BBCWatcher
Arch-Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2010
- Messages
- 24,277
- Reaction score
- 5,408
OK.If u have 200k cpf 50k cash 50k srs, after allocating for emergency
OK.How would u allocate? Ur idea is good if people are cash rich then it won't make a difference but many investors have much more in cpf and SRS ( if they have been contributing)
Imagine your cash all in equities. It drawdown 50% black swan event.
50k goes to 25k
You wrote, “after allocating for emergency.” Which is it?You actually need 30k or 40k liquidity now, your selling stocks here and switching it into srs at this point will not work. The drawdown already wreak your short term liquidity.
But OK, if you need more than $25K in your example then you obviously would tap your next lowest cost source of short-term liquid funds next. That probably wouldn’t be your SRS account, actually. Even assuming a 0% income tax rate on the early withdrawal there’s still a 5% penalty. A credit card balance transfer offer, for example, could be much more attractive. Even a little borrowing at a broker margin rate could be a better deal.
You can rebalance whatever your remaining combined portfolio is after this cash raising exercise. If you want to exchange a bond fund for a stock fund within your SRS account you certainly can.
If your argument is that you should mark your unrestricted cash long-term stock fund holding at 50% of current value for determining how much “worst case” liquidity you have, OK, you can do that. I have no objection if you want to measure liquidity that way. Of course it’s only fair to mark down bond funds, too. How about a 20% markdown for them? I don’t think measuring liquidity this way will materially affect how most people structure their holdings across SRS and non-SRS accounts, but “whatever.”
