The Almighty Z5!

rssd21

Supremacy Member
Joined
May 1, 2011
Messages
7,258
Reaction score
224
actually Sony does have very good phone. not sure why everyone going for Samsung?? marketing?? Samsung skin is tooooo heavy. and don't even have the double tap features.

Some people are still surprised to learn that Sony makes smartphones. :D
 

amazingone

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2015
Messages
66,739
Reaction score
6,155
actually Sony does have very good phone. not sure why everyone going for Samsung?? marketing?? Samsung skin is tooooo heavy. and don't even have the double tap features.
Marketing is Sony's Achilles heel, truth to be told.
Samsung is strong in its marketing, that's why even with people complaining its bloated TouchWiz or its recent microSD and removal battery saga, if Samsung were to spam their advertisement with the pros of their phone, like a refreshed beautiful design, fast processor etc., people will still eat into it and get their phone.

If Sony were to put in more marketing on their phone, maybe like better camera for their Z5 series, first 4K screen for phone for Z5 Premium, ultra-thin 0.8mm bezel for C5 Ultra etc., maybe more people will be interested to get a Sony phone.
:)

Sent from my Rice phone using GAGT
 

b3nji23

Master Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2005
Messages
3,134
Reaction score
0
Good news. Just received confirmation to collect my z5 this sat for staff pre-order. Feeling excited hehe :D
 

shager

Master Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
4,171
Reaction score
689
We hear the same comments some years ago.

But they have yet to be profitable in their mobile division.
It can't go on forever.

Personally I hope they turnaround. It would be a shame if we lost Sony.
 

yhw22

Master Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2002
Messages
4,906
Reaction score
358
We hear the same comments some years ago.

This time round they set a deadline by next year end, if no profit will shutdown it. :(


Should be launching this weekend.

Based on FB: Want to make your October that extra bit more fun? Come check out our latest Xperia™ Z5 and α7S II anytime from 17th Oct till 1st Nov 2015 and stand to win up to S$100 worth of Sony Store vouchers* with every S$688 spent. It doesn’t get easier than this!

*Terms and Conditions Apply*
 

manutdonline

Junior Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
Sales person I spoke to at singtel retailer said z5 should be available this Saturday. No word yet on the compact.
 
Last edited:

hush66

Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2001
Messages
6,703
Reaction score
0
I already said previously that launch will be 17th Oct but no one seemed to be take attention. :p
 

fatangel

Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
8,906
Reaction score
394
Doesnt hurt to give people more option (LG G4), JPEG, JPEG + Raw, Raw:s22:

Actually how many will use raw? Maybe some will use for a while and after that back to jpg. Number continue is very very small and the money use to make raw available is not justify for the business return.
How often will you use raw? What is the purpose? Time spend on processing the pic with it?
 

waterballoon

Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Messages
6,342
Reaction score
220
That is the problem with most people. Asking for quality in phone camera but not wanting to pay for dedicated camera. :D

stop. please just stop. sorry in advance if I offend you but really, stop.

if camera experience is not important in a smart phone, we won't see the brilliant performances from Samsung, LG and Apple. HTC wouldn't bother screwing itself with "Ultrapixel". Google wouldn't bother with the huge sensor size for their new Nexus.

of course we should expect good quality in phone camera.

1) it's Sony. these guys provide the sensors to best OEMs this year for camera performance (Apple, LG, Samsung).

2) it's a new camera sensor. admit it, the G Lens nonsense from Z1 to Z3+ is garbage. on paper it sounds powerful, but in reality Those phones are the lousiest flagships in camera performance. with a new sensor and so much hype with Hybrid AF etc, obviously we would want better performance.

3) it's a flagship. Z5 is on par in prices with S6 at launch, and even more expensive than the G4. in any case, its creation is to fight with S6/M9/G4/6S for a spot in the premium tier. why would I not want the camera to on par with the other players? what's so different about Sony that I must compromise camera performance from the king of camera sensors manufacturing?

so wake up and stop pretending like it's okay for Sony Z-Series to produce shitty photos. it's not. not in 2015.

---

anyway, seems that the Z5 series camera is a lot more capable than Z3. The Android Authority blind camera shoot-out doesn't seem to be too fair.. Sony always had a much wider FoV so comparing a wider shot to its competitors isn't on the same level already (wider lens is also why there's a lot of blur on the extreme sides/corners)
 

rssd21

Supremacy Member
Joined
May 1, 2011
Messages
7,258
Reaction score
224
Actually how many will use raw? Maybe some will use for a while and after that back to jpg. Number continue is very very small and the money use to make raw available is not justify for the business return.
How often will you use raw? What is the purpose? Time spend on processing the pic with it?

It is human nature to be greedy and ask for more.
After the desire is satisfied, everyone will go back and use the inferior option.

Simply ask around and see how many people use phone camera to shoot in HD, FHD or 4K, when all options are available. :s13:
 

rssd21

Supremacy Member
Joined
May 1, 2011
Messages
7,258
Reaction score
224
stop. please just stop. sorry in advance if I offend you but really, stop.

if camera experience is not important in a smart phone, we won't see the brilliant performances from Samsung, LG and Apple. HTC wouldn't bother screwing itself with "Ultrapixel". Google wouldn't bother with the huge sensor size for their new Nexus.

of course we should expect good quality in phone camera.

1) it's Sony. these guys provide the sensors to best OEMs this year for camera performance (Apple, LG, Samsung).

2) it's a new camera sensor. admit it, the G Lens nonsense from Z1 to Z3+ is garbage. on paper it sounds powerful, but in reality Those phones are the lousiest flagships in camera performance. with a new sensor and so much hype with Hybrid AF etc, obviously we would want better performance.

3) it's a flagship. Z5 is on par in prices with S6 at launch, and even more expensive than the G4. in any case, its creation is to fight with S6/M9/G4/6S for a spot in the premium tier. why would I not want the camera to on par with the other players? what's so different about Sony that I must compromise camera performance from the king of camera sensors manufacturing?

so wake up and stop pretending like it's okay for Sony Z-Series to produce shitty photos. it's not. not in 2015.

---

anyway, seems that the Z5 series camera is a lot more capable than Z3. The Android Authority blind camera shoot-out doesn't seem to be too fair.. Sony always had a much wider FoV so comparing a wider shot to its competitors isn't on the same level already (wider lens is also why there's a lot of blur on the extreme sides/corners)


People are happy when DxO said Sony phones are not producing good phone cameras.
But some people are unhappy when DxO said Z5 is currently the best performing phone camera.

If you are writing so much to prove your point, why not take some quality pictures on many phone cameras and compare side by side. :s13:

Anyway, I am lazy to engage in your fanboy war.
So if you are so hurt that Z5 is doing good, then think of it as bad since I would not comment on a phone not available in mass market now.

The smartphone is not only for camera. So many pages of posts just talking about the camera.
Maybe they are only worried about the camera.

Seems like everyone is satisfied with the performance of Sony phones, which is a good thing. :D
 

waterballoon

Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Messages
6,342
Reaction score
220
People are happy when DxO said Sony phones are not producing good phone cameras.
But some people are unhappy when DxO said Z5 is currently the best performing phone camera.

If you are writing so much to prove your point, why not take some quality pictures on many phone cameras and compare side by side. :s13:

Anyway, I am lazy to engage in your fanboy war.
So if you are so hurt that Z5 is doing good, then think of it as bad since I would not comment on a phone not available in mass market now.

The smartphone is not only for camera. So many pages of posts just talking about the camera.
Maybe they are only worried about the camera.

Seems like everyone is satisfied with the performance of Sony phones, which is a good thing. :D

you sound like an obsessed mother who is hell bent on telling the entire world that her son is a prodigy when he is average like everyone else. :)
 

joeltng

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
371
Reaction score
26
stop. please just stop. sorry in advance if I offend you but really, stop.

if camera experience is not important in a smart phone, we won't see the brilliant performances from Samsung, LG and Apple. HTC wouldn't bother screwing itself with "Ultrapixel". Google wouldn't bother with the huge sensor size for their new Nexus.

of course we should expect good quality in phone camera.

1) it's Sony. these guys provide the sensors to best OEMs this year for camera performance (Apple, LG, Samsung).

2) it's a new camera sensor. admit it, the G Lens nonsense from Z1 to Z3+ is garbage. on paper it sounds powerful, but in reality Those phones are the lousiest flagships in camera performance. with a new sensor and so much hype with Hybrid AF etc, obviously we would want better performance.

