Proposal Ring - Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

highlader

Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2004
Messages
1,785
Reaction score
0
Looking for proposal ring, 3.5k plus... Prefer lee hwa or soo kee. Any to reocmmend????

Go buy during promo ba..
but 3.5k normally get up to 0.43BR but lower grade n colour.
If go for lower grades n lesser branding can easily get 0.5 or even 0.7 for super cheap promo warehouse sale..

BR n DR is never cheap. 0.5BR with F VSi 1 can set u back by 6k easily nowadays.
 

hwmook

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2002
Messages
25,291
Reaction score
1,713
Go buy during promo ba..
but 3.5k normally get up to 0.43BR but lower grade n colour.
If go for lower grades n lesser branding can easily get 0.5 or even 0.7 for super cheap promo warehouse sale..

BR n DR is never cheap. 0.5BR with F VSi 1 can set u back by 6k easily nowadays.

I was looking at a 0.51 E VS1 at Jann Paul, $4150, how did you get $6k for something less? I eventually settle on a 0.611 G VVS1 for $5200 and $550 ring setting = $5850.

While i was there, i was handed a 0.95ct that was already set on the ring for us to see how the final product would look like after its set. The person serving us didn't even realise the diamond on that ring is a 0.95ct, he seem suprised that its a 0.95ct. That rock doesn't even seem bigger or as nice as the 0.611ct rock we picked. That's 0.95ct is a run of the mill ring from House of Hung and it really show you that the cut of the diamond is very important, a 1ct of poor quality will not replace 0.6ct of top quality.
 

JuveZzZ

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2001
Messages
25,548
Reaction score
43
Too bad my girl only want B. Rose,

Trying to see if there is

0.5c, VS1 or 2, Color H @ $4.2k to 4.5.

or

0.4c, VS 1 or 2, Color G or F @ $3.8k.

Which is better? Size or Color more imp?
 

ses009

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
823
Reaction score
11
Too bad my girl only want B. Rose,

Trying to see if there is

0.5c, VS1 or 2, Color H @ $4.2k to 4.5.

or

0.4c, VS 1 or 2, Color G or F @ $3.8k.

Which is better? Size or Color more imp?
To choose between Color G or H, I would choose higher carat and go for H instead since not much difference in color difference.
 

hwmook

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2002
Messages
25,291
Reaction score
1,713
Too bad my girl only want B. Rose,

Trying to see if there is

0.5c, VS1 or 2, Color H @ $4.2k to 4.5.

or

0.4c, VS 1 or 2, Color G or F @ $3.8k.

Which is better? Size or Color more imp?

The price you quoted include settings?
 

Sta5is

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2012
Messages
445
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help to check the scope images and see if it is a good buy.

Why is there a blue and orange hue in the H&A scope image?
and what does the black triangle in the aset scope meant?

Thanks!

0.58 E vvs2
Super Ideal.
~5k.

24qljqw.jpg


16hrsc1.jpg


e0pj89.jpg


2hn732f.jpg


8vnhaw.jpg


29mkhm1.jpg
 
Last edited:

tk

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
8,511
Reaction score
314
Too bad my girl only want B. Rose,

Trying to see if there is

0.5c, VS1 or 2, Color H @ $4.2k to 4.5.

or

0.4c, VS 1 or 2, Color G or F @ $3.8k.

Which is better? Size or Color more imp?

imho, go for the 0.5c.. :)
 

Lucask83

Junior Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2014
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help to check the scope images and see if it is a good buy.

Why is there a blue and orange hue in the H&A scope image?
and what does the black triangle in the aset scope meant?

Thanks!

