nd generation (e.g. i7-2620m),

By right, suppose to support up to 2ports of Sata3 6Gb/s.
?? Does it supports USB3.0 and How many? {Intel chipsets does NOT integrated with USB 3.0}
Usually, it comes with:
- 1 Sata2/3 port for CD/DVD reader/writer
- 1 Sats2/3 port for 2.5" HDD 5400rpm {You replace to SSD}
-?? USB3.0 ports support {for connect ext. HDD, etc with super high speed}
-?? Media Card Reader support {USB 3.0 speed if you use a 95MB/s card}
No issues with the physical hardware.
But Problem lies with most Brand's maker (NOT only SONY, others also) does NOT enable the Sata3 6Gb/s on the maker's BIOS for Intel 2nd generation mobile CPU + chipset.
{So Sata2 speed for your replace to SSD from 2.5" HDD}
-??Hours on Battery, CPU speed(low on battery, high on AC supply), temperature/heat/Fan, etc.








===========================
...transfer speeds ~250MB/s (half of plextor's advertised top speeds).
Intel Rapid Storage Technology says my SATA transfer rate is only 3 Gb/s.

My laptop is a fairly recent model (Apr 2011, Sony VPC SB18GG), ...
....
==============================
FYI: Quote"

On January 31, 2011, Intel issued a recall on all 67-series motherboards due to a flaw in the Cougar Point Chipset.
e.g.
BD82HM65 (PCH HM65) Mobile Home
BD82HM67 (PCH HM67) Mobile Home
BD82QM67 (PCH QM67) Mobile Office
BD82QS67 (PCH QS67) Mobile SFF
BD82UM67 (PCH UM67) Ultra Mobile



A hardware problem, in which the chipset's SATA-II ports may fail over time, cause failure of connection to SATA-II devices, though data is not at risk. Intel claims that this problem will affect only 5% of users over 3 years, however, heavier I/O workloads can exacerbate the problem.



Intel stopped production of flawed B2 stepping chipsets and began producing B3 stepping chipsets with the silicon fix. Shipping of these new chipsets started on 14 February 2011 and Intel estimated full recovery volume in April 2011.
Options ranged from swapping for B3 motherboards to product refunds.

Sandy Bridge processor sales were temporarily on hold, as one cannot use the CPU without a motherboard. However, processor release dates were not affected. After two weeks, Intel continued shipping some chipsets, but manufacturers had to agree to a set of terms that will prevent customers from encountering the bug.

=====================================
Panther Point is the codename of a PCH in Intel 7 Series chipsets for mobile and desktop. It is most closely associated with Ivy Bridge processors. These chipsets have integrated USB 3.0.
 
Last edited:

watzup_ken

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2003
Messages
25,670
Reaction score
2,123
You purchase your laptop immediately after Sandy Bridge processor was released? This SATA3 bug only happened to the first batch and Intel did issue a massive recall for that. Therefore, I believe all manufacturers would have recalled the affected batches as well.
 

midautumn

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
135
Reaction score
0
You purchase your laptop immediately after Sandy Bridge processor was released?

Yes I believe so, almost immediately.

This SATA3 bug only happened to the first batch and Intel did issue a massive recall for that. Therefore, I believe all manufacturers would have recalled the affected batches as well.

I'm most probably the first batch then, but didn't know of Intel's recall. Sony also did not contact me for any recalls. Would you happen to know where to find Intel's press release for the recall so I can read for more information?


A hardware problem, in which the chipset's SATA-II ports may fail over time, cause failure of connection to SATA-II devices, though data is not at risk. Intel claims that this problem will affect only 5% of users over 3 years, however, heavier I/O workloads can exacerbate the problem.

Intel stopped production of flawed B2 stepping chipsets and began producing B3 stepping chipsets with the silicon fix. Shipping of these new chipsets started on 14 February 2011 and Intel estimated full recovery volume in April 2011.
Options ranged from swapping for B3 motherboards to product refunds.

Sandy Bridge processor sales were temporarily on hold, as one cannot use the CPU without a motherboard. However, processor release dates were not affected. After two weeks, Intel continued shipping some chipsets, but manufacturers had to agree to a set of terms that will prevent customers from encountering the bug.

From what I understand from overseas threads on this issue, people were blasting Sony for removing Sata 3 support after the Bios update. So I'm presuming Sata 3 did in fact work before the update.

I'm not sure about other laptop manufacturers; not all models back then (Sony included) supported Sata 3 so it's a non-issue for some. The contentious issue here is Sata 3 was initially enabled on this particular model, but became disabled after Sony's Bios update. Hence many users were upset.

If the reason to disable Sata 3 was really related to Intel's recall, and Sony chose to limit I/O loads instead of replacing the affected motherboard, then I am even more disappointed with Sony's aftersales support now.

Btw, I have a USB 3.0 port. It should be working cos transfer speeds are much faster than the other 2 USB 2.0 ports. Haha
 

AndrikAsh

Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2013
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
Yes I believe so, almost immediately.



I'm most probably the first batch then, but didn't know of Intel's recall. Sony also did not contact me for any recalls. Would you happen to know where to find Intel's press release for the recall so I can read for more information?




From what I understand from overseas threads on this issue, people were blasting Sony for removing Sata 3 support after the Bios update. So I'm presuming Sata 3 did in fact work before the update.

I'm not sure about other laptop manufacturers; not all models back then (Sony included) supported Sata 3 so it's a non-issue for some. The contentious issue here is Sata 3 was initially enabled on this particular model, but became disabled after Sony's Bios update. Hence many users were upset.

If the reason to disable Sata 3 was really related to Intel's recall, and Sony chose to limit I/O loads instead of replacing the affected motherboard, then I am even more disappointed with Sony's aftersales support now.

Btw, I have a USB 3.0 port. It should be working cos transfer speeds are much faster than the other 2 USB 2.0 ports. Haha

Glad to know that you're still enjoying your Plextor instead haha, I actually think the difference of running it on sata 2 and sata3 is very minimal as it is like what others have mentioned, we are more towards the responsive time than the transfer speed itself.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top