Chill bro... read my posts carefully...... you are creating a strawman out of the whole discussion.
My initial proposition was never that the slayer is a super duper better machine compared to e61 types. The aim of that post with the video is to share beautiful tiger striping and to show active preinfusion at work on a slayer machine. However now that you seem to be diverting the topic, I could confidently say that the slayer is "better" for intrashot thermal stability and quite possibly intershot consistency especially for busier cafes compared to a E61 because of the saturated group head (Plus a host of other technicalities which I would not want to go into)
Yes...20 grams of grounds could get you 2 drinks....but they are espressos.... not the ristretto you saw in the video. If the slayer marketing team wanted to show that the slayer is capable of making espressos I'm sure they can. But obviously they do not want to do that because making a ristretto would more easily showcase a more pronounced tiger striping and mottling which for a greater visual effect for a promotional video....
WRT your qn on whether its the 20grms of espresso or the slayer machine doing the job of a good extraction, I would say that qn is irrelevant...."Good extraction" (Wat I think you mean is
even extraction across the puck, your term good extraction is too general) can be achieved with most decent machines and dosage of 7-22grms. You need even distribution and correct particle range. I would even dare to venture and say that a good quality filter basket and some kind of preinfusion (vs immediate exposure to 9bar) is beneficial.
So.....is it the 20grms or the slayer machine thats makes the extraction in the video looks so even? Irrelevant.
The more important qn is...how does it taste which you somewhat alluded in your subsequent qns. Honestly I don't know cos I have never tested a slayer. What interested me in the slayer and some synessos is the controllable preinfusion you see. It is an interesting variable to play with to try and coax the most desirable elements from the puck into the cup and I think will be a essential tool to a skilled barista in the future. Giving the barista the added capability to vary the pressure is like giving an artist or engineer a tool to create something better greater which he possibly could not previously because of the technical limitations in his instruments. You can also control pressure with a lever machine but I personally do not like it because it is not precise and will add too many uncontrolled variables when trying to experiment with new blends and trying to get the best elements out of the bean.
20grams of coffee will flow...you just need to adjust your grind and use the correct sized filter baskets for this. I recommend VST because they have done their homework to calibrate their baskets to match a grind size that will produce a drink that will have an acceptable extraction yield and total dissolved solids to make a good espresso. VST is the same company sells refractometers and software to measure extraction yield and total dissolved solids in coffee.
Those who have followed this thread will know that I
generally favour a 18g dose into a 25-30ml ristretto at between 25-30s. Why? Simply because I prefer the taste. As I have mentioned many times I feel 14g-15g for a 60ml drink is not optimal for the espresso blends I get here. The drink is harsh, too acidic, too bitter and too thin. Too many undesirable elements were extracted out at the later portions of the extraction. A 15g dosed ristretto is better than a 15g double espresso but my personal favourite is a 18g dose for a ristretto not because I love seeing the flow but because it tasted the best in the cup to my taste buds. 22g ristretto is unbalanced for me and is simply awful for a double espresso. I use 22g to make americanos when I want a longer drink. (Yes I have the 15, 18 and 22 gram vst filter baskets)
If you find that brewing using the "standard" Italian parameters of 7g, 25ml, 9bar, at 88 degrees works best for you then thats great but I would caution against falling for the romantic notion that the Italians know best about espresso since they originated it and thus you must adhere to the 14g rule. Their number may work with the blends they like to use but not for what your local roaster sells. My take is that traditional Italian blends use a small percentage of robusta and a higher percentage of brazilians roasted darker than what we usually get in the local market.
You somewhat hinted it is more economical to reduce a 20g dose and grind finer instead of using a 20g dose and grind coarser. My take on this is use what ever dose or grind you need to get the best out of the bean. You may need to even consider forgetting using the espresso method for brewing for a particular bean/blend/roasting batch. Forget about trying to save a few grams of coffee per drink just because you think its economical. Its like putting less salt in a dish just because you want to save your salt supply.