No? The MNCs are here to take advantage of SG's low taxes, rule of law, good infrastructure and cheap/good workforce, why would Singtel doing poorly affect a company like Apple or Google?
Most MNCs dun set up shop in SG to take advantage of SG's tiny market (read above), the office here usually serve as a regional base to tap into the SEA market and sometimes, the greater China market. Anyway all these is irrelevant... I dun see how investing in local companies is going to change anything, it will fail if its bad, investing in a bad company isn't going to make it good.
Guess you aren't seeing it still. Firstly I said "in addition to many many other reasons".
Secondly...
have you asked yourself why we have low taxes? If the economy is not doing well, which resulted in lower tax revenue, and because the economy isn't doing well, the government have to step up aid to the people but they don't have as much tax revenue for them to do so, what do you think they will do next?
Same goes why why do you think Singapore has good rule of law, good infrastructure and cheap/good workforce?
If Singtel or other similar firms can't earn enough to invest in infrastructure, do you think we will still have good infrastructure?
Singtel doing poorly might not have a direct impact on like Apple or Google, but you don't see the greater downstream repercussion? Those big local companies employ a large chunk of the local work force. If they don't do well, and have to retrench people, and Singapore has high unemployment, which resulted in depressed consumer spending, which in turn have much greater repercussions.
As I said, in terms of investment, those people who are more well read might find way better investments out there as compared to STI ETF, but one shouldn't talk down (curse) the STI ETF just because they aren't getting the the returns they want from it, unless one, or friends and family doesn't work in Singapore. That's my point
This is a joke right? If you know there are better investments out there then why put your money in this bottomless pit? The point of this discussion is not to figure out if it makes sense to put more money into a bad investment, its to figure out if ES3 is a bad investment.
Well on a theoretical basis, you are right, why not invest in something else that is better.
But the world doesn't always operates on theory. There could be many other reasons, so hence "different strokes for different folks"? People want to invest in STI ETF because it is a "bad investment" is their problem no? Why you so angst for them?