jq1986
Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2006
- Messages
- 7,733
- Reaction score
- 665
Exactly...every now and then you will see a thread complaining about hawker drive mercedes live landed. Then everyone says hawkers earn too much.I'm curious on the commotions.
IMHO, it is a simple Offer and Acceptance issue.
It was spelt out clearly in the contract that the provision of free/subsidised meals is required on top of the rent the hawkers are paying.
The hawker can then choose to accept or decline the contract.
If the hawkers sign up with knowledge of the contract requirements, why the hooha now?
Nobody put a knife to their neck to accept mah.
Take it or leave it.
But now accept already then KPKB chu pattern?
Same as some mall requires stores to open 365 days with full mall open hours, even during CNY or X'Mas holidays or no footfall / traffic days.
It's all spelt out in the contract upon signing if the tenant wants a store in the venue.
Tenants can take it or leave it.
It is as good as complaining against a land lord who charges $100k/m for rent.
Rental cost spelt out clearly in contract.
Tenant accept already then can KPKB say rental cost is too high?
Why is "who is responsible for feeding the needy" even a point of discussion?
Then now say hawkers earn too little. Jesus, these are adults making adult decisions. Which business don't have risk? You think they went in trying to make as little money as possible? ROFL. They'll chop you in an instant.