yea, it boils down to each usage also.
for me, i dont have photoshop, video editing software, thus 80gb is more than enough for me.
If Intel SSDs are your only choices, then do note that the 320 should not require a Sata 3 connection to maximise it's throughput, while the 510 does. This is based on initial previews of 320, and confirmed reviews of 510.I'm kinda new to SSD, can anyone tell me which one I should go for if I have a SATA III mobo? The Intel 320 (G3) or 510? Mainly just for OS and gaming...![]()
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-ssd-320-crucial-m4-realssd-c400,2908.html
intel g3 vs crucial m4.. fresh out from tomshardware.. only 51minutes ago
can i chk with u guys, is the reason the benchmarks focus so much on the 4kb random read because of the fact that our drives are normally formatted at 4096 bytes for allocation unit size?
from the benchies the 320 does quite poorly compared to the competition... does it mean if i make the allocation size bigger then the performance will be much better?
80Gb more than enough for OS and main applications.
Win7 + Adobe Creative Suite + MS Office = ~50Gb.
It is recommended to keep an SDD less than 50% full for wear leveling.

It is recommended to keep an SDD less than 50% full for wear leveling.
It is recommended to keep an SDD less than 50% full for wear leveling.
worth to upgrade from c300 to g3 or stick to c300?
