STI ETF

hkchew03

Master Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Messages
2,585
Reaction score
551
Wow ES3 10 years annualized return is 1.73% -https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/quote/ES3.SI/performance/

It's not encouraging at all... Thinking of adding local index etf, but it's not that encouraging (less currency risk and withholding dividend charges as compared to buying ETF such as VT, FTEC)

What are you expecting during a time like this? Most stock still 20% lower than pre-covid...

Posted from PCWX using SM-T720
 

Kojo0403

Senior Member
Joined
May 7, 2020
Messages
1,041
Reaction score
236
ES3 was incepted in 2002 while G3B was incepted in 2009

ES3 has larger fund size S$950M vs G3B at S$300M and on-screen trading liquidity.

ES3 typically has bid-ask spread between S$0.003 - S$0.006 while G3B has bid-ask spread around S$0.01. Hence you can save like 0.10% to 0.20% when trading into ES3 compared to G3B.

Expense ratio is pretty consistent for both at 0.30% hence over the long-run there should not be any issue.
 

Kojo0403

Senior Member
Joined
May 7, 2020
Messages
1,041
Reaction score
236
What are you expecting during a time like this? Most stock still 20% lower than pre-covid...

Posted from PCWX using SM-T720

True.. and its probably a fact that Singapore market has claimed to be undervalued by some of the companies that were delisted and go on to list elsewhere. Hence if the stock bubble were to burst, most probably your draw-down in ES3 will not be as bad as FTEC or XLK.

Personally I do hold XLK and LG9 (MSCI China) but it's always good to balance off with STI for SGD income and not over-exposed in US.
 

Iyarash11

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
May 1, 2019
Messages
10,324
Reaction score
1,267
in SG, is it better to buy STI ETF or bank stock to keep for next 3 years
 

kehyi4

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
34
probably the usual approach, distribute the risk
mixed of all 4, 3 banks and sti etf
erm, you know that STI is about half made up of 3 banks +singtel, right?

so how does buying largely the same thing twice "distribute the risk"? :s11:
 
Last edited:

Panerex

Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2010
Messages
6,575
Reaction score
117
ES3 has larger fund size S$950M vs G3B at S$300M and on-screen trading liquidity.

ES3 typically has bid-ask spread between S$0.003 - S$0.006 while G3B has bid-ask spread around S$0.01. Hence you can save like 0.10% to 0.20% when trading into ES3 compared to G3B.

Expense ratio is pretty consistent for both at 0.30% hence over the long-run there should not be any issue.


Does ES3 have better dividend yield?
 

pawn_king

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2005
Messages
1,472
Reaction score
153
Wow ES3 10 years annualized return is 1.73% -https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/quote/ES3.SI/performance/

It's not encouraging at all... Thinking of adding local index etf, but it's not that encouraging (less currency risk and withholding dividend charges as compared to buying ETF such as VT, FTEC)

well STI 10-yr return was 9.2% in 2018 and 9.4% in 2019

What a big difference!

this shows that entry point (for lump sum investment) and exit point (for DCA/lump sum) very important!
 

Slowdown

Master Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2003
Messages
3,619
Reaction score
894
Very possible. STI fluctuation is +/- 15% (against capital). I have been invested in the ETF for more than six years via RSP and when I look at my closing balance each year I can see the trend.

Against my capital investment at the end of each year:
2014: +4.5%
2015: -9.2% (>15% Loss)
2016: -5.6% (> 4% Grain)
2017: 11% (> 15% Grain)
2018: -1% (> 12% Loss)
2019: 2.8% (> 3% Gain)
2020 (to date): -20% (> 22% Loss)

I did not considered dividend received, just capital gain/loss. It is true that the point of entry and exit can greatly impact the returns. It can be argued because my calculation is based on RSP and lump sum investment may be different. I dunno. But from my personal stats I can see the fluctuation. I am not sure why you said the STI had minimal growth. If we look at just growth alone then it is true that STI did not grow much. However the fluctuation in between can kill us or help us make some good returns.


These stats don't seem correct. As far as I know, STI has had minimal growth in the last 10 years.
 
Last edited:

crystalnox

Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2006
Messages
8,730
Reaction score
2,323
Very possible. STI fluctuation is +/- 15% (against capital). I have been invested in the ETF for more than six years via RSP and when I look at my closing balance each year I can see the trend.

Against my capital investment at the end of each year:
2014: +4.5%
2015: -9.2% (>15% Loss)
2016: -5.6% (> 4% Grain)
2017: 11% (> 15% Grain)
2018: -1% (> 12% Loss)
2019: 2.8% (> 3% Gain)
2020 (to date): >20% (> 22% Loss)

I did not considered dividend received, just capital gain/loss. It is true that the point of entry and exit can greatly impact the returns. It can be argued because my calculation is based on RSP and lump sum investment may be different. I dunno. But from my personal stats I can see the fluctuation. I am not sure why you said the STI had minimal growth. If we look at just growth alone then it is true that STI did not grow much. However the fluctuation in between can kill us or help us make some good returns.
Similar-ish to my own results when I used XIRR to calculate gains/losses on a yearly basis.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top