The Watch Thread - Part 10

Status
Not open for further replies.

gaoxing84

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2004
Messages
66,764
Reaction score
2,179
But if IWC use shitty ETA means they make pretender watches for their own brand ah. Sibeh confusing.

nothing wrong with ETA actually

i love ETAs haha anywhere can service. in house service will die :s13:
 

gaoxing84

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2004
Messages
66,764
Reaction score
2,179
Hahahaha same, good movement is good movement mar.

some people just anal about ETA lor.

but if 10k watch using ETA no go la.

i think threshold for using ETA is 5k max.

5k because branding, finishing and quality must be up there.
 

indigo22

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
39,145
Reaction score
7
morning there was a discussion about Mvmt watches, and admittedly thats one of the brands which majority tend not to recommend, yet the post replying it were mature and ended well

now there is a discussion about brands, yet the tone of replies so different..

well not gonna say much, just one difference between the posts in the morning and this evening :o

#notsarcastic
#orAmI?
#hmm
 

Nakedtoes

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2002
Messages
60,368
Reaction score
3,662
took them too long la. haha and they are one company that doesn't change.
they are lucky because of their brand name.

took them years to just change the bracelet.

but a rolex is still a rolex. worldwide recognition. it's like wearing cash on your wrist.

Bracelet is bracelet.. Clasp is clasp.. Still find my 11 year old 16710 bracelet much better in workmanship and looks more mint then mine 5 year old omega seamaster bracelet. Maybe is the steel use.. Clasp wise and AR coating omega wins.
 

gaoxing84

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2004
Messages
66,764
Reaction score
2,179
Bracelet is bracelet.. Clasp is clasp.. Still find my 11 year old 16710 bracelet much better in workmanship and looks more mint then mine 5 year old omega seamaster bracelet. Maybe is the steel use.. Clasp wise and AR coating omega wins.

beg to differ on omega bracelet vs rolex bracelet (old)

the 16610 bracelet i had is kinda inferior to my 2254 bracelet.

but of course both are comfortable to me.

i even have the 1970s sub bracelet.

took them decades to change though
 

patryn33

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
23,202
Reaction score
80
According to the iwc forum, they say IWCs never lose time and are tested beyond chronometer standards. Based on my experience, my 3777 gained 1s every 3 days Which really impressed me and was one of the reasons I fell in love with the brand.
upload

That's a small sample size of all IWC owners. IMHO not statistically right to even have say 90% confidence of that's true. When a watch leaves the factory IWC not much control.

It is more impt that you have the experience. Enjoy the watch
 
Joined
Jun 9, 2016
Messages
308
Reaction score
0
That's a small sample size of all IWC owners. IMHO not statistically right to even have say 90% confidence of that's true. When a watch leaves the factory IWC not much control.

It is more impt that you have the experience. Enjoy the watch

Yup I form my opinions based on my experience. I think it's more credible. As compared to people who don't own them but make claims about them. I sold this 3777 alr tho, hoping to get the big pilot!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top