company may not be struggling, but outsourcing, u dunno, since they retained 3 pinoy
but still any reason to wack ts till this extend ?
And how do u know company happy to let him go? He's still there means he's valued
do u live a life of assumptions?
Well yes, I assume things often, and in this case the things TS did not mentioned what he deemed is unfair termination.
Did I whack him? I disagree. I mainly made 3 statements, one to share that I never had the same mentality as TS when I see the company downsizing. Even if the downsizing is due to outsourcing and the bosses earned more profits, I maintain that I will not think that it is justified to bring government into it. I may curse and swear behind the bosses back, maybe stay on if the remuneration for me is good enough.
I will also do what I "advised" TS (in my third statement), to find a new job if I find no more prospect in staying on. This is common sense to me. I don't feel that I am whacking him with it, I am just stating what I think most people will think of if they are treated unjustly in a company.
For the second statement on I don't know where TS get his sense of entitlement from, I admit I assumed he is one of the strawberry generation who assumed employers owed them a living. I may be wrong and I do apologize if TS can clarify the situation. If TS really have that mentality that employers owe him a living, I hope sharing my opinion of him will be a wake up call to him.
Why do I think company is happy to let him go? They are downsizing and if TS have to worry about being terminated, he should be in a dispensable position. Wouldn't the company be happy if a dispensable employee resign on his own, don't need them to "dirty" their hands? If the company know TS is trying to get the government to deal with them, I think they might even throw a party when he resign.