Lols, I read one of the thread concerning ACCA and SQP.
He mention that he is a hiring manager and says everything he could just to make going to ACCA less creditworthy.
And in his explanation, his Grammar usage is terrible and hence it is not a one off case and benefit of doubt should be given.
Do you think such trolls should even be trusted at all?
I don't really take his comments seriously. First, ACCA is well heard of in the international stage. I have spoken to colleagues from countries like India, Denmark, Romania and they all know what is ACCA and some of them are taking that to complement their existing qualification. With ISCA coming out with CA Singapore relatively less than a year, it is senseless to come out with conclusion that ACCA would be worthless next and ISCA SQP would be the top accounting qualification. Singapore is a very small country, be it CPA Singapore or CA Singapore, our accounting designation is not well regarded in the international stage simply because of the limited number of members we have in the association. Majority of the members would be Singaporean and with such limited number, it is difficult to reach world stage unlike others like AICPA, ICAEW, CPA Australia, etc and not excluding ACCA.
Lastly, English linguistic capability doesn't determine whether a person can be trusted or not, credible or not. It only show how well u can communicate that's all, so I wouldn't put that as part of the argument to put him off