I started off with around 76% in MS, 12% in FS and 12% in CM. I invested most in MS because it was the only platform where you can see how many invested and their amount. Also i think there are more details on the company and the guarantors etc. so angry investors can look them up should they play punk.
My observations on CM are 1) about 25% is late payment from 1-3 months. 2) The late reasons they give are quite generic. 3) withdrawal need $5, which is quite alot, already 1% if your interest income is $500. 4) no control over the investment amount as it is pro rata basis. amount can range from $1+ to $600++. 5) over saturated. 100% funded within mins. no point reading the prospectus.
But, the net income is the highest in my case and is a good additional income platform if you intend to set aside an amount and just let it auto-run until eternity.
For FS, same as wonghw12, the track record is good, and the late updates seem detailed and personalized, not some copy pasta. But, it is the most satuarated. most of the time can only invest $50 or $100. also, no charge for withdrawal.
Now, i feel the p2p market is over saturated and the trend is going towards auto-investing with minimum amount or pro-rata basis. not worth the effort to read through 100+ companies details just to invest $100 and earn $10 each. even if you do, you will lose out to auto-investors. and if 1 defaults, not only all the efforts wasted, you also lose the opporunity costs which you could have earned elsewhere.