[CONSOLIDATED] Errant Cyclists Thread

[Prince_Of_Darkness_Dracul]

Lololol I don't see the problem here.

you didn't see a whole bunch of cyclists beating red light? they are hantu?

 

[kgluong]

you didn't see a whole bunch of cyclists beating red light? they are hantu?

Yes and what wrong with that? They are cyclists not in a motor vehicle.

 

[uni_user]

Lololol I don't see the problem here.

the problem will be when accident happens bcause they chiong red light and driver tio sabo with fine and trauma.

pls tell LTA midnight expressway empty, remove speed limit lor...

law and order is to protect everyone.... but currently is just the cyclists getting exemptions.

 

[Prince_Of_Darkness_Dracul]

Yes and what wrong with that? They are cyclists not in a motor vehicle.

please help share which law, rules or clause exempts cyclists from road traffic rules and they can beat red lights!
screwing the traffic red lights and beating them now!

 

[Darkshadows]

Yes and what wrong with that? They are cyclists not in a motor vehicle.

They can cause accidents because of their doings. It's wrong.

 

[AuraKUPO]

One look can tell not many here cycle. The location in that video is seletar airport, every driver knows that is the cyclists training ground. It's normal to beat red light at small road when there are no cars around. It's not a busy road, not highway, not express way. The driver and his wife in that video are first time go that place is it?

 

[clearwhitesky]

Brain tumor again?

 

[Prince_Of_Darkness_Dracul]

training ground, big deal or what

I didn't know can ownself decide and declare training ground on SG roads and is normal to beat red lights

orchard road at night is not busy road not highway and expressway, declaring it official SG race track training ground and beating red lights there now!

 

[Cmonster]

what mind blowing logic did I just read

this guy is a pest that twists the rules to his own fancy

 

[Mystyque]

One look can tell not many here cycle. The location in that video is seletar airport, every driver knows that is the cyclists training ground. It's normal to beat red light at small road when there are no cars around. It's not a busy road, not highway, not express way. The driver and his wife in that video are first time go that place is it?

So it's OK to beat red lights and ignore traffic rules because no cars around and it's not a busy road?
Maybe need to poh mata on AuraKupo

 

[GentingMan]

what mind blowing logic did I just read

This type is use his own ** and slap his own face then say it's just a mosquito bite. This type of gu niang only deem what is right to his own self but if kena from others, he will cry father n cry mother one.

 

[Prince_Of_Darkness_Dracul]

this guy is a pest that twists the rules to his own fancy

I wonder if spreading such misinfo and seeming inciting others to break the traffic rules and laws is something that is allowed
1 minute they claim they deserve same rights as other road users, next they claim rules don't apply, I wonder why so special

 

[AuraKUPO]

So it's OK to beat red lights and ignore traffic rules because no cars around and it's not a busy road?
Maybe need to poh mata on AuraKupo

You can go to seletar airport and see for yourself

 

[begintoend]

You can go to seletar airport and see for yourself

if you have no proper argument, stay out la
u get a TP to validate your statement?

 

[leongws]

You can go to seletar airport and see for yourself

So what if the cyclist beat red lights there? Does it means majority do it = correct?? Have shown u the rules whereby cyclist on road need to obey to traffic signal and u still insist no need to.

Instead of educating the cycling communities about what is wrong, u are actually encouraging more of them to do the wrong thing and treat it as correct by preaching what u assume is correct.

Like a person leave his phone on the table and go order food. Come back phone missing and he saw another person holding on to it. He confront the person and the person told him he found it so he not at fault even when the owner of the phone able to prove the phone is his. CCTV also capture the person taking the phone from the table and the thief still insisting he not at fault.

Based on your logic, the thief did nothing wrong as no one was hurt and no one was around when he saw the phone on the table. Police cannot do anything to him.

Or better still, as u r cyclist, u park your bicycle outside a washroom while u go pee. Someone saw the bike and look around. Saw nobody was around and it is safe for him, he proceed to take the bike and rode it away. U came out from washroom and saw the person riding your bike away. U shouted at him to stop and asked him why he took your bike. He replied the bike was there for the taking as no one was around it when he found it and it was safe to take it as no one was hurt. Does this sound logical??

 

[Mystyque]

You can go to seletar airport and see for yourself

I know they do that, but that doesn't make it legal or right. Just like many drivers don't slow down at zebra crossing at these quiet spots doesn't make it legal or right even if "normal"

 

[AuraKUPO]

if you have no proper argument, stay out la
u get a TP to validate your statement?

I am just telling you based on my road cycling experience. Don't need stats, rules, or laws to tell you whether - Are there cyclist training at seletar airport roads?

 

[begintoend]

I am just telling you based on my road cycling experience. Don't need stats, rules, or laws to tell you whether - Are there cyclist training at seletar airport roads?

the argument is chiong red lights.
validate that.... can you?

base on experience.... or intellect? pfffttt

 

[AuraKUPO]

So what if the cyclist beat red lights there? Does it means majority do it = correct?? Have shown u the rules whereby cyclist on road need to obey to traffic signal and u still insist no need to.

Instead of educating the cycling communities about what is wrong, u are actually encouraging more of them to do the wrong thing and treat it as correct by preaching what u assume is correct.

Like a person leave his phone on the table and go order food. Come back phone missing and he saw another person holding on to it. He confront the person and the person told him he found it so he not at fault even when the owner of the phone able to prove the phone is his. CCTV also capture the person taking the phone from the table and the thief still insisting he not at fault.

Based on your logic, the thief did nothing wrong as no one was hurt and no one was around when he saw the phone on the table. Police cannot do anything to him.

I never say it's correct to beat red light. But some people got situation judgement, I can't say they are wrong but they are not right to beat red light. I sometimes will dash or move off early to protect myself - defensive riding. It's very different when you are driving vs cycling. You need to try it to know. I ride motorbike and cycle too, so I know.

 

[Prince_Of_Darkness_Dracul]

road cycling experience trumps everything else hokays?!
screw the traffic rules, screw the law, screw the red lights, screw other road users, cyclist words are gold, screw the TP, you all better diam diam hokays!!