YTD 2025 Networth tracking thread

PrincessBunny

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2024
Messages
27
Reaction score
34
Just to add on, clients of finance industry also tend to withdraw during market crashes. This will also cause the MWRR to give a much lower return due to the smaller AUM base. To mitigate this, TWRR is used as the effect of cashflows are removed from the equation.

Care to share your top 5 holdings?
No Mag 7 in the top 5.
WRB, FIX, COKE, BAC, IBKR
 

stanlawj

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2021
Messages
7,773
Reaction score
4,187
MWR is what we investors truely make from our money in the market.
TWR is just a way to sell the notion that it "removes cash inflows and outflows".

Sub-periods of negative returns will make TWR larger than MWR.
Hence, with a longer track record for professional portfolio managers, the gap between TWR and MWR actually widens over time as most are unable to beat the market index.

On the other hand, large positive returns will narrow the gap, especially so when you buy more during crashes. In such cases, MWR will outpace TWR.

The best investors tend to have a higher MWR than TWR as they buy the dips, so good job for you.

Ok, now I understand why TWRR is preferred by fund managers.

Because their clients will panic withdraw/redeem funds during dips, and then at the slightest sign of some rally, they start to sell (and after long rallies, only then start to buy more). These cash in/out is not stored in with the fund manager so will significantly hurt the fund manager's MWRR.

Whereas investors managing own funds will buy the dips/crash and then sell only after long rallies. And for myself, all the cash to buy or sell still stay in my broker account, not cashed out immediately!
I use IBKR as pseudo savings account since they pay higher interest on cash than SG banks.

So basically, MWRR for retail investors managing own portfolio. TWRR not needed. If TWRR is smaller than MWRR, it isn't a problem for retail investors, as long as TWRR is still higher than chosen benchmark.
Yeah, Adam Khoo should report MWRR since he is managing own money and not a fund manager subject to untimely client redemptions.
 
Last edited:

laokorkor

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2022
Messages
574
Reaction score
400
Ok, now I understand why TWRR is preferred by fund managers.
Yes, time weighted return is preferred by asset managers.

Example, fund company rolls out 5 funds. Over 5 years, 4 funds get mediocre returns and 1 fund shoots through the roof. Fund company markets the superstar fund like crazy. This particular fund gets huge inflow and because of asset bloat, it subsequently gets poor return.

Using time weighted return, the fund still gets a good performance facade, thanks to its previous 5 years of good returns.
 

Jirachi

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
54,182
Reaction score
2,789
I don't really understand the TWR and MWR. I just take the lower TWR anyways.

2025:
TWR 46% YTD
MWR 67% YTD

2024:
TWR 84%
MWR 88%

Consistently beating ETFs and fund managers in 2 years.
 

PrincessBunny

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2024
Messages
27
Reaction score
34
I don't really understand the TWR and MWR. I just take the lower TWR anyways.

2025:
TWR 46% YTD
MWR 67% YTD

2024:
TWR 84%
MWR 88%

Consistently beating ETFs and fund managers in 2 years.
Your MWR is higher because you did a good investment decision of buying during the dip, as mentioned by princessbunny me in #4044 below.
The best investors tend to have a higher MWR than TWR as they buy the dips, so good job for you.
 

d5dude

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Messages
13,013
Reaction score
4,842
I dun think TWR or MWR accurately capture net returns, at least they dun appear to be correct on IBKR.

My returns (MWR) are supposedly negative since inception, while TWR is up 36000%, none of these numbers are even remotely close to my actual returns (which I manually tabulate once a year). I think even very short term cash injections/withdrawals to the account greatly distort these numbers, especially if they are large.


free picture upload site

 

stanlawj

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2021
Messages
7,773
Reaction score
4,187
It depends on how much you started off. If you began with a small account and continuously inject funds (savings, bonus) during bear markets, definitely over 5 to 10 years it will be huge returns. Especially when the total injected money is multiple times the initial savings amount.

I think only the YTD is relevant here, like I would like to know how you managed to get a superb 76% return YTD!
 

d5dude

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Messages
13,013
Reaction score
4,842
It depends on how much you started off. If you began with a small account and continuously inject funds (savings, bonus) during bear markets, definitely over 5 to 10 years it will be huge returns. Especially when the total injected money is multiple times the initial savings amount.

But according to IBKR my MWR since inception is -591%, that doesnt look like huge returns to me. These numbers are obviously wrong, this is why I only look at simple return i.e final value - cost.

I think only the YTD is relevant here, like I would like to know how you managed to get a superb 76% return YTD!

Believers in the AI revolution got paid, btw even the YTD numbers are not exactly accurate...
 

limster

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2000
Messages
12,494
Reaction score
3,546
Jizjd24.gif


3/4 of the year already over.

Despite being in the Red for NVO, my portfolio continues to grow. The last 3 years have been really good to investors.
 

revhappy

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2012
Messages
12,194
Reaction score
2,635
Jizjd24.gif


3/4 of the year already over.

Despite being in the Red for NVO, my portfolio continues to grow. The last 3 years have been really good to investors.
Congratulations! International Non US equities are also up big time, I remember your allocation is high in UK, EU and Australia value stocks right? All these have done really well.

Actually it is the US mid and small cap that is the only thing that is cheap right now. The flow in US goes mostly to the 7 megacaps, hence the PE ratio of mid and small caps is still quite low.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top