I think
@xllms can answer your questions haha
yup, have both Qiaodan 飞影pb3.0 and xtep特步 160x5.0.
i like both and prefer pb3.0 over 160x5.0. Personally, 160x5.0 feels more of a generalist and pb3.0 feels faster and bouncier. it makes me want to run faster and land on my forefoot more. Another advantage of pb3.0 over any other running shoes is that, it is the only pair my rear soles have yet to be worn out even after 200km. All my other running shoes outer rear sole will be worn out approx. 75-125km.
Both midsoles are good, pb3.0 is thicker and respond really fast. Feels good at paces faster then 7min/km. 160x5.0 midsole is thinner and respond well. Covers slower paces better to me and can also do fast paces (altho my fastest prob around 4.30-5min/km)
pb3.0 feels good wearing as a pair of casual walking shoe for a full day, eg. travel, as xtep 160x5.0 toes area is tighter than pb3.0. due to this reason, u don't wear xtep 160x5.0 for prolonged casual walking. Having said the above, pb3.0 keeps making one want to move forward fast, thus not good for slow casual walking. xtep 150x5.0 feels more like planted down and more relaxed in this aspect.
As mentioned in my previous posts, pb3.0 felt like something between adidas adios pro 3 and takumi sen 9.
just for information, xtep is huge as a marathon running shoe in China, probably the number 1 brand in China.