Hi, are there any non-cloud based IP camera? Not sure if "non-cloud" is the correct term, but I'm looking for a IP Cam which can connect directly to static IP to view rather than connecting to cloud server. TIA.
Thks for the info.many ip cams does that.
all recordings are stored on the SD Card itself. you can view the recordings to going to the IPcam's camara IP
Just to name a few
Foscam
Sineoji
DLink
be sure to check on the box before you buy
Thks for the info.
Just to clarify, does it mean that when I use the mobile phone to view the live video, it is connecting directly to the camera and not connecting to cloud server?
I have 2 old model Vstarcam IP Cam. Last week out of sudden, these 2 seems like got problem. The camera keep on rotating and then will stop a default location.
Even i call the preset, few minutes later, it will rotate again and go back to default location.
Emailed the distributor but telling is EOL, so no support.
Any advice?
Thanks.
I have 2 old model Vstarcam IP Cam. Last week out of sudden, these 2 seems like got problem. The camera keep on rotating and then will stop a default location.
Even i call the preset, few minutes later, it will rotate again and go back to default location.
Emailed the distributor but telling is EOL, so no support.
Any advice?
Thanks.
very competitive. Else, we have the upcoming 1080P PT619V from Sineoji too (OEM of HW0048 by wanscam with 1080P)
wow? where you get this info from ?
Read the post from the previous guy who created a big response from the marketing crowd. Think of it, if wanscam launched a product way before Sineoji (in form of 720P), do you think Sineoji would have owned the shell design initially? However, I am super duper curious how he got a 1080P set when the last I managed to get is only a 960P unit in china when I visit there (true 1280x960P onvif streaming)...
Do a comparison of all of wanscam product and Sineoji's product, in terms of shell, you will be able to tell where the source is from, check out also the mobile APP interface against wanscam and Sineoji. No offence, even for MARIX's products, they are from China too. The only products maybe I would place my bet on own R&D is Samsung & D-Link, but not everything.
I traced the Zafego also, though it is a collaboration with the Swedish, it is also an OEM from China too. Its just local branding done for China made products via the west. It proves that China products are gaining acceptance from the world due to pricing.
Unless the companies can prove that they own the design patents with certs, otherwise, high chances is, its an OEM from somewhere.
we have the upcoming 1080P PT619V from Sineoji too (OEM of HW0048 by wanscam with 1080P)
Reading this remark, you using Sineoji's brand name to market your hw0048 OEM ? Legally speaking I don't think is right.
If you are selling Sineoji's cams, perfectly fine. But if you are not selling Sineoji's cams and portraiting your OEM hw0048 as sineoji's cams, it is unethical as some consumers might assume is sineoji where is not, so as to speak.
Most of us chose sineoji is because of their excellence where it comes to support and their cameras are as good. One ring, they go to the extent to even do repeated house visits for support where they don't charge at all. Dedicated and passionate that's what I described. Others will charge $80 per visit, subsequent another visit $80, cash cow.
Thumbs down to you.


no hard offence, the previous guy sounded dubious. Believing in him is like... to think that only you among the rest believed him.
Strange enough, the guy and you were both singing the same tune.
then again to be honest, OEM or not if the service is there, is there. People will know which is good for them and which isn't.
Reading this remark, you using Sineoji's brand name to market your hw0048 OEM ? Legally speaking I don't think is right.
If you are selling Sineoji's cams, perfectly fine. But if you are not selling Sineoji's cams and portraiting your OEM hw0048 as sineoji's cams, it is unethical as some consumers might assume is sineoji where is not, so as to speak.
Most of us chose sineoji is because of their excellence where it comes to support and their cameras are as good. One ring, they go to the extent to even do repeated house visits for support where they don't charge at all. Dedicated and passionate that's what I described. Others will charge $80 per visit, subsequent another visit $80, cash cow.
Thumbs down to you.
what you expect from someone who says the grape is sour when they can't have them?![]()
You mean among the aggressive marketing accounts? Maybe you can also do some online research on the IP camera market and you will know the truth, google the information on both brands, look at the model and you can know, compare the APPs. Have you done comparison? Make sense? Or still in "denial like the others"?
But, the guy who posted the review, I seriously doubt he have a 1080P unit unless he proves it, as far as I know of, it is max 960P that they (wanscam) have in their product range for consumer pan/tilt.
In terms of services, currently both companies (Sineoji & Marix) have very good reputation in the market, this fact I shall not dispute for sure.
Denial like the others?
Is your credibility and the ability to distort your motion drives everyone to have that conclusion.
Marix, marix, marix. Your hidden agenda is already pretty obvious don't you think?
Is it me or others are also sharing the same thought that that person is actually you in disguise? Because so far it seems like you are the only 1 trying to whack Sineoji for Marix. No one else does that except those newly created accounts / low post count accounts
No offense but you can continue to indulge in your little puny comparisons where the mass continue to get what they believe is the truth and good for them.
just to bring down sineoji?In terms of services, currently both companies (Sineoji & Marix) have very good reputation in the market, this fact I shall not dispute for sure.