3) it's a flagship. Z5 is on par in prices with S6 at launch, and even more expensive than the G4. in any case, its creation is to fight with S6/M9/G4/6S for a spot in the premium tier. why would I not want the camera to on par with the other players? what's so different about Sony that I must compromise camera performance from the king of camera sensors manufacturing?

so wake up and stop pretending like it's okay for Sony Z-Series to produce shitty photos. it's not. not in 2015.

---

anyway, seems that the Z5 series camera is a lot more capable than Z3. The Android Authority blind camera shoot-out doesn't seem to be too fair.. Sony always had a much wider FoV so comparing a wider shot to its competitors isn't on the same level already (wider lens is also why there's a lot of blur on the extreme sides/corners)

First of all.... Camera Experience =/= Picture quality. Yes Picture quality plays a part, but things like ease of use, speed of capture, shutter lag etcetc adds up to the experience. Your entire post only hound on picture quality , which i have earlier stated is very, very subjective.

Also Personally the shittest Flagship camera to me is the HTC One Series. That one ;;; Abit sad, cause they were trying the ultra pixel thing....but... i guess execution didn;t carry out properly.
 

waterballoon

Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Messages
6,342
Reaction score
220
First of all.... Camera Experience =/= Picture quality. Yes Picture quality plays a part, but things like ease of use, speed of capture, shutter lag etcetc adds up to the experience. Your entire post only hound on picture quality , which i have earlier stated is very, very subjective.

Also Personally the shittest Flagship camera to me is the HTC One Series. That one ;;; Abit sad, cause they were trying the ultra pixel thing....but... i guess execution didn;t carry out properly.

I'm not even considering HTC when I compare image quality... poor HTC lol.

and yes camera experience and picture quality are different things. maybe I worded wrongly, but I meant the entire process - frm taking the phone out, to launching the camera, to snapping a photo, to have it saved to the gallery and finally to have it look good.

what you mentioned like ease of use, capture speed/latency are absent in Sony. let me rectify first by saying that at least from YouTube and what I've observed at 313@Somerset, Sony nailed the AF speed even without laser AF and those gimmicks, so kudos.

now my best friend, her bf, her sister and her sister's bf all are using Sony because of my persuasion but she always tells me the camera isn't good. to her (the average consumer), Sony Xperia phone cameras are slow to launch, slow at focusing and take average photos. now some fan boys won't like it but I think the perspective of a fan boy comapred to what the average consumer thinks are always world's apart.

next, how is the Xperia camera app capable of providing a holistic camera experience on a smartphone? let me give a few examples:

1) no true Manual mode. "Manual" mode tweaks a few things like ISO, WB which are weirdly negated when you switch to certain modes. but wait! you say, Apple's camera app has no Manual mode too. yeah they dont, but their Auto mode is one of the best around and do you really want Sony to be comapred to Apple? :s13:

2) small details like, exposure slider and HDR toggle are not omnipresent. you have to often dig through the settings just to find basic things like this that are already in their competitors' camera apps.

3) most frustrating of all: the extreme stupidity of why using Quick Launch = SA mode I will never understand, especially if you last used Manual mode. like ??? I don't get it

4) I agree that Sony Xperia has decent camera sensors that can take decent photos, but only if you set everything up correctly - the scene, the camera settings like scene mode, ISO, WB, HDR etc. and then finally you will get something comparable.

but look, most people just gonna point-and-shoot. this is the reality of this era and smartphones. people wanna take it out, take photos of the sunset, their dinner, their friends, their babies. photography has evolved from taking model photos and landscapes to capturing your life.

thus the average person has no technical ability to "set up" their camera like how Sony needs to be in order to be good. they only know, launch, tap, shoot. who does that the best? your answer will tell you why that particular phone is so popular.

again, I must emphasize I am not anti-Sony. I said it before, I'll say it again. I've used every Z-Series phone except the Z1 Compact and Z Ultra and I like so many things like build quality, water resistance and battery life.

but look, camera is one aspect that an OEM can never run away from and Sony sadly is horrible at it, ironically. I've said it before too that it's very frustarting because these guys DESERVE to do well but they don't.
 

haylui

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2006
Messages
29,769
Reaction score
91
everyone buy a smartphone only for its camera?
camera on a smartphone to me is just an emergency solution when I really need to take photo.

put it this way: if a professional photographer is using the best camera smartphone to do your wedding portraits... are you OK with it?
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top