CPF Accounts Value Thread 2020

dork32

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
9,366
Reaction score
1,578
Accelerating repayment on a low cost mortgage decreases liquidity too, and that's the point. It seems like a paradox, but it's really not: if you dive into buying out your home's equity too quickly, then you run a bigger risk of losing your home. Yes, this seems difficult for many people to grasp, but it's really true.

.

by paying down my home loan, i run a risk of losing my home

by putting money into sa, i dont run the same risk?
 

dork32

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
9,366
Reaction score
1,578
to the people out there.

i am not asking you do pay down your home loan. i myself do not do so.
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,467
Reaction score
5,527
by paying down my home loan, i run a risk of losing my home

by putting money into sa, i dont run the same risk?
As I wrote, in both cases you reduce liquidity. You should maintain adequate liquidity, and you should be well rewarded whenever you voluntarily reduce liquidity. (If possible.)
 

dork32

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
9,366
Reaction score
1,578
As I wrote, in both cases you reduce liquidity. You should maintain adequate liquidity, and you should be well rewarded whenever you voluntarily reduce liquidity. (If possible.)

this is wat i meant bbc is very very one sided in his argument.

yes by paying down the loan, your installment reduces by 35 per month

by topping up the sa, you get $280 per month or $22 per month of interest, which you cannot touch till you are very old.

the problem here is not with the 22 or 35. it is with the 7000. it is quite a small sum. it does not make much difference on either side.
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,467
Reaction score
5,527
this is wat i meant bbc is very very one sided in his argument.

yes by paying down the loan, your installment reduces by 35 per month

by topping up the sa, you get $280 per month or $22 per month of interest, which you cannot touch till you are very old.
And you also get $490 in near immediate tax savings if it's a $7,000 top up while you're in the 7% tax bracket. And, since your future age 55+ self is that much wealthier faster, you can safely, prudently, slightly reduce your monthly retirement savings flow in compensation.

AND you're effectively forced to add housing liquidity (OA compulsory savings) as long as you work for an employer in Singapore. You cannot tap OA dollars for general liquidity until age 55+. Every month this housing-specific liquidity increases, already.

If you're going to take the liquidity reduction -- and either way you will -- you should make every dollar work as hard for you as possible. Manage well, and good luck.
 

dork32

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
9,366
Reaction score
1,578
And you also get $490 in near immediate tax savings if it's a $7,000 top up while you're in the 7% tax bracket. And, since your future age 55+ self is that much wealthier faster, you can safely, prudently, slightly reduce your monthly retirement savings flow in compensation.

AND you're effectively forced to add housing liquidity (OA compulsory savings) as long as you work for an employer in Singapore. You cannot tap OA dollars for general liquidity until age 55+. Every month this housing-specific liquidity increases, already.

If you're going to take the liquidity reduction -- and either way you will -- you should make every dollar work as hard for you as possible. Manage well, and good luck.

490 is a one time deduction. $35 is every month for the next 20 years
 

gold_eagle36

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2004
Messages
1,682
Reaction score
118
Let's define liquidity as physical cash flow.

If the argument is about liquidity and housing loan, the key should be whether cash is being used to finance the loan or its just cpf OA.

For loan fully paid by monthly cpf Oa:
The $35 per month saved is merely a reduction of OA payment for the home loan.
The $490 is however a one time cash "rebate".

Nevertheless, both usage of $7000 is an immediate loss of short term liquidity.
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2009
Messages
110,185
Reaction score
23,027
0HqUQoBl.jpg

VWb6INEl.jpg

Just won $17k gambling before CNY. Pumped all into CPF.

Sent from Samsung SM-N960F using GAGT
 

elf108

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2002
Messages
14,593
Reaction score
1,456
What happens if contribution exceeded the
Annual limit ?

