I couldn't actually, until it was outside of the colourless zone, and only when comparing the D to a G. But then again I'm abit cock sometimes lah. heh.
Anyway, I put my deposit down for the 0.77. Keying in the specifications into the HCA gave me a score of 1.1, which is quite acceptable i think, but I also looked at the scopes and it looked alright to my untrained eye. They're gonna give me pictures of the scope images soon, and hopefully then I can post them up and everyone can critique it.
My main considerations were mostly that with the naked eye I couldn't tell the colour differences, and certainly wouldn't be able to tell the inclusions apart, especially so when set. In fact even with a 10x loupe I couldn't really tell where the inclusions were, and there were actually 3 - a feather, crystal and cloud.
I was given to understand that generally clarity is graded on a 'combined severity' basis, i.e., if there were to be 1 inclusion in a VS2 graded stone vs 2 inclusions in another VS2 graded stone, the former would likely have a more severe inclusion, versus multiple but less severe inclusions in the latter. Can anyone verify this?
One thing I've got a concern with though, was that the feather was on the table, between the 3 o'clock and 4'oclock arrows. Are there any structural issues associated with feathers around the table?
If one is able to give further insights, the report is here :
https://myapps.gia.edu/ReportCheckPortal/getReportData.do?&reportno=1156800658&weight=0.77
Thank you!