I'm compelled to turn all notifications for my account, can't stand all these harrassmentsI don't see how he can like 10 of my posts from diff threads in the past hour all in the same minute.
I'm compelled to turn all notifications for my account, can't stand all these harrassmentsI don't see how he can like 10 of my posts from diff threads in the past hour all in the same minute.


.A ban sounds good to meI do not think it is a good idea to remove any particular users access to any features. It's akin to some middle eastern countries where thieves get their hands chopped off; Sure it removes the problem, but is it really the best solution?
I think it sets a dangerous precedence. Today you remove one user's ability to react to posts, tomorrow are you going to remove another user's ability to post smilies?.
If someone is breaking the rules or causing a nuisance, there is always the good old warn, infract, or ban.
and perhaps the feature itself could be designed in such a way so as to prevent abuse.
https://www.mycarforum.com/forums/topic/2691364-guide-to-point-system/
I do not think it is a good idea to remove any particular users access to any features.
So? I wrote a whole post, why are you quoting me out of context?It's a clear cut abuse and spam.
Who knows what other features they can take away from you.Don't need ban also.
Chiu can disable a particular user's ability to 'like'?
What wrong with taking away that feature from these spammers. Its not chopping off their hands. If you want to use an analogy, its depriving them of their weapons.Who knows what other features they can take away from you.
There is no such thing as a perfect analogy. But the technicalities of the analogy are not the point of discussion.What wrong with taking away that feature from these spammers. Its not chopping off their hands. If you want to use an analogy, its depriving them of their weapons.
You're in the forum for long and not aware?Who knows what other features they can take away from you.
There is no such thing as a perfect analogy, true. But it's a fallacy to treat all analogies as the same. The technicalities do matter.There is no such thing as a perfect analogy. But the technicalities of the analogy are not the point of discussion.
Anyway, the advocates for chopping of hands as punishment probably use depriving of weapons as an analogy to support their cause too.
Gib chan...people old liao brain kennot function properly to learn new stuffsI just add those spammers to my ignore list and since then I haven't received any notifications from their "likes". I still get from other users though.
Sure the technicalities do matter.There is no such thing as a perfect analogy, true. But it's a fallacy to treat all analogies as the same. The technicalities do matter.
Sure. So banning is better? Its one of the existing methods which u had listed and asked why it cannot be used.Sure the technicalities do matter.
But the key is whether or not it is a good fit, at least so much so as to the point that is being made.
And the gist is this: This is a universal feature that everyone has. To deprive some people of the feature is to limit their normal abilities, putting them at a disadvantage compared to the rest of the population.
The fact is that they are going to have to amongst a population where they are less able than everyone else.
So I don't think I had wrongly applied my analogy, the key elements are what it is.
as requestedBtw can like my post? Up my notification count pl0x
can you elaborate why are you "compelled" to turn on all notifications for your account? will something terrible happen if you turn it off?I'm compelled to turn all notifications for my account, can't stand all these harrassments
