Pap character assault during GE25
1. Workers' Party (WP) and the Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC) Saga:
The PAP has repeatedly brought up the issue of financial mismanagement in WP-run town councils, particularly AHPETC, where they accused the WP of poor financial oversight. The WP had to defend itself against allegations of improper payments and governance failures. This issue was often raised in public debates and parliamentary sessions, with PAP ministers asserting that the WP lacked the experience and ability to govern at a national level.
WP MPs, like Pritam Singh and Sylvia Lim, were targeted by PAP leaders for their roles in the saga. The attacks aimed to discredit the WP as being incapable of managing public funds and undermined their credibility as the leading opposition party.
2. Progress Singapore Party (PSP) and its Founding Members:
The PAP has criticized PSP, especially its founder, Dr. Tan Cheng Bock, who was a former PAP MP before breaking away to form PSP. The PAP has often used his past affiliation with the ruling party against him, questioning his motives for founding a new opposition party and suggesting that he was only interested in regaining power.
PSP members, including former PAP members who joined the party, were also frequently portrayed as opportunistic or disloyal, with PAP leaders questioning their commitment to serving the people rather than seeking personal political gain.
3. Character Assassination of Opposition Leaders:
During debates, PAP leaders have been accused of using personal attacks on opposition leaders to distract from policy discussions. For example, during parliamentary debates, PAP ministers have often brought up past incidents or comments made by opposition MPs and used them as ammunition to cast doubt on their judgment and reliability.
In some cases, PAP ministers have questioned the loyalty of opposition leaders to Singapore, casting them as unpatriotic or out of touch with the needs of the people.
4. The Issue of National Security and Opposition's Role:
PAP has sometimes framed opposition parties as being less committed to national security. In particular, they’ve accused the WP and PSP of being too critical of the government’s handling of security matters or of being weak on defense. This often plays on fears around stability and the country’s safety, questioning whether opposition parties could be trusted in such a crucial area.
These attacks often form part of the PAP’s broader strategy of positioning themselves as the party of experience and competence, while trying to weaken the opposition’s standing in the eyes of voters.