GPU for 27" 2560x1440 resolution

limster

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2000
Messages
13,085
Reaction score
4,048
i play BF3 on 27" 2560x1440 and 24" 1920x1200. I actually prefer the 24". you can read the blogs of various fps pro gamers, most of them do not like overly large screens. I'm using 7950 2560x1440 BF3 on all high settings, minimum 40fps. average 50+fps.

For RTS, bigger the screen the better, but note that 27" 16:9 is not that much bigger than 24" 16:10.
 

Vincym

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
642
Reaction score
1
Using the Dell Monitor. Single GTX 680 will not be able to max up some games, but can play at high by turning AA off.

I would say GTX 670 and above cards needed.

More importantly get more VRAM. Minimum 3gb. Mine now bottleneck by VRAM.

Hope this helps :D
 

kingsen

Senior Member
Joined
May 28, 2009
Messages
1,408
Reaction score
31
Erm not into crossfire / sli.
I was looking at GTX 780 with 3gb vram but its very expensive.. and i might need to change my PSU also :(

GTX 770 only certain brand carry the 4gb vram version.

Btw I'm not into multi-screen also. I just wanna have a nice single big screen which can satisfy my visual sensation. Lol
 

ragnarok95

Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
125,229
Reaction score
6,468
There is no graphic now that can last you 2 to 3 yrs, unless you are prepare to lower your graphic card performance each yr.
 

enenyi

Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2011
Messages
5,927
Reaction score
5
There is no graphic now that can last you 2 to 3 yrs, unless you are prepare to lower your graphic card performance each yr.
Very true. :) Later 4k resolution gaming come out everyone will chiong to upgrade graphics cards again. So stay content with what we have. :)
 

kingsen

Senior Member
Joined
May 28, 2009
Messages
1,408
Reaction score
31
Okay I shall hoot the Dell U2713HM first and see how hehe.
Got the latest offer of $710 with 5 years warranty~
 

zXioNGz

Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Messages
9,520
Reaction score
235
Okay I shall hoot the Dell U2713HM first and see how hehe.
Got the latest offer of $710 with 5 years warranty~

Haha same here, now only waiting for asus gtx 780 dc2 and ROG Maximus vi formula!

PS: I'm actually thinking now whether to return my U2713hm, and then go tri setup of either 23" or 24", just couple of hundreds more for immerse tri screen gaming.
 

zXioNGz

Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Messages
9,520
Reaction score
235
Yup I am upgrading from 24" 1920x1080 to 27" 2560x1440 for the experience.

I don't play games like crysis 3 or batman etc. So I will be temporarily using my HD7850 first and see how.

Was looking at 7 series GTX 770 or 780 to hope that it can last long, even shift it onto my next rig in 2-3 years time.

Gtx 770, might as well go for cheaper, 680 lol. GTX780 is the best card now. 2-3 years single card won't last for the long, maybe if you plan of SLI then maybe can. Or maybe Ares 2 or GTX790 will last for 2-3 years for single card double chip gpu.
 

zXioNGz

Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Messages
9,520
Reaction score
235
Erm not into crossfire / sli.
I was looking at GTX 780 with 3gb vram but its very expensive.. and i might need to change my PSU also :(

GTX 770 only certain brand carry the 4gb vram version.

Btw I'm not into multi-screen also. I just wanna have a nice single big screen which can satisfy my visual sensation. Lol

If you not doing tri setup then what's the point of getting 4gb Vram?

Single display even at 1440p or even 1600p with 2gb Vram are considered way more than enough.

Note: don't think of getting 3gb and above unless you are running crazy resolutions with tri screen setup
 
Last edited:

zXioNGz

Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Messages
9,520
Reaction score
235
Anyway this is the monitor I'm planning to get for Tri Setup if I'm returning my U2713HM, really puzzling now :(

http://www.asus.com/sg/Monitors_Projectors/VG23AH/
 

simon45op

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2007
Messages
1,344
Reaction score
0
Erm not into crossfire / sli.
I was looking at GTX 780 with 3gb vram but its very expensive.. and i might need to change my PSU also :(

GTX 770 only certain brand carry the 4gb vram version.

Btw I'm not into multi-screen also. I just wanna have a nice single big screen which can satisfy my visual sensation. Lol

cant go wrong with gtx780. can ultra to max setting @ 2560x1440 depending on game
 
Last edited:

zXioNGz

Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Messages
9,520
Reaction score
235
cant go wrong with gtx780. can ultra to max setting @ 2560x1440 depending on game

Actually GTX 670 or 680 is more than enough to max everything, and because of 1440p IPS screens, you can off AA, which is one of the most intensive gpu harvester. Just a tip :)
 

simon45op

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2007
Messages
1,344
Reaction score
0
Actually GTX 670 or 680 is more than enough to max everything, and because of 1440p IPS screens, you can off AA, which is one of the most intensive gpu harvester. Just a tip :)

AA double vram usage. well some people like to reduce graphical setting, while i dont. gtx670 is
too slow for some games.
 

zXioNGz

Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Messages
9,520
Reaction score
235
AA double vram usage. well some people like to reduce graphical setting, while i dont. gtx670 is
too slow for some games.

