KamiyaHaine
Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2008
- Messages
- 125
- Reaction score
- 0
I have to disagree. But when it comes to beauty of a diamond, people are always subjective. There is no right or wrong. So this is just my own opinion that is formed based on my knowledge and preference, which is why it may seem biased to some. My preference is always VALUE FOR MONEY. Maximise your budget to get the best visually stunning diamond.
Firstly, cut is the sole component of the 4 C that determines beauty, for as long as the diamond is eye clean at 6 inches. Hence, clarity is the least important aspect. Between a IF stone and a VS1 stone, there won't be any differences as you need a scope to see the differences. So why waste money on high clarity.Next is colour. Do a google search regarding diamond colour and you will see that the differences between D E and F is also negligible. But for D and G, you can spot the difference if you do a side by side comparison test like what they do in the grading labs. (diamond is not set and placed with pavilion facing up). This allows the inspector to see the body colour of the diamond. However, when faced up, you will be seeing reflections of light in the diamond, the colour difference is neglible when faced up. (It is a misconception that the colour of the diamond will change the colour of the reflected light). Hence, G when faced up look very similar to E and F. If you bring a D into the picture, you can only see the difference after very close and detailed inspection if the diamond is faced up.
So the conclusion is -> focus on a stone with a fantastic cut. GIA triple Ex is just the minimum criteria, do analyze the diamond a bit more by using ideal/aset scope to get a superior diamond. I am certain that one of the lower coloured stones such as I and J stones that I bought are a lot more vibrant and bright with great fire compared to many many GIA triple ex high coloured diamonds from diamond sales by Taka or GSS sales by other jewellery shops.
I agree, D E F is quite negligible & I can't see the difference unless they are side by side. But I looked at G face up & it's very obvious to me at viewing distance (say, 12 inches?). Perhaps I am more color sensitive than most. For me, cut & color are the most important. =) Like you said though, color is very subjective. There are probably people who like the more colored stones. Those H & below owned over at pricescope can be very pretty, especially with rose gold. In the end, it's very much about knowing one's FI's preferences. =) I think it's pretty safe to say that most girls in SG want colorless though. If I were to get colored, I'd completely veer that way & get one that is more strongly colored to make it seem intentional. Like Uppercut says, it's probably psychological for most females, but girls who are into diamonds & know diamonds well can probably see the color. As well as photographers. I can set white balance (ballpark of cos) by sight alone, so I'm probably more sensitive than many others.
Oh, her social circle will play a part too. One definitely has to "compete" in that sense. My personal preference would be a F, VS2 (maybe even SI2 if eye clean), and AGS000. I know, my FI very poor thing. =P One definitely needs to suss out what the FI is comfortable with before buying the diamond.