[GPU Review] Sapphire AMD r9 Fury X on the rise!

Usopp

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2003
Messages
1,960
Reaction score
0
One thing I've observed, that performance aside, Fury X is a technological bargain compared to 980ti. AMD is earning way less than NV per card sold. Minus the usual AMD hype crap, anyone saying that they have been uninnovating (*cough bmw cough love*) are out of touch

AIO CM CLC w/ tamed Nidec GT fan & HBM vs a 3-yr old Titan ref cooler slapped onto a newer gen chip. And one needn't worry about temps multi card config, Mikiberry can attest to that :D

Yea, materials wise, Fury X is quite good. A short card with HBM and AIO cooler coupled with a Gentle Typhoon for the same price as the 980 Ti in exchange for a minor drop in performance is pretty great. Which makes me wonder how thin AMD's profit margin is for the Fury X.
 

royfrosty

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2009
Messages
27,435
Reaction score
1,299
Just like one of our member here took out and show us. The components inside is no horse run.

Aside from that, they give good stuffs like a aio, GT fan, normal size radiator BUT with a nice reservoir on the top, sleeved tubings, HBM, nice full metal case, backplate, useful loading leds that can set blue/red/purple or off, and a dual bios switch.
 

Jian19

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2004
Messages
99,686
Reaction score
25,643
if u all wan to see really dismantle of the whole card go tiong forum chiphell...got ppl hoot and dismantle the whole card lol
 

escksu

Banned
Joined
Nov 24, 2011
Messages
8,392
Reaction score
3
R1BNr0o.png

qozP8YA.png

Io8q2so.png

CPCnUYB.png


if it's really a driver issue then hopefully review sites will redo all their benchmarks... :s13:

Frankly, those results looks very good. I don't see anything wrong with it. Roy and my own 3Dmark results have prove that FuryX is on par with Titan X.

I am trying to get Metro Last Light to run some benchmarks. Will post tonight.
 

royfrosty

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2009
Messages
27,435
Reaction score
1,299
Frankly, those results looks very good. I don't see anything wrong with it. Roy and my own 3Dmark results have prove that FuryX is on par with Titan X.

I am trying to get Metro Last Light to run some benchmarks. Will post tonight.

Good job. Help post Metro. I do not owned the game. Look forward to it.
 

trento

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2007
Messages
61,821
Reaction score
1,878
Because cannot compare directly ma dual gpu vs single GPU.

Average fps is one thing and stuttering and compatibility is another thing...

Sent from microwave oven using GAGT

correct me if im wrong. trying to understand more here. Sapphire's website doesn't say it's a dual gpu?

i know it says x2 so i was expecting to see 2 295 but the images and description shows one card.

http://www.sapphiretech.com/productdetial.asp?pid=7A5B671A-8C94-459E-98C5-9E5B03DE636D&lang=eng

thanks for any info.

edit: ok. on closer inspection, i now see 2 under one shroud....
 

monikernemo

Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2014
Messages
7,268
Reaction score
1
IMHO, stuttering is not a problem. I am running a pair of Fury X and I never notice any stuttering. So I don't know why websites and pple keep talking about stuttering.

Ahh okay I see. I am just describing common issue associated with multi gpu solutions.

I used a Mars III previously.
While most games can drive well, FC4 faced some issues when I load the game; encountered some weird flickering. And at that point of time, FC 4 was already released for about half year?

Had to turn on triple buffering to offset flickering temporarily though.

Was quite dulan so sold the card LOL and got a 780Ti...

Sent from microwave oven using GAGT
 

Donten

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
2,003
Reaction score
0
the ekwb looks good. surprise this time round is cover the whole thing compared to other recent offerings. do they still have nickel plating issues? xspc looks like crap as usual.
 

monikernemo

Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2014
Messages
7,268
Reaction score
1
correct me if im wrong. trying to understand more here. Sapphire's website doesn't say it's a dual gpu?

i know it says x2 so i was expecting to see 2 295 but the images and description shows one card.

http://www.sapphiretech.com/productdetial.asp?pid=7A5B671A-8C94-459E-98C5-9E5B03DE636D&lang=eng

thanks for any info.

edit: ok. on closer inspection, i now see 2 under one shroud....

Each cores on the card is essentially a 290X..

Sent from microwave oven using GAGT
 

escksu

Banned
Joined
Nov 24, 2011
Messages
8,392
Reaction score
3
the ekwb looks good. surprise this time round is cover the whole thing compared to other recent offerings. do they still have nickel plating issues? xspc looks like crap as usual.

Agreed. The xspc one simply don't look appealing.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top