No my point being, because of the higher resolution,IPS panel, the pixel density is higher when compared with 1080p on 27" monitors and TN panels. Thus, there's actually not a need to enable AA, it's a way to save costs for some people. Of course, this way you can keep all other settings at the highest.

Don't look down on 670, the Ti version actually able to perform on almost 680 standard
 

ragnarok95

Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
125,229
Reaction score
6,468
Going by his games, i really doubt he need a GTX780. Of cos, GTX780 is good. Next yr GTX8XX will be even better.
 

zXioNGz

Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Messages
9,520
Reaction score
235
Going by his games, i really doubt he need a GTX780. Of cos, GTX780 is good. Next yr GTX8XX will be even better.

Yeah haha, dota 2 really don't need 780, even 660ti more than enough. But if he plays MMO like Guild Wars or NeverWinter, then need at least 680

GTX 800 series will be GK114, it's been rumored last time that GTX780 and above will use GK114 but seems not yet, so imo most probably 800series
 

simon45op

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2007
Messages
1,344
Reaction score
0
No my point being, because of the higher resolution,IPS panel, the pixel density is higher when compared with 1080p on 27" monitors and TN panels. Thus, there's actually not a need to enable AA, it's a way to save costs for some people. Of course, this way you can keep all other settings at the highest.

Don't look down on 670, the Ti version actually able to perform on almost 680 standard

i owned both gtx780 and gtx 670 2gb 1440p,tri-1440p.i was just providing my point of view that gtx780 can go higher fps even with AA on .every card also can max setting with AA just that how high fps is.can even max with my old radeon 4870 .gtx670 can play games with AA @playable but not high framerate , it could be more enjoyable @higher fps where gtx780 come into the picture.Not everyone prefer to sacrifice AA to up other
graphic setting.
Ts is also considering gtx780 and other alternative.so whats wrong with sharing my alternate view?:s22:
 
Last edited:

zXioNGz

Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Messages
9,520
Reaction score
235
i owned both gtx780 and gtx 670 2gb 1440p,tri-1440p.i was just providing my point of view that gtx780 can go higher fps even with AA on .every card also can max setting with AA just that how high fps is.can even max with my old radeon 4870 .gtx670 can play games with AA @playable but not high framerate , it could be more enjoyable @higher fps where gtx780 come into the picture.Not everyone prefer to sacrifice AA to up other
graphic setting.
Ts is also considering gtx780 and other alternative.so whats wrong with sharing my alternate view?:s22:

Erm you relax lol, I'm not judging you by any means. I'm just saying that 1440p screen don't need AA to scale the graphic to make it look good, I'm not particularly saying that you must disable it, but of course you can always offset it in order to max out other details.
Also, I'm just pointing out that people who wants a 1440p doesn't necessarily need to upgrade to 780, ts mentioned 780 is pricy for him so I'm suggesting him an alternative.

And you said 670 is slow, I'm trying to point here too that with Ti oc version it's not that slow, it can power even for Crysis 3, highest AA doesn't mean you will get the best out of everything, sometimes you just need the right type of AA, some better ones might even cause image tearing.
 
Last edited:

simon45op

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2007
Messages
1,344
Reaction score
0
Erm you relax lol, I'm not judging you by any means. I'm just saying that 1440p screen don't need AA to scale the graphic to make it look good, I'm not particularly saying that you must disable it, but of course you can always offset it in order to max out other details.
Also, I'm just pointing out that people who wants a 1440p doesn't necessarily need to upgrade to 780, ts mentioned 780 is pricy for him so I'm suggesting him an alternative.

And you said 670 is slow, I'm trying to point here too that with Ti oc version it's not that slow, it can power even for Crysis 3, highest AA doesn't mean you will get the best out of everything, sometimes you just need the right type of AA, some better ones might even cause image tearing.



"Actually GTX 670 or 680 is more than enough to max everything, and because of 1440p IPS screens, you can off AA, which is one of the most intensive gpu harvester. Just a tip "


u quote me so i thought u teaching me mah. because this tip i 10yr ago already know. :s12:
i also never say u are wrong all the while.
gtx670 and gtx670 ti-oc is different btw.
i just saying gtx780 can handle AA better than other cards
all is good now.
 
Last edited:
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top