Is it really over for Intel®?

Intel is ...

  • dead man walking, soon to be buried

    Votes: 57 52.3%
  • will bounce back, buyed Intc at $10 sure huat!

    Votes: 52 47.7%

  • Total voters
    109

elmariachi

Supremacy Member
Joined
May 30, 2005
Messages
6,310
Reaction score
1,474

watzup_ken

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2003
Messages
25,672
Reaction score
2,123
maybe from disappointment become hatred
I used to really dislike Intel because of known market practices and for the lack of improvements over the last decade (like we are mostly stuck on 2 or 4 cores because Intel just wants to maintain their profit margin at the expense of consumers, until AMD Ryzen came into the picture). However after sometime, I figured all the companies will behave like this when their market position allows them to. They are after all, a for profit listed company, and therefore, will try their best to maintain their profit margin and their "turf". The best thing to do, skip the product if one thinks it does not suit them, and buy it when they really need it.
 

iceblendedchoc

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Messages
21,696
Reaction score
8,924
dun worry if this happens, it would be for the better.

Apple and Samsung are reportedly in the fray to acquire Intel, according a spectacular rumor cited by Moore's Law is Dead. This would put the list of companies looking to acquire Intel at 3—Apple, Samsung, and Qualcomm. All three are Arm licensees, with unique characteristics. Apple currently has an Arm-based SoC hardware division that makes custom chips for all its devices, including Macs. Samsung would go on to be an overseas parent company for an American heritage company like Intel, but something like this is not unheard of when you consider examples such as Boston Dynamics being acquired by Hyundai Motors, or Westinghouse Nuclear's acquisition by Japan's Toshiba, before changing hands to Canadian Bookfield Partners. Then there's Qualcomm—the American company is having a bit of a falling out with Arm, and the prospect of owning the x86 IP should be tempting.

Intel retains large amounts of market-share in both the PC processor and server processor markets, however, the company's stock price has been on a downward trend for several quarters now, causing its valuation to drop to levels where any of the other big tech companies can afford to buy it out. The company spent close to $10 billion on a GPU architecture project spanning not just a contemporary graphics architecture to power the integrated graphics solutions of its PC processors, but also discrete gaming GPUs; and most importantly, an AI GPU architecture under the "Ponte Vecchio" project. Intel's Xe-HP AI GPU missed its performance targets or was too late to the market, leaving Intel with a gaping hole that it could only fill with a slew of cost-cutting measures. It doesn't help that Intel Foundry is losing its edge, and none of the logic tiles of Core Ultra "Arrow Lake" processor is made on an Intel foundry node.
 

kimsix

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2009
Messages
18,899
Reaction score
8,996
@kimsix your idol ran his mouth :ROFLMAO:

bnCLm0m.png

Pat only speaked hard truths. isnt it risky to all in taiwan?

So i think tsmc is just petty have short man syndrome + cocky because they are leading now.

That is why we must pray for Pat + Intel + USA to catch up

Intel stocks too is back bitches!

ju270Jn.png
5ac468d.png
 

Phen8210

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2011
Messages
28,854
Reaction score
8,208
Pat only speaked hard truths. isnt it risky to all in taiwan?

So i think tsmc is just petty have short man syndrome + cocky because they are leading now.

That is why we must pray for Pat + Intel + USA to catch up

Intel stocks too is back bitches!

ju270Jn.png
5ac468d.png

yeah but intel got kicked out of dow jones already, replaced by nvidia a company that pat also offended.. pat really has made too many enemies..
 

watzup_ken

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2003
Messages
25,672
Reaction score
2,123
Pat only speaked hard truths. isnt it risky to all in taiwan?

So i think tsmc is just petty have short man syndrome + cocky because they are leading now.
I think the truth is that it is very difficult to maintain a "friendly" stance, when you are actually direct competitors. So while I agree that what Pat said is factual, but if you denounce your "business partner" openly, you just increase the risk of annoying them. Which is the case here. It is akin to your fellow worker being very friendly to you on the surface, but saying all the bad things about you to your boss to earn favor for him/herself.
 
Last edited:

Phen8210

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2011
Messages
28,854
Reaction score
8,208
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top