That's because there is not much difference in terms of PPI. 100+ PPI is really just average these days, so there is not much difference.
If you look at the flagship mobile and laptop, the PPI is a few hundred, and it looks much sharper.
Screen manufacturers are not prioritizing monitors, what can we do.
yup my samsung s23 ultra PPI, in which i just googled...wah.., 501 ppi.
but anyway 27 inch 1440P with the color vibrancy of oled already look good. actually dont say oled, even 27 inch VA panel has good color reproduction. the contrast ratio also not bad. Just that VA not so good for fast moving action due to ghosting but to be honest when i was using a VA panel with a 165hz refresh rate, i didnt notice the ghosting even in FPS games though.
i guess alot of times, these types of issues are blown way out of proportion by youtube reviewers in which they slow down the content, to elevate the cons. Real world usage probably cant even notice.
i am sure no one can differentiate 1ms gtg response times of a LCD vs a 0.1ms gtg response time of an oled in real world usage. dont say 1ms, even 2ms dont think human eye can notice.
Maybe its a plot by technology manufacturers to upsell IT products by showing us spec sheets accomplishment in numbers. Real world usage cant see the difference at all but we are victims of marketing, we easily swayed to purchase high end products. i admit i am one of them~