0.58 E vvs2
Super Ideal.
~5k.

24qljqw.jpg


16hrsc1.jpg


e0pj89.jpg


2hn732f.jpg


8vnhaw.jpg


29mkhm1.jpg

Looks good. Anw think those are just reflections
 

xtwis7

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Messages
21,848
Reaction score
597
For those who were aware of the vivo diamonds case, justice has been served. Front page of home section man. JP can also finally close this case.
 

tk

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
8,511
Reaction score
314
For those who were aware of the vivo diamonds case, justice has been served. Front page of home section man. JP can also finally close this case.

curious.. wat did vivo post to defame JP?
 

jz1901

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2001
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
curious.. wat did vivo post to defame JP?

I'm curious to find out too. It's been 5yrs since I last entered this forum. I was one of vivo supporters & customer in e past until I became my own diamond retailer.
 

wildfire11

Junior Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2013
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
wow, didnt expect JP to actually sue Vivo. i happened to be one of those around when it happened, as i was shopping around for which jeweller to go to. there was already some banning going on when it was detected.. luckily i didn't listen to them.. now a satisfied customer of JP and waiting for my ring to arrive!!
 

tk

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
8,511
Reaction score
314
I'm curious to find out too. It's been 5yrs since I last entered this forum.

U can search this thread and still see the posts by "feitonglong"... ;)

Wonder what hwz did to Xjedi who sold his moderator account to Vivo..
 

SpeedWeed

Master Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2002
Messages
4,344
Reaction score
0
Singapore News | Politics | Weather | Crime

Desperate to sink a competitor, a jewellery company resorted to buying accounts from users of a popular Internet forum and using them to post comments casting doubts on its competitor's products.

On Feb 25, Vivo Diamonds was ordered by a court to pay rival company JannPaul $85,000 in damages and costs.

It is the first reported case of a company being found liable for online defamation made through a third party.

In October 2012, Vivo posted an advertisement on the online forum Gumtree titled "Make Money. Sell your hardwarezone forum userid". Up to $200 was promised for accounts over three years old.

Vivo received a total of 98 e-mail messages in response to to the advertisement. Of these, Vivo picked two accounts - "feitonglong" and "sacredsoul" - which, according to court documents, were used to make "serious allegations" against JannPaul.

Using the "feitonglong" handle, Vivo posted three messages on Hardwarezone under the thread "Wedding Bells, Proposal Ring Part 2" which claimed that a diamond ring purchased by the user and his fiancee was of "poor craftsmanship".

He said that the $8,000 diamond ring had been worn for only five months and that JannPaul "should be responsible" as the diamond had fallen off due to shoddy handiwork. He also added that his fiancee was devastated and he did not think he would dare to patronise JannPaul again.

Separately, under the name of "sacredsoul", Vivo posted six messages, this time making claims that JannPaul had engaged in deception or misrepresented its products, by removing inclusions - which are impurities in a diamond - and reshaping the heart and arrow designs of a diamond in photographs sent to him.

Part of his posts read: "The amount of contrast in the photos is disturbing. It would be better to request from them a non-edited photo of the real diamond and compare the difference."

Another read: "Editing the photos, removing the undesirable to create beauty and attraction, that to me is just not right."

Vivo had also purchased a third Hardwarezone account - that of forum moderator "Xjedi" - to delete replies from JannPaul, as well as ban its accounts, to "skew the Hardwarezone forums to its advantage".

Vivo's actions came to light after JannPaul hired a digital forensic specialist to investigate the identity of the forum users behind the defamatory comments.

With the help of RP Digital Security and Gumtree, JannPaul contacted individuals who responded to the advertisement, as well as tracked down the IP address of the advertiser behind the advertisement - which was discovered to be Vivo.

The court also granted an injunction to JannPaul, restraining Vivo from further writing, printing or publishing of the messages made under "feitonglong" and "sacredsoul" or similar words that would be defamatory to the former.

The co-founder of JannPaul, Ms Jann Tan, called the past few months "extremely hard and stressful".

"These defamatory posts undermined the trust consumers have in our brand," said Ms Tan. "We are relieved that this issue has finally come to an end and that our names have been cleared".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top