Haha, chill bro.
Not trying to make a case (pun intended) for consumers or retailers or distros, but for things like casings, very hard to justify warranty. Coz how to tell distro that it's manufacturer's fault, not users' fault?
"Casing was damaged already during shipping, I discovered it when I opened it at home."
"Then why didnt you highlight to retailer earlier? Did you manage to physically witness the manufacturer damage the product while packing into the box? Any proof that it is not your fault, not your carelessness during transporting the casing home that caused the damage?"
I can imagine such a conversation going on during RMA.
Cant really blame distro lah. Reason why I say on compassionate grounds is coz distro really has no reason to give 1-1 exchange. No proof whatsoever that casing got damaged during packing or shipping. Even if wanna claim Lemon Law also need to have proof on the part of the consumer that it is the seller's fault that the product is damaged. Now no proof to blame any party, no need to talk about Lemon Law, even if u to court against retailer or manufacturer or distro, high chance will lose coz no evidence. Even if u submit to CASE, after they investigate for like 1 month to 6 months, they may end up telling u no point also since no evidence. Purchasing from retailer cannot be used as evidence since it was by mutual consent that the seller (retailer) agreed to transfer ownership of the product to the buyer (consumer) over a certain price. So no fight over there.
Hence if TS can get Convergent to do 1-1 exchange, best, case (pun intended again) closed. Else there's nothing much he can do about the current plight of the case.