High cholesterol

mummynew

Suspended
Joined
Apr 1, 2019
Messages
3,817
Reaction score
2,776
Another example: whole grain rice is not fully absorbed due to phytic acid (phytates) that actually interferes with the body's absorption of minerals, specifically iron, zinc, magnesium, and calcium.

This brought me back to re-reading on phytates again (coz I remember ever reading about their 'anti-nutrients' property).

Phytates have their benefits and so to weigh risks vs benefits accordingly (hahaha, coz I am not willing to give up on my grains, beans, seeds, etc):





Source:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9855079/
 

stanlawj

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2021
Messages
9,288
Reaction score
5,010
This brought me back to re-reading on phytates again (coz I remember ever reading about their 'anti-nutrients' property).

Phytates have their benefits and so to weigh risks vs benefits accordingly (hahaha, coz I am not willing to give up on my grains, beans, seeds, etc):





Source:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9855079/

So that's why we eat a variety of plant food, and not just wholegrain rice every meal?
No need to eat rice every day!
 

stanlawj

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2021
Messages
9,288
Reaction score
5,010
im 41 this year
You should start eating pumpkin seeds and saw palmetto to prevent prostate enlargement.
This thing will start to accelerate in growth in your last 40 years of life.

Another thing for meat-eaters to watch out is colorectal cancer. This is due to waste products lingering too many hours in the intestines. Meat generates a lot of harmful waste products.
 
Last edited:

matchy

High Honorary Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2007
Messages
196,361
Reaction score
1,838
there no proof fish oil help to reduce cholesterol... especially ldl

But from what my observation, high cholesterol is caused by food intake and lifestyle.
So don't expect supplementary could help u.
:eek: :eek: :eek:
 

stanlawj

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2021
Messages
9,288
Reaction score
5,010
3mm per year
It's exponential growth so small early changes have big impact on final size.

Minimising the growth rate in the first 20 years will greatly affect the final size in the next 20 years.
 

Mecisteus

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
54,957
Reaction score
11,734
Interesting new study.

High vs low protein intake

Muscle vs heart

Just get your priorities correct.



For those interested to lower APOB or your cholesterol, can watch his other videos. Tons of videos base on scientific evidences on his channel.

 

stanlawj

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2021
Messages
9,288
Reaction score
5,010
Interesting new study.

High vs low protein intake

Muscle vs heart

Just get your priorities correct.



For those interested to lower APOB or your cholesterol, can watch his other videos. Tons of videos base on scientific evidences on his channel.


The studies with mice show that if you are NOT lifting weights, and you over-eat protein... you'll get metabolic diseases. (Or if you are not exercising like an athlete)

It is COMMON SENSE.

Go hit the weights, heavy as possible till 90s. Or just start moving as often as you can. Jack Lalanne is far more advanced than current medical research which is trying to find a drug to monetise laziness.

 
Last edited:

Mecisteus

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
54,957
Reaction score
11,734
The studies with mice show that if you are NOT lifting weights, and you over-eat protein... you'll get metabolic diseases. (Or if you are not exercising like an athlete)

It is COMMON SENSE.

Go hit the weights, heavy as possible till 90s. Or just start moving as often as you can. Jack Lalanne is far more advanced than current medical research which is trying to find a drug to monetise laziness.


You didn't look at the human part ?

Yes I know it's common sense to do strength training and be more active. Nobody is disputing this.

I'm just pointing out the balance of diet is crucial.
 

stanlawj

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2021
Messages
9,288
Reaction score
5,010
You didn't look at the human part ?

Yes I know it's common sense to do strength training and be more active. Nobody is disputing this.

I'm just pointing out the balance of diet is crucial.
Sorry, I'm not criticising you... it's those medical researchers that I am criticising.
So regarding the studies... I am not worried about the proportion, because our body is self-regulating. The excess will cause waist line to grow. Insufficient protein intake will cause body weight to drop and physical performance (weight lifted, reps etc) to also drop.

Anyone who continues to eat alot of protein without exercising correspondingly is courting for trouble.

The best way to regulate protein intake is to monitor physical performance. The proportion goes up and down depending on the periodic cycle of exercise. If you are athlete this will make sense.
 
Last edited:

Mecisteus

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
54,957
Reaction score
11,734
Sorry, I'm not criticising you... it's those medical researchers that I am criticising.
So regarding the studies... I am not worried about the proportion, because our body is self-regulating. The excess will cause waist line to grow. Insufficient protein intake and caloric intake will cause body weight to drop and physical performance (weight lifted, reps etc) to also drop.
Nah I still think there is a right proportion of diet to consider.

