Nakedtoes
Great Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2002
- Messages
- 60,220
- Reaction score
- 3,614
Hibernate if youre on ssd and have big ram, it'll kill your ssd faster. Just to note.
So sleep mode better for ssd.?
Hibernate if youre on ssd and have big ram, it'll kill your ssd faster. Just to note.
Now windows 10 force you to use PIN instead of password, cannot disable it?
cfm is ms not ibm...?
No, my Windows update 1903 still can use password leh. U use ur email to log in ah?
yeah ikrMs is a bit, I would say, over represented by the Indians.
Hibernate if youre on ssd and have big ram, it'll kill your ssd faster. Just to note.
Wait, so having an SSD and having a big ram is a bad thing if you want to Hibernate?
Sleep does the same too actually if you're on Desktop. It saves the Windows state on BOTH the SSD and the RAM in case of power loss/laptop battery die, you can still resume from sleep from the SSD instead. So no difference to Hibernate.
...,
Nope, this amount of writing to the SSD is not going to wear out the SSD appreciably faster. It was an issue years ago when SSDs are tiny and expensive.
Sleep writes to RAM only. Hybrid sleep (has to be enabled in power settings) writes to both RAM and SSD.
Ah... Thanks for your great insight!
As a 'weird' person, I am up to date and aware of the changes that has happened to Microsoft where the senior employees were sacked and replaced with the new ones.
The senior ways meant even the oldest OS, Windows XP at least had years and years of support. So no matter, if you are on Windows Vista, 7 or 8, you'll still be supported. This one, 1803 only 1 year old already want to drop update you call acceptable? If they weren't so forceful and downright annoying to force the old Windows users to upgrade, I doubt they'd want Windows 10 to begin with. But do the users have a choice? It's either you upgrade or risk all sorts of intrusions. Whereas, the old guards have no problem patching your super old OS to make sure you are just as safe as a latest OS user.
Over the years, the new employees ones has shown nothing but their inability to push out stable updates. Every single increment, as someone has pointed out, always had some sort of problem and what makes matters worst, they delete your entire System Restore points every time they release a new version of Windows. Meaning, even if you go back to the old Windows version, whatever damage done to the settings cannot be restored with the Restore Points. (I didn't realize some people love to spend time troubleshooting and manually fixing their settings back in the 1-4 or so hours they have left after work instead of doing what they intended to do on the PC to begin with.)
I am more amazed at how when it doesn't concern them, they brush off others problems as nothing but noise. It's a forum. It's meant for discussions. Not brush off the people completely. Come here and help give solution. But instead, what value did you add to this conversation?

This is not a game. This is a platform for work, studies, important tasks, videos and more. And if you accept BUGGY updates as acceptable like how you can accept your buggy games, then you are the problem. Because you allow them to release buggy updates one after another.
At least I've reported the bug that I've found to Windows. So they can fix it instead of just ignoring and not getting the problem fixed that affects other people and not just me.
thats quite fked up on Microsoft.. though i am not sure what does that have anything to do with you
you cannot keep living in the past. times have changed. IT security is being treated much more seriously. MS have to show the world they are doing their utmost best to keep their users secure and they chose this way, which is to push out 1903 and drop patching of 1803. whether you like it or not, thats how MS is doing it now. you have gotta move on.
so every new windows patch has problems? tell me something new. you talk as if every patch MS comes out your pc magically dies. you might as well do a fresh reformat then or stop using windows then. the IT world is flexible enough for you to get by on another operating system. oh by the way, if only you have upgraded your windows... you would now have the ability to pause updates up to 35 days which is something i like to do so i DO NOT have to update immediately in case some mega bug appears.
![]()
i have actually given you a beautiful link on how to install a fresh windows 10 v1903 without the needing to upgrade through every windows version. what more you want? oh, as a bonus i just showed you that windows can pause updates now. besides, you were ranting not really asking for solutions so i am not sure what you looking for
of course it is not a game. i run mission critical systems on a daily basis and i do not like buggy updates more than you do. but i understand that security is so much more important than bug fixing. i kept up with times and work with what i have. and you should to.![]()
you can switch to login using local user instead of email....Ya, email and password. Now force me to use pin.![]()
if you are relying on M$ for your systems security...
of course not but you can't expect non tech savvy users to be using linux
initiallyCannot update to 1903 through Windows update. So use Windows update assistant. Yesterday updated successfully. But now starting giving memory management bugchecks restart.
End up uninstall 1903 ,back to 1803.
Sent from Amazon using GAGT