dev_stg_prd
Master Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2024
- Messages
- 2,874
- Reaction score
- 1,248
don't think i bothered too much about techniques.BTW it just hit me, last time were you doing your intervals at the correct paces? To develop the correct energy system and improving your LT2 and LT2 "curves". Also assuming work:rest ratio more or less there and not totally off.
Can use this if you have been doing some TTs along, pretty reliable way.
https://runbundle.com/tools/running-training-paces-calculator
| Pace | From | To |
|---|---|---|
| Easy/long | 8:02 mins/km | 6:38 mins/km |
| Sub-threshold | 6:26 mins/km | 6:06 mins/km |
| Threshold/tempo | 5:51 mins/km | 5:45 mins/km |
| Interval/VO2 max | 5:18 mins/km | 5:05 mins/km |
| Speed endurance | 4:51 mins/km | 4:11 mins/km |
| 1000 metres race pace | 4:50 mins/km |
Thanks for sharing! Your NB size 10 2E is UK10 or US10? Which Bmai and Qiaodan model are you using?Same previously NB size 10 2E.
If D width, I would size up 1/2 size. Recent years, their last getting narrower so go 1 size up.
Now wearing Bmai and Qiaodan size 44. Width is good enough, not tight.
Xiaonian wearing 44 as well.
NB was wearing US10 2E. Or US10.5D to 11D.Thanks for sharing! Your NB size 10 2E is UK10 or US10? Which Bmai and Qiaodan model are you using?
Can ask what is your number? Coz I have a feel those mostly in the 50s range for Garmin are mostly off in Singapore. But 60+ are still fairly accurate from YouTubers test.Garmin’s VO2max number is quite legit.
i just did my VO2max test and it came within 1 pt of it!
Can ask what is your number? Coz I have a feel those mostly in the 50s range for Garmin are mostly off in Singapore. But 60+ are still fairly accurate from YouTubers test.
Edit: Just saw your other post , it's 53.
My impression on on why 50 isn't accurate is because I see a lot of local runners with about 50+ in garmin, but their 10km and 5km PB are far off from expectations when using vdot.
My impression on on why 50 isn't accurate is because I see a lot of local runners with about 50+ in garmin, but their 10km and 5km PB are far off from expectations when using vdot.
Could be, but for season runners, Re can't be too far off. Even if account for RE, a few points maybe. I have see vdot of 10 points difference. Unless I am wrong in my assumption, and RE factor can be such significantly off.Maybe RE and LT lousy lor.
My 5k and even 3k F type for the VO2max number i got, more than 5 points off.....how accurate is my Huawei, not sure.
Cardiovascular is can tahan, but not the limiter?
can i provide a data pt
vo2 max - 54 garmin
2.4k - 9:18 (2025 early mid)
5k - 22:28 (2024)
10k - 46:08 (2025 year end)
21k - 1:43:50 (2025 year end)
so am i below, at or above my vo2max
Could be, but for season runners, Re can't be too far off. Even if account for RE, a few points maybe. I have see vdot of 10 points difference. Unless I am wrong in my assumption, and RE factor can be such significantly off.
Usually I just base on 5km and 10km. HM too much endurance factor. But 2.4km would be more accurate to reduce endurance factor. But vdot chart doesn't have a 2.4km. using your 5km and 10km puts you in the 44 for vdot. Vdot assume your running economy of 1, it should be fairly accurate for season runners, with a few points off. But not cyclist or other discipline.can i provide a data pt
vo2 max - 54 garmin
2.4k - 9:18 (2025 early mid)
5k - 22:28 (2024)
10k - 46:08 (2025 year end)
21k - 1:43:50 (2025 year end)
so am i below, at or above my vo2max
I think sweet spot should be the Cooper test, for season runners without carbon plate shoesFor me, the "curve" is that 5k really off, yeah you said 10 points plus minus, then that difference gets less as we go to 3k/2.4 mark, and then even less for 800/1k/1.5 (not that i run 1-1.5k regularly, so as far as experience/skills in this goes i not there)
But then i am not a terribly seasoned runner, long, middle or short distances, i just run.......but that's my "curve" that i can share. 5k is biggest margin, then margin goes down as we approach 1k. I cannot say for things like 400m etc, those so short that really need track.
So yes, you might have a point in that observation of yours, at least for my 5k.
edit - oh yes, for 400m, the difference is just 3.5 points. Not that 400m is terribly useful in the first place, coz i only have "TT" experience 3 times only so is super noob, ie i only tried 400mm as TT 3X.But then without such experience, can get to 3.5 points, maybe that tells a story as well.
But of coz, also, for such shorter distances, anaerobic/ATP-PC system plays more of a part in %
I no run 800m before, not even once.
chiobu
First things first bro, you can always ditch the cleats and see if you can take it. Secondly, if you are in any unsafe groups, ditch that as well. Thirdly (which i think you are always doing also), just do solo lah.
High chance you can take it without cleats. Without cleats, there is a much higher chance that you'd be able to land safely even if you screwed up on the flat pedals.......it's just normal reflex.
If you dont trust me, try it first on glass and trying starting off with the wrong foot or even trying to switch from sidewalk to road via a normal kerb and you'd definitely be off balance, but see how fast your reflexes can take over (coz tip of feet cannot touch the ground) and you wont really fall. Difficult to describe to you, but you gotta try it. The vast vast vast majority of your other road cyclist friends wont be able to advise much on this to you, simply coz they are not on flats.
Go TB and get those flats and CF pedals which has a lot of pins, mountain bike flat pedals (110mm wide), you wont slip off the pedals even when off-saddle and putting out 400-500W one lah.
No need to ditch cycling, you did not kena a traffic accident with another vehicle, in which this risk can be largely mitigated with routes and timings. You are not using the bike like a motorcycle doing commuting during more normal hours, be it locally or overseas.
For the distances and stuff that you are I are doing, really no use for cleats. Plus the age too and subsequent consequences should something happen. In fact, i know some masters UK duathletes use running shoes, for 20km duathlons....both the first and second places on podium. Overall faster than cleats actually (that's what they claim, i never bother to verify). They are not slow, iirc 42+ avg speed on bike (draft legal event tho, not like T100) and the 2.4k converted run was in 9 mins range...i just checked, 9:18 for 2.4k (the run legs are 2.5k each). These are very very performance oriented fast folks, and if over 20km they can be faster with cleats over flats, for sure they will use it.
thank you for the effort to write this wall of text. appreciate it.![]()