Hello Sifu,
Currently am wearing progressive lenses
Rodenstock impression 2 (1.6 index ) & Pentax expert (1.6 index ) and older pair Asahi lite Masterpiece (1.6 index )
Officelens progressive
Ziess officelens Superb 1.6 index & Asahi lite Maxisov 1.56 index
in term of lens thickness ,why each lens is different ?
is it Hard lens is more thinner and soft lens much thicker?
compare to my Rodenstock and Ziess ..Rodenstock is very much thinner!
Hi!
Couple of factors that affect thickness of lenses
1. Lens material (Clear, Transition, Blue absorb) & Index (1.56, 1.61, 1.67, 1.74, Etc..)
Higher index = thinner lens | Clear lens is usually made thinner than transition/Blue absorb
2. Frame Size
smaller frame = thinner lens
3. Lens Center thickness
Thinner center = thinner lens but the lens will warp easily, causing blur/distorted vision
4. Lens Front curve
Flatter curve = Thinner lens. But too flat will cause "Fishbowl" effect, leading to headache/nausea
Have to see what is more important to you. thinner lens or comfortable lenses.
Out of all the brands above, Asahi-Lite will be slightly thicker as they place more emphasis on visual comfort than aesthetics.
Thank Optometrist
My progressive lens Rodenstock 1.6 clear frame Ic berlin 50-20-145 & Pentax 1.6 with sensity, frame Koreans 51-19-146 both lens prescription are the same R +1.75 L+ 2.25 add +2.00
but the center thickness both are not the same , is it soft lens thicker ?
sorry im a noob .
Hi OptometriesSince both are 1.6 index, the lens hardness is the same. IC! berlin frames are mostly rimlon (Meaning there's a groove in the lens for the frame to fit in) Rimlon lenses are usually thicker, otherwise it cannot hold onto the frame.
If the center thickness is less than 0.7mm difference, there should be minimal Image magnification difference to user.![]()
Hi Optometries
Final question
can i say Japanese lenses Soft lenes Asahi and Pentax for progressive are thicker compare to Germany hard lenes Rodenstock & Zeiss which are much thinner?
Dear all,
for transitions lens, is it better to go with Hoya or essilor?
Am comparing the
Hoya Nulux True form, Hoya Nulux V+ and the Essilor Transitions Gen 8.
However, each range got about $200 difference.
Can share which is more lasting? I heard they say Hoya is better and coating lasts longer.
Thank you
Hello experts..is it advisable to have 2 prescription pairs one for home and the other for work/leisure?
I was thinking when at home just use a basic lens no frills and for work/leisure photochromic+blue perhaps progressive?
Would constantly changing affect the eyes?
anyone can recommend a shop for my nearsightness problem.
hai, age is catching up.
Oh, So it works on any pair?
Oh, So it works on any pair?
Not sure is there a specific degree or other things to note.
so basically if to get prescripted pair will be better?Off the shelf readers are good for short reading time (~20mins)
Some might start experiencing eye strain/discomfort after that.
so basically if to get prescripted pair will be better?
i dont think i would like to carry a pair of reading glasses everytime i need to read. TIA
yes just started.Your presbyopia just started? Otherwise for people with higher presbyopia, they'll want to carry their reading glasses around cos bobian, can't see near.
yes just started.
is there such thing as i can get a glasses just for reading while at the same time just use normally.
thank you for your insight!yup, that would be progressive lenses. But doubt you'll be using it often, and will eventually become a reading glasses for you (Use only when you want to read) In the end pay alot but hardly use
For most people without prescription at distance, a simple pair of reading glasses would be enough.
If you have multiple focus point (E.g. look at someone 1-2m away + read on the desktop computer + reading at near) then office lens