The Watch Thread - Part 12

Status
Not open for further replies.

fabiaN__

Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2001
Messages
6,320
Reaction score
24
Talked to this uncle in the train.
He was wearing rolex 1675 gmt master.
He wore it since 1968. Never change a thing.
He tot it's worth 10k and I told him way more.
If all original and with boxes.

Nice patina on the lume plots and the insert is fading to a nice light red and blue.

Nice to see these uncles wear such stuff. Been with them for so any years.
To see myself. Selling watches every few months.

The modern pieces maybe not as captivating as the old ones.

You're a serial flipper! Which one you wanna flip next?
 

MrSenG

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2013
Messages
491
Reaction score
0
Talked to this uncle in the train.
He was wearing rolex 1675 gmt master.
He wore it since 1968. Never change a thing.
He tot it's worth 10k and I told him way more.
If all original and with boxes.

Nice patina on the lume plots and the insert is fading to a nice light red and blue.

Nice to see these uncles wear such stuff. Been with them for so any years.
To see myself. Selling watches every few months.

The modern pieces maybe not as captivating as the old ones.

Please tell me you asked for a picture?

The GMT 'Pepsi' has a historical connection to pilots (especially Pam-Am). I do agree that vintage watches have a certain charm to them, but there are certain nuances that were improved on, like the introduction of quick-set date on the GMT Master 16750.

For me, I really appreciate the comfort and ease of glidelock and not forgetting, the durability of solid end links.
 

slow_mo

Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2008
Messages
6,503
Reaction score
10
actually just curious, how many people here (including the lurkers :D) are real certified divers who dive often? and what are your watches of choice? :o

dive = the one that you bloop into the water, not dive on table/play mahjong that diving

Swimming not counted right? I dive into the swimming pool.
 

Nitrile

Honorary Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2002
Messages
105,555
Reaction score
141
For me I can only wear the rolexes with latest generation bracelets. :s22:

Wanted a 16570 badly but didn't like it when I tried it on with the bracelet.

In the end decided to spend a little more on 216570. Bracelet quality surpasses my Pelagos.
 

jonleelk

Master Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
4,122
Reaction score
97
How about a Seiko diver?

+1 for Seiko Diver. Around the same price as the Ocean 1 should be this, which won't be mistaken for a Sub homage.

sbdc031-c_1024x1024.jpg
 

cyrenic

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2016
Messages
7,757
Reaction score
2,530
+1 for Seiko Diver. Around the same price as the Ocean 1 should be this, which won't be mistaken for a Sub homage.

I do love Seiko divers, but I do not understand why they do not want to use sapphire. The case size is also rather large..

(Other than SKX and Sea Urchin that I've tried so far)
 
Last edited:

gaoxing84

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2004
Messages
66,764
Reaction score
2,179
Please tell me you asked for a picture?

The GMT 'Pepsi' has a historical connection to pilots (especially Pam-Am). I do agree that vintage watches have a certain charm to them, but there are certain nuances that were improved on, like the introduction of quick-set date on the GMT Master 16750.

For me, I really appreciate the comfort and ease of glidelock and not forgetting, the durability of solid end links.

No I did not. Not very nice to ask.
If you appreciate newer stuff means you're not ready for vintage yet.
16750 is more of a transitional piece towards the gmt master 2.
I would take the 1675 anyday to a 16750.
There's a certain charm to old bracelet, the non quick set date.
 
Last edited:

slow_mo

Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2008
Messages
6,503
Reaction score
10
Please tell me you asked for a picture?

The GMT 'Pepsi' has a historical connection to pilots (especially Pam-Am). I do agree that vintage watches have a certain charm to them, but there are certain nuances that were improved on, like the introduction of quick-set date on the GMT Master 16750.

For me, I really appreciate the comfort and ease of glidelock and not forgetting, the durability of solid end links.

Agree on the Glidelock clasp and solid end link vs the stamped clasp, non solid bracelet and non solid end link.
 

babychimz

Senior Member
Joined
May 30, 2011
Messages
1,523
Reaction score
0
No I did not. Not very nice to ask.
If you appreciate newer stuff means you're not ready for vintage yet.
16750 is more of a transitional piece towards the gmt master 2.
I would take the 1675 anyday to a 16750.
There's a certain charm to old bracelet, the non quick set date.

i appreciate both vintage and modern but no money hoot both... not satki like gaoxing84

Not sure yet. Haha AP is definitely on the list next.
Will see how. Lol

hoot ah hoot

looks like SBDX019 maybe happening. LOL

hoot ah hoot
 

MrSenG

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2013
Messages
491
Reaction score
0
No I did not. Not very nice to ask.
If you appreciate newer stuff means you're not ready for vintage yet.
16750 is more of a transitional piece towards the gmt master 2.
I would take the 1675 anyday to a 16750.
There's a certain charm to old bracelet, the non quick set date.

Not sure why I'm attracted more towards the transitional models like the 16750 and 16660. Then again, I am always ready for a 5514/5517 if the right opportunity ever presents itself (like win lottery).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top