(Storage) SSD Discussion Thread

matty79

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2003
Messages
1,856
Reaction score
0
i would say the sata bandwidth limit is taken into consideration when the controller chips are designed. Sandforce/Marvell/etc are not going to design a chip that will exceed Sata 3 bandwidth...

Well that's obvious. Why would they do that? This is becoming a market where performance doesn't crawl up incrementally (like processors or gpus), rather skyrockets with each new generation. Pci-e solutions like revodrive overcome the SATA 3 bandwidth limitations, but not everyone has a pci-e x4 slot to spare (not me, for one). For most people, it just makes more sense to use a SATA port for a hard disk replacement rather than PCI-E.

The SATA 3 interface (which is currently less than 3 years old) will actually become the bottleneck to further performance by the next generation (gen 4) of ssds.
 
Last edited:

SKinny86

Master Member
Joined
May 30, 2004
Messages
3,466
Reaction score
304
wah looking at the review the G3 dosent look pleasing to me :(
I rather get a G2 with that kinda performance to price given.
 

watzup_ken

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2003
Messages
25,671
Reaction score
2,122
wah looking at the review the G3 dosent look pleasing to me :(
I rather get a G2 with that kinda performance to price given.

Not sure where did you see the G3 review? I hope you don't mean the Intel 510 review cause that us not G3. G3 is suppose to be official on the 28th, which is Monday. ;)
 

wacko

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
15,542
Reaction score
265
The only thing I'm noticing right now is your nick. It's ok... help is out there. :s13::s13:

come on, I didn't think you would stoop so low. I guess if you can't fight reason, that's all you are left with.
 

watzup_ken

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2003
Messages
25,671
Reaction score
2,122
Really? I tink its really too small even for os usage. programs installation easily takes 2-3GB per installation

If it is just OS and applications that you are installing, I believe 80GB is more than enough. Other than games, I hardly see any applications that require a lot of space. With everything I need installed, it should not take up more than 40 to 50GB of the drive. Rest of the stuffs will be stashed in my mechanical drives. :)
 

darren89

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2007
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
0
If it is just OS and applications that you are installing, I believe 80GB is more than enough. Other than games, I hardly see any applications that require a lot of space. With everything I need installed, it should not take up more than 40 to 50GB of the drive. Rest of the stuffs will be stashed in my mechanical drives. :)

yea, it boils down to each usage also.
for me, i dont have photoshop, video editing software, thus 80gb is more than enough for me.
 

silencer13

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2005
Messages
39,880
Reaction score
4,703
80Gb more than enough for OS and main applications.

Win7 + Adobe Creative Suite + MS Office = ~50Gb.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top