Roboadvisor: Stashaway vs Smartly Performance

duhduhduh

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Messages
14,966
Reaction score
1,161
Why pay them extra money (in the form of management fees) to invest in ETFs?

You can invest in ETFs yourself.

I hold the same view too, maybe I am just too old-fashion minded. But I thought that these Robo-Investors are just additional middlemen, but helping you with managing your portfolio.

But question, when the robo AI help you to enter in and out of the funds they have on their platform, fees are included as well right?
 

crystalnox

Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2006
Messages
8,728
Reaction score
2,323
I hold the same view too, maybe I am just too old-fashion minded. But I thought that these Robo-Investors are just additional middlemen, but helping you with managing your portfolio.

But question, when the robo AI help you to enter in and out of the funds they have on their platform, fees are included as well right?
Yup, still have to foot the ETF fees. https://www.stashaway.sg/r/stashaways-etf-selection

I prefer and enjoy managing my own portfolio myself too, but I guess the majority out there aren't interested. Robo-investors allow them to automate investing at lower costs with set risk targets, which beats approaching a "financial advisor" and getting pushed to buy expensive mutual funds that generally under perform the market.
 

blurpandasg2014

Master Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2014
Messages
2,675
Reaction score
414
Seems like smartly outperforming stash.

Still under water. Thanks for the info
Actually this comparison is not so apple to apple...

Based on the allocation, smartly portfolio 10 is more equivalent to stashaway portfolio 24-28.

The current portfolio that I am on is portfolio 36 which is the most risky in the lot. Since smartly do not have such super risky portfolio like stashaway, the best I can put is smartly portfolio 10 in this comparison
 

halocast

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2005
Messages
58,496
Reaction score
1,751
Actually this comparison is not so apple to apple...

Based on the allocation, smartly portfolio 10 is more equivalent to stashaway portfolio 24-28.

The current portfolio that I am on is portfolio 36 which is the most risky in the lot. Since smartly do not have such super risky portfolio like stashaway, the best I can put is smartly portfolio 10 in this comparison

If smartly portfolio 10 is more equivalent to stashaway portfolio 24-28.

Than why not use it? So u get a better comparison? Curious.
 

blurpandasg2014

Master Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2014
Messages
2,675
Reaction score
414
If smartly portfolio 10 is more equivalent to stashaway portfolio 24-28.

Than why not use it? So u get a better comparison? Curious.
Actually, there are 3 parts to this experiment

Part 1

I compared a balance portfolio of smartly (5/10)vs stashaway (16) and stashaway proved more superior

Part 2

I did a comparison of stashaway 28 vs smartly (10/10) and showed that for similar allocation, stashaway almost always performed better

Part 3

Currently, the portfolio is comparing how a portfolio heavily weighted on equity would perform vs smartly (10/10) which is actually a 70/30 portfolio
 
Last edited:

halocast

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2005
Messages
58,496
Reaction score
1,751
seems like stashaway finally in the lead?

and you seem to be closer to your invested sum already.
 

satomoto

Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2017
Messages
137
Reaction score
3
It's not performance related but maybe something to think about.

StashAway and AutoWealth are MAS licensed, Smartly is not (I think they are piggybacking the license with another company).

AutoWealth's custodianship with Saxo is under the investor's name - which means that if the **** hits the fan, we can claim it from Saxo directly.

Please don't take my word for it as I've only research them but have yet to put money, though I plan to.
 

halocast

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2005
Messages
58,496
Reaction score
1,751
It's not performance related but maybe something to think about.

StashAway and AutoWealth are MAS licensed, Smartly is not (I think they are piggybacking the license with another company).

AutoWealth's custodianship with Saxo is under the investor's name - which means that if the **** hits the fan, we can claim it from Saxo directly.

Please don't take my word for it as I've only research them but have yet to put money, though I plan to.

Stashaway is not? :s11:

From their web

A Custodian Account via Saxo Capital Markets for your securities
A DBS Trust Account for when we first receive your deposits

"Even in a bankruptcy event, funds held in a trust or custodian account cannot be touched, as they belong to the customer – not to StashAway."
 
Last edited:

tipsyhs

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2016
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
So is it more advisable to invest with a balanced portfolio or an aggressive portfolio? (For both platform)
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top