Q
What is the CPF Annual Limit?
A
The CPF Annual Limit is the maximum amount of mandatory and voluntary contributions* to all three CPF Accounts that a CPF member can receive in a calendar year. The current CPF Annual limit is $37,740.

https://ibb.co/rcy6cBq

Separately I also top up $7k to SA. Will they refund me the excess ? Interest earned how ? Confused.
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,467
Reaction score
5,527
Cash top ups into Special and Retirement Accounts are not subject to the CPF Annual Limit.
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,467
Reaction score
5,527
why pump into sa, rather go oa can buy property at least
One reason is that it's not possible. You cannot deposit cash into an Ordinary Account only, not unless you're repaying funds (plus accrued interest) that already came out of OA.

....Need I go on?

sa maybe wont even live till that old
According to Singapore's official 2017 life tables, the probability a male celebrating his 30th birthday today will see his 55th birthday is over 96%. And the bigger and more secure that male's future retirement income is, the more that male can safely spend and enjoy life before then.
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2009
Messages
110,185
Reaction score
23,027
why pump into sa, rather go oa can buy property at least
sa maybe wont even live till that old
I am staying with my parents right now, why would I need a property when I don't even know if I am getting married?

Many people get trapped because they believe in the lie that everyone need to own a house to have a good life.

Maybe true in the past when home prices are reasonable, but definitely not today when everything is over-inflated.

Of course, if circumstances changes, I am willing to change my mindset to better face reality.

Sent from Samsung SM-N960F using GAGT
 

Okenba

Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
5,324
Reaction score
996
I am staying with my parents right now, why would I need a property when I don't even know if I am getting married?

Many people get trapped because they believe in the lie that everyone need to own a house to have a good life.

Maybe true in the past when home prices are reasonable, but definitely not today when everything is over-inflated.

Of course, if circumstances changes, I am willing to change my mindset to better face reality.

Sent from Samsung SM-N960F using GAGT

Rental? If you qualify for the hdb singles scheme, I think it is worth finding out more.

Property allows for leverage and margin that isn't as easily obtained when you invest in the market. And BTOs are quite subsidised I think.
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,467
Reaction score
5,527
I am staying with my parents right now, why would I need a property when I don't even know if I am getting married?

Many people get trapped because they believe in the lie that everyone need to own a house to have a good life.
You don't really own it anyway. You just borrow it for 99 years. ;)

Cash also works, we should point out. There are many lucky people who enjoy a great line of credit with the Bank of Mom & Dad, and they just don't need OA as OA. So they might as well shove every OA dollar into SA as early as they can, and use cash (and OA after they hit the FRS) whenever they wish for their housing.

The "rules" are different for reasonably wealthy families.
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2009
Messages
110,185
Reaction score
23,027
Rental? If you qualify for the hdb singles scheme, I think it is worth finding out more.

Property allows for leverage and margin that isn't as easily obtained when you invest in the market. And BTOs are quite subsidised I think.
I have a conservative risk appetite. I don't think property speculation is for me.

As for a home to stay, my current plan is to stay with my parents till they pass on, then stay till the HDB lease is over and then buy a 2-room flat.

Of course, this plan is subject to changes in the future.

Sent from Samsung SM-N960F using GAGT
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2009
Messages
110,185
Reaction score
23,027
You don't really own it anyway. You just borrow it for 99 years. ;)

Cash also works, we should point out. There are many lucky people who enjoy a great line of credit with the Bank of Mom & Dad, and they just don't need OA as OA. So they might as well shove every OA dollar into SA as early as they can, and use cash (and OA after they hit the FRS) whenever they wish for their housing.

The "rules" are different for reasonably wealthy families.
My thought process is this:

"Do I need to own a home to have a good quality of life?"

No.

"Do I need to have a steady source of income in my older years to have a good quality of life?"

Yes.

With this, its pretty easy to decide where to put my money in.

Sent from Samsung SM-N960F using GAGT
 

decibel.

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
6,068
Reaction score
560
Rental? If you qualify for the hdb singles scheme, I think it is worth finding out more.

Property allows for leverage and margin that isn't as easily obtained when you invest in the market. And BTOs are quite subsidised I think.
There are people who exceed the cap for BTO and can't buy HDB but only private condo. In this case, better to put in SA.

Sent from HUAWEI VOG-L29 using GAGT
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top