Anyone tried this micro brand watch?
![]()
![]()
Anyone tried this micro brand watch?
![]()
![]()
High 5^ same here... I came to this thread because of orient star classic. Slowly, it progressed to a rolex submariner 16800 (made in 1985) which I realised is not gonna be possible as I was preparing to propose to my wife...get a house etc...
Anyone tried this micro brand watch?
![]()
![]()
Ya. Settle down and benefit both parties is better than me selfishly hogging that 10k and benefit only myself with a Rolex. Of course if I'm single I would probably be like randomgreen buy a Rolex and pamper myself hahahaha. Better spend on a watch than to party it away eh.
Wahhh I wonder back in 1985 how much does a Sub costs.
Sent from 10 Buangkok View, Buangkok Green Medical Park using GAGT
very true... the 10K for the watch can be better used to renovate our new home and also standby for "rainy days"
maybe about 3 to 4k?!
2K for 2 x OT500, 8K for home renovation, ENUFF SAID!!

Haha why do you think I hoot a Steinhart Flieger? Cos all I need is an OT500 and the 8k goes into reno like you said
Sent from 10 Buangkok View, Buangkok Green Medical Park using GAGT
Bro I was like you...then I had a GF
Slowly Rolex >> Omega >> Damasko >> Tissot >> Steinhart
...
So yea is good to save up for something you like etc. And yea you have no commitments like bills to pay etc. But this may suddenly all change when you meet your other half. And don't forget the 11k is very useful for down payment for BTO.
Good choice for 2k. Mon-Thur OT500. Fri-Sun Flieger.Haha why do you think I hoot a Steinhart Flieger? Cos all I need is an OT500 and the 8k goes into reno like you said
Sent from 10 Buangkok View, Buangkok Green Medical Park using GAGT
Well... seems like we're all assuming randomgreen is peasant 'poor' because he is still undergraduate. Scarly spending 11k to him is like us spending $110... who knows!
Anyway yes, I already mentioned in my previous post that when purchasing a luxury item, is this luxury item really worth the money spent? Of course, one derives that 'song' feeling, that 'I finally bought this with my hard-earned money', that 'I am now one level up above the other measly peasants', that 'I finally owned my dream watch'. But we have to ask ourselves, what is the opportunity cost? Will you derive more enjoyment from purchasing something else instead?
For example, 11K cold hard cash, I could own a quite high-end gaming desktop, a school laptop, a quite high-end music player, some nice blazers, shirts, pants, towels, a good pair of spectacles, and some nice gifts for GF, and yet probably still have spare for a nice Seiko automatic watch... the list goes on...
Compare this to 11K = one Rolex watch
Which derive more satisfaction with the same amount of money? (For me it's the former because I'm a peasant)
Everything is a balance between the cash you have, and the things you really need/want in any point of life, the kind of lifestyle you want, and how much you want to reserve for future use. So just my 2 cents.
Completely understand what you're referring to as opportunity cost. Well if one doesn't sacrifice his lifestyle (clothes, meals, holidays, entertainment etc), or maybe just cutting back on those by 20% to fund his purchase, then I'll say go for it.
In addition to opportunity cost, I also think in terms of spare cash. For example, I will rather pay $15k for a Rolex 10 years later when I have a spare $100k in my bank account, than pay $10k for the same Rolex right now when I only have $20k in my bank account. Sure, the Rolex might cost $5k more in the future, but with the additional money now, I can generate much more money than that for the future.
And maybe it's due to the way I was brought up, but I find more satisfaction in buying things with more values/functions/uses than simply something with brand name. Good example is a OT500 vs a Tudor Black Bay or a Rolex Sub.
I would like to healthy contest your last statement of simply something with brand name![]()
Have u hold a Rolex Sub to compare with OT500?
If so, in which area that the sub is not of values/function/uses (example)
No flame or challenge. I just want to understand more![]()
Completely understand what you're referring to as opportunity cost. Well if one doesn't sacrifice his lifestyle (clothes, meals, holidays, entertainment etc), or maybe just cutting back on those by 20% to fund his purchase, then I'll say go for it.
In addition to opportunity cost, I also think in terms of spare cash. For example, I will rather pay $15k for a Rolex 10 years later when I have a spare $100k in my bank account, than pay $10k for the same Rolex right now when I only have $20k in my bank account. Sure, the Rolex might cost $5k more in the future, but with the additional money now, I can generate much more money than that for the future.
And maybe it's due to the way I was brought up, but I find more satisfaction in buying things with more values/functions/uses than simply something with brand name. Good example is a OT500 vs a Tudor Black Bay or a Rolex Sub.
As the saying goes, money is the root of all evil.