peaceheart
Banned
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2006
- Messages
- 106,436
- Reaction score
- 27,637
Nah, not going to spend more than $100. Past that phaseTop up a bit get xm4

Nah, not going to spend more than $100. Past that phaseTop up a bit get xm4
Lol you will realise 300+ is nothing much for more quality.Nah, not going to spend more than $100. Past that phase
Box is dua ling gong only.I use
KZ ZAX IEM ~ $75
KZ AZ09 Pro adapter + box ~ $50
No horse run. Can go wired or wireless. Got apt-X Adaptive. Box a little big.

Been thru that phase already. Used to spend up til $500 for audio stuff but nah no longer that obsessed nowLol you will realise 300+ is nothing much for more quality.
But if you have experienced $500 quality, surely you cannot settle with <$100 quality now?Been thru that phase already. Used to spend up til $500 for audio stuff but nah no longer that obsessed now
Diminishing returns and money can put elsewhere...
Nowadays $100 or even sub $100 stuff are very well made compared to 10 years ago. Even stock earphones that came with mobile phones are so much better though many brands dun even come with earphones now haha. I find that the tuning is more impt than the paper specs.But if you have experienced $500 quality, surely you cannot settle with <$100 quality now?
Or are you claiming there's no difference? I am using quality loosely, including sound quality and feature set.
Yup, just to name 1 example and this is an old model.Yup, nowadays sub $100 tws are very good already.
Dun forget about ANC. Just a personal observation, dun understand why the need for ANC in tws and this feature will cause the price of the tws to skyrocket hahha.Yup nowadays pay more is usually for the branding and availability of app. And maybe things like LDAC and "first to haves".
I get what you mean but for me the difference between a $100 and $300 TWS is the sum of it's features and it greatly affects my day to day usage and enjoyment of my music and ease of use.Nowadays $100 or even sub $100 stuff are very well made compared to 10 years ago. Even stock earphones that came with mobile phones are so much better though many brands dun even come with earphones now haha. I find that the tuning is more impt than the paper specs.
There's definitely a difference but I can live with it. Maybe due to aging, my senses not as good as before too hahha. $500 is just not worth it especially for a tws. I do have a $250 wired sennheiser headphones that I'm still using for >10 years though.
Edit: to add on, I dun mind a lousier and cheaper tws cos tws is meant for commute and outdoors. I dun expect theater like sound, I do want to be aware of my surrounding. Also, tws battery will probably last ard 2 years? Why spend so much for a product for 2 years usage?
Hello, I will like to check if marshall TWS is a good buy if I listen to rock music (guns n roses, Aerosmith etc)?
imo it depends on the manufacturer's design...Just curious, do you have a preference for stem or no stem tws?
I prefer no stem