Golden rule of too much of anything is bad does applies to foods too. And don't rely on the self regulation.
 

standarture

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2009
Messages
61,520
Reaction score
18,656
You should start eating pumpkin seeds and saw palmetto to prevent prostate enlargement.
This thing will start to accelerate in growth in your last 40 years of life.

Another thing for meat-eaters to watch out is colorectal cancer. This is due to waste products lingering too many hours in the intestines. Meat generates a lot of harmful waste products.

Stop spreading these kind of misinformation la. Meat eating doesn't cause higher risk of cancer. There is no study that can prove this with any 100% certainty. And lingering too long in intestines is absolute rubbish. Machiam you saying your food is radioactive. Veggies also have damn high chance of causing colon cancer if you talk like that. A lot of chemicals don't get wash off completely and a lot is absorbed into the plant itself. A lot of people like to apply direct logic to their bodies like eat fat = become fat, eat cholesterol = high blood cholesterol. Your body is smarter than you.
 

stanlawj

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2021
Messages
9,288
Reaction score
5,010
Stop spreading these kind of misinformation la. Meat eating doesn't cause higher risk of cancer. There is no study that can prove this with any 100% certainty. And lingering too long in intestines is absolute rubbish. Machiam you saying your food is radioactive. Veggies also have damn high chance of causing colon cancer if you talk like that. A lot of chemicals don't get wash off completely and a lot is absorbed into the plant itself. A lot of people like to apply direct logic to their bodies like eat fat = become fat, eat cholesterol = high blood cholesterol. Your body is smarter than you.
It's not eating meat that causes higher risk. It is retaining the waste products too long in the colon.
Notice the difference. You can eat alot of meat... I do. Just make sure the digested residues don't stay too long inside you.

And yes, if you eat veggies, and don't pass it out for several days, it will also cause colorectal cancer.

The difference is, volume of indigestible veggie residue is much larger than the volume of meat residue for the same calories. So veggies fill up the colon faster.
 
Last edited:

Prof. Utonium

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
34,489
Reaction score
4,514
I did it for free 1 year ago. If not I heard its few K.
Yes, need to pair with statin. Statin isn't keeping my LDL down to a very low level
required for people like me with FH.
My target is 1.5 mmol/L.

How much your injection? What I know there is no subsidy and it is very expensive...
 

stanlawj

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2021
Messages
9,288
Reaction score
5,010
Nah I still think there is a right proportion of diet to consider.

Golden rule of too much of anything is bad does applies to foods too. And don't rely on the self regulation.
The total calorie, and the proportion of fat, protein and carbs fluctuate depending on your level of activity. There is a minimum amount to eat everyday for each, but once the activity goes up, the proportion varies greatly depending on the activity.

If you are not familiar how to self-regulate, the most important things to monitor are: weight, body fat, aerobic endurance, and physical leg strength.

It is like living with a mindset of an athlete.
 

Mecisteus

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
54,957
Reaction score
11,734
The total calorie, and the proportion of fat, protein and carbs fluctuate depending on your level of activity. There is a minimum amount to eat everyday for each, but once the activity goes up, the proportion varies greatly depending on the activity.

If you are not familiar how to self-regulate, the most important things to monitor are: weight, body fat, aerobic endurance, and physical leg strength.

It is like living with a mindset of an athlete.
Whatever you eat, just watch out for your health markers.

If something is out, then you need to readjust your diet or lifestyle.
 

bakuten

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2007
Messages
13,529
Reaction score
1,400
You didn't look at the human part ?

Yes I know it's common sense to do strength training and be more active. Nobody is disputing this.

I'm just pointing out the balance of diet is crucial.
the funny thing about this study is.
if you actually scrutinize their "high protein" diet.
they actually made their test subjects consume large amounts of this
https://www.nestlehealthscience.sg/brands/boost
and calling it "high protein" diet.

it's actually 70%+ carbs/seed oils and less than 25% actual protein.....and they are looking at the protein and ignoring the other 70%+ garbage
 

Mecisteus

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
54,957
Reaction score
11,734
the funny thing about this study is.
if you actually scrutinize their "high protein" diet.
they actually made their test subjects consume large amounts of this
https://www.nestlehealthscience.sg/brands/boost
and calling it "high protein" diet.

it's actually 70%+ carbs/seed oils and less than 25% actual protein.....and they are looking at the protein and ignoring the other 70%+ garbage
I didn't notice that. Will look through later.

There is also animal vs plant proteins.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084508/

Also vs fish protein to consider. The proteins quality are definitely NOT the same.
 
Last edited:
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top