Phen8210
High Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2011
- Messages
- 29,037
- Reaction score
- 8,289
i dont think a 15% deficit in raster performance and 50% in vram capacity allows the 4060 to qualify as """more robust in all aspects""". even in raytracing, the b580 is closer to the 4060 than the rx7600 and in certain titles like cp2077 (!) the b580 comes out on top. all that while saving 15% the cost mind u, thats like what local sales look like nowdays (best case) but this is a permanent price undercut.
Of course, the words robustness and performance were never associated together to begin with.
Robustness emphasizes reliability and resilience when tested in a wide variety of conditions. When it comes to reliable drivers, NVIDIA has a long track record for when comes to stability, support and compatibility. AMD is pretty decent nowadays, but Intel current is still in a developmental phase with a lot of room for growth.
A580 should be cheaper to begin with because its lagging in other crucial aspects besides their value/performance proposition.
I think not looking beyond just the performance value offering is why a lot people don't understand why ARC has just 0.2% of the market after 2 years, how AMD is gaining traction, and why Nvidia is the market leader.
Don't forget that AMD also had a record for crappy drivers which was one of the reasons people would stray away, and how that has changed which is shaping them today.
In other words, to attract people to purchase your product it has to appeal in more ways than just one or two aspects. Also, it takes a long time to gain trust.. reputation is very important.. i dont really want to go about that because its intel we speaking of here.
Last edited: